NCT03338842

Brief Summary

Patients with limb amputations experience the sensation of the missing extremity, which is sometimes coupled with a persistent and debilitating pain in the missing limb, a condition known as phantom limb pain (PLP). This study will test the use of virtual reality (VR) training as a possible treatment of PLP.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 2017

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 12, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 16, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

November 1, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Changes in the Brief Pain Inventory

    The Brief Pain Inventory is a questionnaire which provide a description of the type and location of pain (question 1-2),the pain severity (question 3-6 pain rating scales with 0-10 range - with 10 indicating severe pain), of the current treatment for pain (question 7-8) and the pain interference in daily life (question 9- range from 0 to 10 with a maximum score of 10 indicating severe interference). A decrease (i.e. reduction in the scores) in pain severity and in the pain interference in daily activity is expected as consequence of the virtual reality training.

    Pre and post Phase 1; Pre and post Phase 2; at 1, 4 and 8 weeks

  • Changes in the McGill Pain Questionnaire

    The McGill Pain Questionnaire is a questionnaire which provide a description of the type of pain using series of adjectives on of the pain severity, using a visual analogue scale (range of 0-100 range - with 100 indicating severe pain). A decrease in pain severity (decrease in the score in the visual analogue scale) is expected as consequence of the virtual reality training.

    Pre and post Phase 1; Pre and post Phase 2; at 1, 4 and 8 weeks

  • Changes in the Frenchay Activities Index

    The the Frenchay Activities Index is a 15 items questionnaire, which investigate how often people perform certain daily activity (e.g. preparing meals), using a scale from 0 to 3, with a score of 3 indicating that the activity is performed frequently. An increase in the Frenchay Activities Index is expected as consequence of the virtual reality training.

    Pre and post Phase 1; Pre and post Phase 2; at 1, 4 and 8 weeks

  • Changes in the12-Item Short Form Health Survey

    The12-Item Short Form Health Survey is a questionnaire which investigate the quality of emotional and physical heath of individuals. An improvement in the quality of the individuals' health is expected as consequence of the training.

    Pre and post Phase 1; Pre and post Phase 2; at 1, 4 and 8 weeks

  • Changes in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale measures depression is a 14 questions scale, which measure the level of depression and anxiety (maximum score of 21 indicating abnormal performance). A decrease in the score in this scale is expected as consequence of the virtual reality training

    Pre and post Phase 1; Pre and post Phase 2; at 1, 4 and 8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in the Limb deficiency and Phantom Limb questionnaire.

    Pre and post Phase 1; Pre and post Phase 2; at 1, 4 and 8 weeks

  • Changes in the 13-item Pain Catastrophizing scale

    Pre and post Phase 1; Pre and post Phase 2; at 1, 4 and 8 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Distractor and Lower limb VR

EXPERIMENTAL

The training sessions consist of Phase 1 (Distractor VR) in which patients will explore VR environments and Phase 2 (Lower limb VR) in which they will play games using their VR lower-limbs.

Device: Distractor and Lower limb VR

Interventions

In the first phase (A), subjects will receive the Distraction VR treatment during 5, 6, or 7 one-hour-long sessions occurring twice weekly. After the A phase, the remaining sessions (B phase) will consist of Lower-Limb VR treatment. This number includes a mean of 6 (range 5-7) phase A sessions and mean of 11 (range 10-12) phase B sessions.

Distractor and Lower limb VR

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects will have undergone amputation of one leg (either above or below the knee) at least 4 months before the enrollment in the study;
  • Will have chronic pain in the phantom limb:

You may not qualify if:

  • History of stroke or traumatic brain injury;
  • Major active psychiatric illness that may interfere with required study procedures or treatments as determined by the PI on the study, who is a behavioral neurologist;
  • Subjects with major medical illness that would be expected to interfere with their ability to complete the study will be excluded.
  • Subjects with implanted electronic devices.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Weeks SR, Anderson-Barnes VC, Tsao JW. Phantom limb pain: theories and therapies. Neurologist. 2010 Sep;16(5):277-86. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181edf128.

    PMID: 20827116BACKGROUND
  • Dietrich C, Walter-Walsh K, Preissler S, Hofmann GO, Witte OW, Miltner WH, Weiss T. Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: proof of a principle. Neurosci Lett. 2012 Jan 24;507(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.068. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

    PMID: 22085692BACKGROUND
  • Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, Heilman KM, Tsao JW. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 22;357(21):2206-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc071927. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18032777BACKGROUND
  • Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.

    PMID: 8080219BACKGROUND
  • Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987 Aug;30(2):191-197. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.

    PMID: 3670870BACKGROUND
  • Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983 May;12(2):166-70. doi: 10.1093/ageing/12.2.166.

    PMID: 6869117BACKGROUND
  • Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

    PMID: 8628042BACKGROUND
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
  • Goller AI, Richards K, Novak S, Ward J. Mirror-touch synaesthesia in the phantom limbs of amputees. Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

    PMID: 22981809BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and InjuriesPhantom Limb

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPain, PostoperativePostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsPain

Study Officials

  • Branch Coslett

    hbc@mail.med.upenn.edu

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Laurel Buxbaum

    Lbuxbaum@einstein.edu

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: In the first phase (A), subjects will receive the Distraction VR treatment during 5, 6, or 7 one-hour-long sessions occurring twice weekly. After the A phase, the remaining sessions (B phase) will consist of Lower-Limb VR treatment. This number includes a mean of 6 (range 5-7) phase A sessions and mean of 11 (range 10-12) phase B sessions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2017

First Posted

November 9, 2017

Study Start

January 12, 2018

Primary Completion

November 1, 2019

Study Completion

November 1, 2019

Last Updated

June 16, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations