Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-guided Algorithmic Approach With a New LBBB After TAVI
COME-TAVI
Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) a Bayesian Randomized Trial (COME-TAVI)
1 other identifier
interventional
250
2 countries
10
Brief Summary
The primary hypothesis of the proposed study is that an electrophysiology-based algorithmic approach is superior to standard clinical follow-up with 30-day monitoring in reducing the combined endpoint of syncope, hospitalization, and death in patients in patients with new of left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
May 8, 2025
May 1, 2025
9.1 years
May 6, 2016
May 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with cardiovascular hospitalization, and/or syncope, and/or death after TAVI.
This is the number of participants who experienced cardiovascular hospitalizations, and/or syncope, and/or death after TAVI.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of participants with cardiovascular hospitalizations.
12 months
Number of participants with hospitalisations (Total)
12 months
Number of participants with emergency visits.
12 months
Number of participants experiencing syncope
12 months
Cost-effectiveness of EP-guided procedure compared to cardiac monitoring [incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER)].
12 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EP-based approach/pacemaker implant
OTHERSubjects will undergo an EP study prior to hospital discharge and will receive a pacemaker implantation if the HV interval is ≥65 msec. In the case where the electrical slowdown is not confirmed by the electrophysiological study, the participant will not have a pacemaker implantation.
Compared transcutaneous cardiac monitor
OTHERSubjects will undergo a minimum of 72 hour ECG monitoring in hospital and receive transcutaneous monitoring prior to hospital discharge for a duration of 30 days.
Interventions
Patient will be in the electrophysiology laboratory. The doctor will freeze the groin area and a medication may be given to help the patient relax. A catheter will be inserted into the groin up to the heart and the heart's electrical system will be recorded.
Transcutaneous cardiac patches will allow continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for a 30-day period. For the first randomized patients at the Montreal Heart Institute, Icentia was used and then was changed to a m-Health® device which allows continuous cardiac monitoring. The PocketECG from m-Health® is attached to 3 electrodes on the chest and contains a SIM card that transmits to a server located in Burlington, Ontario .The COME-TAVI coordinating center and the associated site will be informed rapidly of any events that occur . These events include: Ventricular fibrillation; Sustained ventricular tachycardia Any RR interval \>5 sec; Third-degree AV block or Mobitz 2 AV block;
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Informed consent to participate
- Persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI implantation (i.e. present at day 2)
You may not qualify if:
- Prior pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) or LBBB (i.e., prior to TAVI)
- Class I or IIA indication for PPM implantation according to management guidelines
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
New Brunswick Heart Center
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
QEII Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Center (LHSC)
London, Ontario, Canada
University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI)
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, H1T1C8, Canada
CIUSSS du Nord de l'Île de Mtl
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1J 3H5, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Nantes, Cedex 01, France
Related Publications (1)
Rivard L, Nault I, Krahn AD, Daneault B, Roux JF, Natarajan M, Healey JS, Quadros K, Sandhu RK, Kouz R, Greiss I, Leong-Sit P, Gourraud JB, Ben Ali W, Asgar A, Aguilar M, Bonan R, Cadrin-Tourigny J, Cartier R, Dorval JF, Dubuc M, Durrleman N, Dyrda K, Guerra P, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim R, Macle L, Mondesert B, Moss E, Raymond-Paquin A, Roy D, Tadros R, Thibault B, Talajic M, Nozza A, Guertin MC, Khairy P. Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block. CJC Open. 2023 Jul 13;5(8):611-618. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.05.009. eCollection 2023 Aug.
PMID: 37720184DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Léna Rivard, MD, MSC
Montreal Heart Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2016
First Posted
October 6, 2017
Study Start
October 15, 2017
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share