Early Mobilisation After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Early Mobilisation by Head-up Tilt With Stepping Compared With Standard Care After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury - a Randomised Clinical Feasibility Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Increasing focus on the negative effects of bed rest have become more apparent in the intensive care unit within the last decade. A few studies have found an association between early rehabilitation starting at the intensive care unit and outcome after discharge from rehabilitation. The early mobilization presents with challenges regarding haemodynamic stability. The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility before conducting a larger randomised trial that will investigate benefits and harms of an intensive physical rehabilitation intervention focusing on mobilisation to the upright position, starting as early as clinically feasible in the intensive care unit
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedMay 24, 2019
May 1, 2019
2 years
October 3, 2016
May 23, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility outcome
Successful inclusion of 60% or more of the patients. The intervention will be considered feasible if at least 80% of the intended treatment sessions are applied to at least 70% of the patients. Adverse events and reactions (serious and not serious) and suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions
Within the first four weeks of the study (during the intervention period)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R)
Measured at inclusion, after four weeks, three months and at one year follow-up
Early Functional Ability (EFA)
Measured at inclusion, after four weeks, three months and at one year follow-up
Functional Independence Measures (FIM)
Measured at inclusion, after four weeks, three months and at one year follow-up
Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow
At baseline, after two weeks and at four weeks
Time with post-traumatic amnesia (PTA)
Duration of posttraumatic amnesia
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Early Intensive mobilisation
EXPERIMENTALAs early as possible the experimental group will receive mobilisation on a tilt table for up to 20 minutes 5 days a week for four weeks using an ERIGO tilt table. If orthostatic hypotension occur the patient is moved to supine until parameters are stable again. Hereafter the mobilisation will continue until the patient has completed 20 minutes of standing exercise.
Standard care group
NO INTERVENTIONThe standard care group will receive daily mobilisation to the seated position.
Interventions
The intervention will be performed using a tilt table with integrated stepping movements of the lower extremity (ERIGO, HOCOMA, Switzerland). The goal of the intervention session is that the patient stands upright for 20 minutes. If orthostatic intolerance or increase in intracranial pressure occurs the session will be paused. When the patient is stable mobilization is continued.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Disorders of consciousness (with a tentative diagnosis of the vegetative or minimally conscious state), with a Glasgow Coma Score \< 10 during wake-up call.
- Stable intracranial pressure (ICP \< 20 mmHg for 24 hours).
- Must be able to mobilise beyond 30 degrees elevation
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable fractures contraindicating mobilisation.
- Known heart disease or liver cirrhosis prior to brain injury.
- Spinal cord injury.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rigshospitalet,
Copenhagen, Denmark
Related Publications (23)
Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12 Suppl 2):S101-S114. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016.
PMID: 16373145BACKGROUNDDeJong G, Hsieh CH, Putman K, Smout RJ, Horn SD, Tian W. Physical therapy activities in stroke, knee arthroplasty, and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: their variation, similarities, and association with functional outcomes. Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;91(12):1826-37. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100424. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
PMID: 22003165BACKGROUNDRiberholt CG, Thorlund JB, Mehlsen J, Nordenbo AM. Patients with severe acquired brain injury show increased arousal in tilt-table training. Dan Med J. 2013 Dec;60(12):A4739.
PMID: 24355448BACKGROUNDWilson BA DS, Tunnard C, Watson P and Florschutz G. The Effect of Positioning on the Level of Arousal and Awareness in Patients in the Vegetative State or the Minimally Conscious State: A Replication and Extension of a Previous Finding. BRAIN IMPAIRMENT. 2013;14(3):475-9.
BACKGROUNDElliott L, Coleman M, Shiel A, Wilson BA, Badwan D, Menon D, Pickard J. Effect of posture on levels of arousal and awareness in vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: a preliminary investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;76(2):298-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.047357. No abstract available.
PMID: 15654064BACKGROUNDNewman M, Barker K. The effect of supported standing in adults with upper motor neurone disorders: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Dec;26(12):1059-77. doi: 10.1177/0269215512443373. Epub 2012 May 29.
