Use of Neurofeedback to Enhance Attention After Brain Injury
The Effect of Neurofeedback Training on Sustained Attention and Mind Wandering Events in Patients With Brain Injury: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Difficulty to sustain attention over a prolonged period of time is one of the core difficulties experienced by people who have undergone traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation of attention is often based on compensatory strategies, because of the limited impact of cognitive training on improving attentional capacity after brain injury. New therapeutic approaches to explore the plastic recovery of the brain after injury, and consequent performance improvement, are warranted. Neurofeedback (NFB) allows the self-regulation of brain activity using visual feedback. Very recently, it has been demonstrated that NFB training targeted at reducing alpha power (alpha desynchronization NFB), can induce initial plastic changes in brain networks associated with attention. It has been proposed that NFB can improve cognitive performance by tuning oscillatory activity of the brain towards a more healthy balance between neural network flexibility and stability. It is speculated that the use of alpha desynchronization NFB training, with people who present with brain injury, can enhance sustained attention in as much as the training promotes neural variability during resting state (i.e. more flexible network configuration) and neural stability during a sustained attention task (i.e. more stable network configuration). However, before assessing the effectiveness of the intervention, it is necessary to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability thereof. This study will recruit 14 participants and randomly assign them to two groups: a NFB group and a video games control group. Long-term changes will be evaluated at two time points for both groups: baseline and post-intervention. The NFB group will have a follow-up session one week after the intervention, to evaluate whether there are long lasting changes after NFB training. In addition, short-term changes of NFB will be evaluated for the experimental group, contrasting EEG activity immediately before and after the last NFB session.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 17, 2018
CompletedFebruary 27, 2019
February 1, 2019
6 months
October 24, 2017
February 26, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Attentional performance - MAAS
Change in score on Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) 1. Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), (Brown et al. 2003). It is a 15-item questionnaire that assesses day-to-day experiences of mind wandering. 2. Each of the 15 questions is rated with a number between 1 to 6, with 1 being "almost always" and 6 being "almost never". The total score is calculated by averaging the answers across the 15 items. The minimum score is 1 and the maximum score is 6. The questionnaire does not have subscales. 3. Higher scores reflect higher levels of mindfulness, this is considered to be a better outcome. Instead, lower scores reflect higher levels of mind wandering, this is considered to be a worst outcome. 4. No subscales are combined.
Baseline and week 4
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Attentional performance - CTET
Baseline, week 4 and week 5
Attentional performance - TEA
Baseline and week 4
Study Arms (2)
Neurofeedback training
EXPERIMENTALSixteen 30-minute sessions of neurofeedback training performed once a day over the course of four weeks (four sessions each week)
Video game control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSixteen 30-minute sessions of playing video games once a day over the course of four weeks (four sessions each week)
Interventions
Sixteen 30-minute sessions of neurofeedback training over four weeks: 7 x 3-minute blocks of training flanked by a 3-minute resting state block with eyes-open.
Sixteen 30-minute sessions of video game playing over four weeks: 7 x 3-minute blocks flanked by a 3-minute seated relaxation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- normal or corrected to normal vision
- able to provide consent
- non-progressive brain injury
- impairment of sustained attention
- stable medication regime (expected not to change during the period of the study)
- minimum computer literacy (owning a computer, laptop, tablet, ipad etc)
- native English-speakers
You may not qualify if:
- epilepsy
- co-morbid progressive neurological or neurodegenerative condition
- aggressive behaviour
- unhealed scalp wounds
- unable to give informed consent
- unable to cooperate with the study protocol (e.g. severe aphasia, uncorrected impairment of hearing or vision, illiteracy or unable to understand English)
- clinically unstable (e.g. due to major intercurrent illness)
- undertaking changes in the existing treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Glasgowlead
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust
Glasgow, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jon Evans, PhD
Professor of Applied Neuropsychology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Applied Neuropsychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2017
First Posted
October 27, 2017
Study Start
February 2, 2018
Primary Completion
July 17, 2018
Study Completion
July 17, 2018
Last Updated
February 27, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02