Effect of an Observer Tool on Learning Outcomes During High Fidelity Simulation
Impact of the Use of an Observer Tool Based on Technical Skills on Learning Outcomes in Anesthesia Residents Undergoing High Fidelity Simulation
1 other identifier
interventional
89
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The increasing use of high-fidelity simulation is limited by the imbalance between the growing number of students and the human resources available in such a way that all residents cannot play a role during scenarios. The learning outcomes of observers need to be studied in more depth. Previous studies have provided controversial results but overall no significant differences in learning outcomes can be demonstrated between observers and participants engaged as players in scenarios. Moreover, preliminary data suggest that learning outcomes of observers might be improved by using an observer tool during the scenario. However, no high-quality study has yet shown if this assumption is verified. In the present study, 3rd-4th year residents in anesthesia will be randomized before high fidelity scenarios to act as observers only or active participants in some scenarios and observers in others. The main outcome parameter will be the learning outcomes by comparing data obtained before and after the sessions by using questionnaires specifically dedicated to the knowledge of technical skills in the management of crisis scenarios.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2017
CompletedNovember 29, 2017
November 1, 2017
6 days
June 22, 2017
November 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Learning outcomes assessing knowledge of technical skills
The main outcome parameter will be the learning outcomes by comparing data obtained before and after the sessions by using questionnaires specifically dedicated to the knowledge of technical skills in the management of crisis scenarios: change will be assessed
measured before and immediately after the session
Secondary Outcomes (1)
self assessment of the effect of the simulation session on non-technical skills
measured immediately after the session
Study Arms (2)
educational intervention - observer tool
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will be given the observer tool (OT) before the scenario and will be explained how to use it, i.e. observe all details of the scenario on the screen and tick on the OT all actions which are done by active participants.The observer tool will also be used to engage observers during the debriefing session. The scenario will then be observed in a screen (i.e. the scenario is played by active participants in an adjacent room using direct video-recording and transmission.
without observer tool
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will not be given the observer tool (OT) before the scenario but will be asked to observe all details of the scenario on the screen.The observers will also be asked to participate during the debriefing session.
Interventions
To assess if the use of an observer tool by observers during high fidelity simulation improves learning outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- residents in anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Université Paris Sud
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
Related Publications (2)
Lai A, Haligua A, Dylan Bould M, Everett T, Gale M, Pigford AA, Boet S. Learning crisis resource management: Practicing versus an observational role in simulation training - a randomized controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016 Aug;35(4):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.10.010. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
PMID: 26987738BACKGROUNDSuet G, Blanie A, De Montblanc J, Benhamou D. Use of an Observer Tool to Enhance Observers' Learning of Anesthesia Residents During High-Fidelity Simulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Simul Healthc. 2022 Feb 1;17(1):e75-e82. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000584.
PMID: 34120134DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
BENHAMOU Dan, MD
Université Paris-Sud
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Chair of the simulation center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2017
First Posted
November 29, 2017
Study Start
June 23, 2017
Primary Completion
June 29, 2017
Study Completion
June 30, 2017
Last Updated
November 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share