Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) Outcomes in Patients With Unilateral Cochlear Implants
1 other identifier
interventional
21
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Bilateral severe to profound hearing loss is a socially disabling handicap. Cochlear implants can be used to improve hearing in cases where conventional hearing aids are not effective. There are few studies about the long latency Auditory Evoked Potential (P300), in individuals with hearing loss and Cochlear Implant (CI) users. The aim of this project is to study the behavior of P300 in users of unilateral CI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 4, 2020
CompletedMarch 31, 2020
March 1, 2020
3.5 years
November 20, 2017
March 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement of the P300 Responses after CI
Improving the cognitive process on CI receivers
06 months after CI
Study Arms (1)
patients with unilateral cochlear implants submitted to P300
EXPERIMENTALPatients with unilateral cochlear implants, using the speech processor at least 6 months, submitted to P300 exam before CI surgery, on speech processor activation and after 06 months.
Interventions
Perform the P300 exams.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with post-lingual hearing loss undergoing cochlear implant surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Prelingual hearing loss
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (13)
McPherson, D.L. Late potentials of the auditory system. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1996.
BACKGROUNDGroenen PA, Makhdoum M, van den Brink JL, Stollman MH, Snik AF, van den Broek P. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol. 1996 Nov;116(6):785-90. doi: 10.3109/00016489609137926.
PMID: 8973707BACKGROUNDKileny PR. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:37-42; discussion 43-7.
PMID: 2069187RESULTDuarte Josilene Luciene, Alvarenga Kátia de Freitas, Costa Orozimbo Alves. Potencial cognitivo P300 realizado em campo livre: aplicabilidade do teste. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol. [Internet]. 2004 Dec [cited 2015 May 02] ; 70( 6 ): 780-785.
RESULTMicco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Sharma A, Nicol T, Wiet RJ. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol. 1995 Jul;16(4):514-20.
PMID: 8588653RESULTJordan K, Schmidt A, Plotz K, von Specht H, Begall K, Roth N, Scheich H. Auditory event-related potentials in post- and prelingually deaf cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S116-7.
PMID: 9391625RESULTMuhler R, Ziese M, Kevanishvili Z, Schmidt M, von Specht H. Visualization of stimulation patterns in cochlear implants: application to event-related potentials (P300) in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):186-90. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120366.80555.2a.
PMID: 15064663RESULTKlem GH, Luders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 10590970RESULTKelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;116(6):1235-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.02.011. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
PMID: 15978485RESULTDiniz Junior J, Mangabeira-Albernaz PL, Munhoz MS, Fukuda Y. Cognitive potentials in children with learning disabilities. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997 Mar;117(2):211-3. doi: 10.3109/00016489709117772.
PMID: 9105451RESULTCalhau CM, Lima Junior LR, Reis AM, Capistrano AK, Lima Ddo V, Calhau AC, Rodrigues Junior Fde A. [Etiology profile of the patients implanted in the cochlear implant program]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jan-Feb;77(1):13-8. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000100003.
PMID: 21340183RESULTBeynon AJ, Snik AF, Stegeman DF, van den Broek P. Discrimination of speech sound contrasts determined with behavioral tests and event-related potentials in cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Jan;16(1):42-53. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.1.5.
PMID: 15715067RESULTOkusa M, Shiraishi T, Kubo T, Nageishi Y. Effects of discrimination difficulty on cognitive event-related brain potentials in patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;121(5):610-5. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70067-7.
PMID: 10547481RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Miguel Hyppolito, MD/PhD
Coordinator Health Auditory Care Program of the HCRP-FMRP-USP
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Not Apply
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Otolaryngology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2017
First Posted
November 24, 2017
Study Start
November 20, 2016
Primary Completion
June 4, 2020
Study Completion
June 4, 2020
Last Updated
March 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- 2 years
- Access Criteria
- Free to all IPD.
Include researchers on the support team.