The First Aid Skill Simulation Training of Nurses of General Wards.

NCT02995785 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: 201611028RINB
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 92
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

\[Background and Objective\]First-aid skill training plays an important role in the education of nurses. How to implement stable and efficient skill is very important. (Kardong-Edgren, Oermann, Odom-Maryon, \& Ha, 2010). Simulation-based workshops,or training, as the most common enhancing skills.(Topping et al., 2015) .This study was designed to assist nurses enhancing the clinical ability and safety the patients in the first aid-related skills and knowledge. The purpose of this study is to compare the two groups of(1) first aid knowledge online test. (2) first aid skills test.【Methods】This study is a general ward nurses first aid technical examination, pre-test and post-test, the random control trial. Review by the hospital ethics committee and execution date on105/12/12-107/03/08, a total of 92 cases, obtained consent of all cases, then the case will be test in our hospital clinical skills center. Subject condition: general ward nurse (minimum age\> 20 years),exclusion conditions: intensive care unit nurses, emergency department nurses. Study Procedure: Subjects who obtained the informed consent were randomly assigned to the first aid skill simulation training group (FAST) or the traditional group (T) by using a computer generated number. Randomization envelopes were opened and randomization performed by the study nurse after informed consent was obtained. Each group consisted of 46 subjects. All the subjects were pre-test first aid knowledge online test, followed were pre-test first aid skills test at the Clinical Skills Center.After pre-test,the experimental group are give the first aid skill simulation training with debriefing(75-min) and online lecture(15-min).While the traditional group only give online lecture(15-min). Two weeks later, the post-test include online test and skills test for two groups. After all the data were collected by the researchers who unknown the groups, the names of the cases were removed and the scores of the two groups were compared before and after.The test Based on 2015 AHA Guidelines for CPR \& ECC (2015 Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality \& 2015American Heart Association and 2015).The data will be archived in SPSS20.0 statistical package software. Statistical methods such as T-test and Anova variance analysis are used to analyze the data【Expected Result】: The knowledge and skills in the experimental group were better than the traditional group, and the first-aid simulation skill training was helpful for the clinical emergency situations.

Conditions

Simulation

Keywords

Simulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Change from Baseline in First aid skills test at 2 Weeks.

  The test Based on 2015 AHA Guidelines for CPR \& ECC (2015 Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality \& 2015American Heart Association and 2015).The contents of the test,first station:equipment test 13%, second station:assisted with intubation and fixation 16%, third station: LMA 12%, fourth station: Ambu bagging 10%, fifth station: Drugs 12%, sixth station: Defribrator 12%, seventh station: Role positioning 17%, and eighth station: Leader Training 8%, total score is 100 points, the higher the better.

  baseline and 2 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Change from Baseline in First aid knowledge online test at 2 Weeks.

  baseline and 2 weeks.

Study Arms (2)

Experimental:simulation-based training

OTHER

Experimental

Other: simulation-based training; Other: traditional training

Active comparatorr: traditional training

OTHER

Traditional

Other: traditional training

Interventions

simulation-based training OTHER

simulation-based training:The first aid skill simulation training with discussion and debriefing(75-min) and TMS online lecture(15-min).

Experimental:simulation-based training

traditional training OTHER

traditional training:Give TMS online lecture(15-min).

Active comparatorr: traditional training; Experimental:simulation-based training

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• general ward nurse

You may not qualify if:

• intensive care unit nurses, emergency department nurses.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• National Taiwan University Hospital: lead

Study Officials

• Jin-Shing chen

  National Taiwan University Hospital

  STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Pei-Yin Hsieh, MSN

CONTACT

+886-2-23123456; peiyin3111@ntuh.gov.tw

Jin-Shing chen

CONTACT

chenjs@ntu.edu.tw

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: INVESTIGATOR
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 12, 2016
• First Posted: December 16, 2016
• Study Start: December 1, 2016
• Primary Completion: March 1, 2018
• Study Completion: March 1, 2018
• Last Updated: December 16, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share