Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
AVATAR
1 other identifier
interventional
157
9 countries
14
Brief Summary
Whether to intervene in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular ejection fraction remains controversial. The investigators therefore try to compare clinical outcomes of elective aortic valve replacement to conventional treatment and watchful waiting strategy in a prospective randomized trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2021
CompletedJanuary 12, 2022
December 1, 2021
5.9 years
April 30, 2015
December 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
all cause death, Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) including: ( Acute Myocardial Infarction - AMI, Stroke - CVI, unplanned hospitalization for Heart failure (HF) needing intravenous treatment
36 months
all cause death, Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) including: ( Acute Myocardial Infarction - AMI, Stroke - CVI, unplanned hospitalization for Heart failure (HF) needing intravenous treatment
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
in-hospital and 30 days operative mortality in operated patients in both groups
30 days
repeat aortic valve surgery in operated patients in both groups
5 years
major bleeding according to consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium
5 years
thromboembolic complications based on clinical symptoms, signs and imaging studies
5 years
repeated major adverse cardiovascular events
5 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
conventional drug treatment
NO INTERVENTIONconservative treatment and watchful waiting till symptom onset (then aortic valve replacement). Other indications for aortic valve replacement include reduced left ventricular systolic function
elective aortic valve replacement
ACTIVE COMPARATORelective aortic valve surgery (replacement) within 4 weeks after randomization
Interventions
open heart aortic valve replacement
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- men and women of any ethnic origin aged ≥18 years
- Written informed consent
- V max across the aortic valve \> 4m/s or Pmean ≥ 40mmHg and AVA ≤ 1cm2 or AVAi ≤ 0.6cm2/m2 at rest
- Without reported symptoms
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score \< 8%
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior randomization
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study or to follow the protocol
- Positive stress-test defined as:
- Anginal chest pain during testing
- Syncope, dizziness during testing
- Decrease in systolic blood pressure during exercise ≥ 20mmHg
- Malignant arrhythmia during exercise testing (VT or VF)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50% at rest
- Very severe AS (defined as Vmax \> 5.5 m/s at rest)
- Significant disease of other valves (Mitral stenosis with Pmean \> 5mg, or any significant regurgitation ≥ 3+
- Recent AMI (\< 1 year)
- Need for additional by-pass surgery or for aortic root replacement (i.e Bentall) or ascending aorta in asymptomatic patients undergoing AVR
- Previous by-pass surgery
- Previous any heart valve surgery
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Cardiovascular Center Aalst
Aalst, 9320, Belgium
University Clinical Center "Rebro"
Zagreb, Croatia
University Clinical Center ''Sestre milosrdnice''
Zagreb, Croatia
University Hospital Brno
Brno, 62500, Czechia
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM)
Prague, 14021, Czechia
Hôpital Cardiologique de Haut Lévèque
Pessac, 33604, France
University Hospital Galway
Galway, Ireland
Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Turin, Piedmont, Italy
Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu klinikos
Vilnius, 08661, Lithuania
Medical University of Silesia
Katowice, 40005, Poland
Cardiovascular Center 'Dedinje"
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
CCSerbia
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
University Clinical Centre Zvezdara
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Insitute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Sremska Kamenica"
Novi Sad, Serbia
Related Publications (5)
Banovic M, Iung B, Bartunek J, Asanin M, Beleslin B, Biocina B, Casselman F, da Costa M, Deja M, Gasparovic H, Kala P, Labrousse L, Loncar Z, Marinkovic J, Nedeljkovic I, Nedeljkovic M, Nemec P, Nikolic SD, Pencina M, Penicka M, Ristic A, Sharif F, Van Camp G, Vanderheyden M, Wojakowski W, Putnik S. Rationale and design of the Aortic Valve replAcemenT versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR trial): A randomized multicenter controlled event-driven trial. Am Heart J. 2016 Apr;174:147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
PMID: 26995381BACKGROUNDBanovic M, Iung B, Bartunek J, Penicka M, Vanderheyden M, Casselman F, van Camp G, Nikolic S, Putnik S. The Aortic Valve replAcemenT versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR trial): A protocol update. Am Heart J. 2018 Jan;195:153-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 29224644BACKGROUNDBanovic M, Putnik S, Penicka M, Doros G, Deja MA, Kockova R, Kotrc M, Glaveckaite S, Gasparovic H, Pavlovic N, Velicki L, Salizzoni S, Wojakowski W, Van Camp G, Nikolic SD, Iung B, Bartunek J; AVATAR Trial Investigators*. Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial. Circulation. 2022 Mar;145(9):648-658. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057639. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
PMID: 34779220RESULTBanovic M, Putnik S, Da Costa BR, Penicka M, Deja MA, Kotrc M, Kockova R, Glaveckaite S, Gasparovic H, Pavlovic N, Velicki L, Salizzoni S, Wojakowski W, Van Camp G, Gradinac S, Laufer M, Tomovic S, Busic I, Bojanic M, Ristic A, Klasnja A, Matkovic M, Boskovic N, Zivic K, Jovanovic M, Nikolic SD, Iung B, Bartunek J. Aortic valve replacement vs. conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial. Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 8;45(42):4526-4535. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae585.
PMID: 39217448DERIVEDZelis JM, Tonino PAL, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL, Johnson NP. Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions. J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 22;2020:4603169. doi: 10.1155/2020/4603169. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32774184DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marko Banovic, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC
Cardiology Department, University Clinical Centre of Serbia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Svetozar Putnik, MD, PhD
Cardiac Surgery Department, University Clinical Centre of Serbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD, FESC, FACC, Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2015
First Posted
May 7, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2021
Study Completion
May 1, 2021
Last Updated
January 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12