Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in GIOPVCF
1 other identifier
observational
106
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Based on the case reports and other literature, the investigators hypothesize that using PVP for treating GIOPVCF is associated with increased risk of vertebral refractures and does not provide further benefits compared to conservative treatments. The overall objective of this prospective cohort study is to compare the efficacy of PVP and conservative treatment for GIOPVCF. The evaluation of efficacy of therapy includes: 1) the incidence of vertebral refractures; 2) therapeutic effects (pain relief and health-related life quality) and 3) complications. The results from study will be written in English and disseminated widely through scholarly presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and other written communications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2017
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2019
CompletedNovember 6, 2017
October 1, 2017
2.1 years
October 8, 2017
November 1, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of vertebral re-fracture
Anterior-posterior and lateral spinal radiograph will be obtained. If a new vertebral fracture was doubted, MRI was undertaken to confirm it. When there is disagreement between both observers a consensus meeting is held. Incidence of vertebral re-fracture is Number of new fracture vertebrae/Number of total vertebrae
12 months after the treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain change from baseline to 12 months
12 months after the treatment
Study Arms (2)
Percutaneous vertebroplasty
All PVPs are performed by experienced spine surgeons under optimal fluoroscopic guidance. The procedure takes place under sterile conditions. Local anesthesia is administered to the periosteum of the targeted pedicle via skin. Polymethylmethacrylate bone cement is injected under continuous fluoroscopic guidance using 1.0 ml syringes and 13 Gauge bone biopsy needles by bilateral procedures. Patients are encouraged to stand up and walk with brace immediately after operation and the brace are required to be worn for 3 months. Furthermore, all patients will take oral bisphosphonates treatment together with supplemental calcium and vitamin D.
Conservative treatment
In conservative treatment group, the patients were required horizontal bed rest for the initial 2 weeks after diagnosis. Then, they were encouraged to stand up and walk with brace and assistance. The bed rest time was extended if the back pain worsened when they stood up and walked. The brace should be worn in 3 months. For pain medication, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed for every patient. Additional analgesics, such as tramadol and morphine, would be added in case NSAIDs were not effective. Two weeks after diagnosis, physical therapy was started. All patients are put on osteoporosis medication, bisphosphonates together with supplemental calcium and vitamin D.
Interventions
The procedure takes place under sterile conditions. Local anesthesia is administered from skin to the periosteum of the targeted pedicle. Polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (Mendec Spine; Tecres SPA, Sommacampagna, Italy) is injected under continuous fluoroscopic imaging guidance using 1.0 ml syringes and 13 Gauge bone biopsy needles by bilateral procedures. The amount of injected cement in each treated vertebral body and any cement leakage is recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients had fresh vertebral compression fractures with GIOP
You may qualify if:
- Patients have fresh vertebral compression fractures regarding spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss; level of fracture at Th5 or lower; bone edema on MRI, focal tenderness on VCF level).
- Patients have back pain for 6 weeks or less, with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score equal or less than 5.
- GCs consumption for more than 3 months (prednisone equivalent or more than 5 mg daily).
- Reduced bone density with T-scores equal or less than -1.
- Age at 55 or higher.
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent other secondary osteoporosis.
- Previous PVP procedure or other spinal surgery on thoracic or lumbar segments.
- Systemic or local infection in spine (osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis)
- Unable to comply with study due to severe psychosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Chunde Li, Doctor
Peking University First Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2017
First Posted
November 6, 2017
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2019
Study Completion
December 30, 2019
Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10