NCT03379038

Brief Summary

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Physical Therapy management in relieving constipation among Spastic Cerebral Palsy children. There were two groups, Group A received routine Physical Therapy and Group B received maintenance Physical Therapy (aim to maintain current level of spasticity, functionality to avoid deterioration of conadition as approved by ASRC)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 20, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 27, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Cerebral PalsySpasticityConstipationGross Motor Functional Classification ScaleDefecation FrequencyConstipation Severity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Spastcity Spasticity

    Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) * 0 = No increase in muscle tone * 1 = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension * 1+ = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM * 2 = More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved * 3 = Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult. * 4 = Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension

    6 Weeks

  • Defecation Frequency (DF)

    Defecation frequency less than three times a week was considered constipation and measured by nominal scale 1= twice a month, 2= once a week, 3= twice a week and 4= daily

    6 weeks

  • Constipation assessment scale (CAS)

    used to determine the severity of constipation. The CAS consists of eight characteristics. Each of these characteristics is given a three point rating scale (0= no problem, 1= some problem, 2= severe problem). These scores are summed up to make a range from 0 for no constipation to 16 for the most severe constipation

    6 Weeks

Study Arms (2)

Progressive Physical Therapy (PPT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Duration: Each child was given 40-minute session. Frequency: Two sets were performed, 5-10 active assisted sit-ups in each set at least once a day. Furthermore, the subjects were advised to use CP chair and standing frame/wall corner for sitting/standing position respectively for at least 15-30 minutes once a day. These exercises were followed by reflex inhibiting postures in sitting and lying positions. Total 42 sessions were performed in 6 weeks (7 days/week). Intensity: The aim of the PPT was to improve the patient's level of spasticity, strength and activity level.

Other: Progressive Physical Therapy

Maintenance Physical Therapy (MPT)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Duration: Each child was given 40-minute session. Frequency: Two sets were performed, 5-10 active assisted sit-ups in each set at least once a day. Furthermore, the subjects were advised to use CP chair and standing frame/wall corner for sitting/standing position respectively for at least 15-30 minutes once a day. These exercises were followed by reflex inhibiting postures in sitting and lying positions. Total 42 sessions were performed in 6 weeks (7 days/week). Intensity:The aim of the MPT was to maintain the patient's current level of spasticity, strength and activity level.

Other: Maintenance Physical Therapy

Interventions

Stretching of the tight muscle, positioning, abdominal co activation; rolling etc to decrease muscle tone and functional independence.

Progressive Physical Therapy (PPT)

Same Physical therapy protocol but aim was to maintain current level of spasticity and functioning

Maintenance Physical Therapy (MPT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 11 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may not qualify if:

  • CP children with other systemic co-morbidities, physical deformity in GIT and intellectual disability were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Isra Institute or Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad

Islamabad, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral PalsyMuscle SpasticityConstipation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, Digestive

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: The two groups were progressive physical therapy group and maintenance physical therapy group. For any given subject, spasticity, defecation frequency and constipation severity evaluations were completed on the same day. Each subject in PPT group completed 6 weeks of physical therapy sessions which were aimed to decrease spasticity, increase ROM, and improve strength and functional activity level. Each subject was evaluated for changes in symptoms on, 2nd week, 4th week and 6th week. In MPT group same protocol was used but the aim was to maintain current status of level of spasticity, ROM, strength and functional activity. After 6 weeks of physical therapy sessions were completed both groups underwent a 2-week washout period to eliminate the effects of 6-week physical therapy. After the washout period subjects were crossed over from PPT group to MPT group and vice versa.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2017

First Posted

December 20, 2017

Study Start

December 27, 2017

Primary Completion

January 20, 2019

Study Completion

January 30, 2019

Last Updated

February 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR

Locations