PMID: 22643724BACKGROUNDAndelic N, Bautz-Holter E, Ronning P, Olafsen K, Sigurdardottir S, Schanke AK, Sveen U, Tornas S, Sandhaug M, Roe C. Does an early onset and continuous chain of rehabilitation improve the long-term functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):66-74. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1811. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
PMID: 21864138BACKGROUNDFrazzitta G, Valsecchi R, Zivi I, Sebastianelli L, Bonini S, Zarucchi A, Matteri D, Molatore K, Maestri R, Saltuari L. Safety and Feasibility of a Very Early Verticalization in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):290-2. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000135. No abstract available.
PMID: 26147317BACKGROUNDRiberholt CG, Olesen ND, Thing M, Juhl CB, Mehlsen J, Petersen TH. Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation during Head Up Tilt in Patients with Severe Brain Injury. PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154831. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27168188BACKGROUNDVerheyden B, Ector H, Aubert AE, Reybrouck T. Tilt training increases the vasoconstrictor reserve in patients with neurally mediated syncope evoked by head-up tilt testing. Eur Heart J. 2008 Jun;29(12):1523-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn134. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
PMID: 18375398BACKGROUNDLang EW, Lagopoulos J, Griffith J, Yip K, Mudaliar Y, Mehdorn HM, Dorsch NW. Noninvasive cerebrovascular autoregulation assessment in traumatic brain injury: validation and utility. J Neurotrauma. 2003 Jan;20(1):69-75. doi: 10.1089/08977150360517191.
PMID: 12614589BACKGROUNDLiu X, Czosnyka M, Donnelly J, Budohoski KP, Varsos GV, Nasr N, Brady KM, Reinhard M, Hutchinson PJ, Smielewski P. Comparison of frequency and time domain methods of assessment of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015 Feb;35(2):248-56. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.192. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
PMID: 25407266BACKGROUNDGiacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
PMID: 15605342BACKGROUNDHankemeier A, Rollnik JD. The Early Functional Abilities (EFA) scale to assess neurological and neurosurgical early rehabilitation patients. BMC Neurol. 2015 Oct 19;15:207. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0469-z.
PMID: 26482349BACKGROUNDvan Baalen B, Odding E, van Woensel MP, Roebroeck ME. Reliability and sensitivity to change of measurement instruments used in a traumatic brain injury population. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Aug;20(8):686-700. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cre982oa.
PMID: 16944826BACKGROUNDStubbs PW, Pallesen H, Pedersen AR, Nielsen JF. Using EFA and FIM rating scales could provide a more complete assessment of patients with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(26):2278-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.904935. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
PMID: 24678931BACKGROUNDGronwall D, Wrightson P. Duration of post-traumatic amnesia after mild head injury. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1980;2(1):51-60.
BACKGROUNDImholz BP, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH. Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res. 1998 Jun;38(3):605-16. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(98)00067-4.
PMID: 9747429BACKGROUNDGiller CA, Bowman G, Dyer H, Mootz L, Krippner W. Cerebral arterial diameters during changes in blood pressure and carbon dioxide during craniotomy. Neurosurgery. 1993 May;32(5):737-41; discussion 741-2.
PMID: 8492848BACKGROUNDBeninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, Stark PC, Black-Schaffer RM, Stein J. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130.
PMID: 16401435BACKGROUNDRiberholt CG, Olsen MH, Berg RMG, Mehlsen J, Moller K. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during early orthostatic exercise in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: Further exploratory analyses from a randomized clinical feasibility trial. J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Oct;92:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.047. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
PMID: 34509259DERIVEDRiberholt CG, Olsen MH, Sondergaard CB, Gluud C, Ovesen C, Jakobsen JC, Mehlsen J, Moller K. Early Orthostatic Exercise by Head-Up Tilt With Stepping vs. Standard Care After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Is Feasible. Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 14;12:626014. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626014. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33935935DERIVEDRiberholt CG, Lindschou J, Gluud C, Mehlsen J, Moller K. Early mobilisation by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury - Protocol for a randomised clinical feasibility trial. Trials. 2018 Nov 8;19(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3004-x.
PMID: 30409170DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kirsten Møller, Professor
Rigshospitalet, Dept. of anaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2016
First Posted
October 5, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 24, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05