Study Stopped
Slow accrual following suspension per COVID-19
PSMA PET and MRI in Gynecological Cancers
PSMA Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging in Gynecological Cancers
6 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this research is to determine the accuracy of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) and multi-parametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to detect the presence of gynecological cancer cells in the body.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Nov 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2023
CompletedSeptember 5, 2023
July 1, 2023
2.2 years
August 18, 2017
May 10, 2023
August 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Accuracy
Estimate the frequency with which PSMA PET and MR imaging and final IHC staining disagree in their classifications of presence of disease.
up to 1 day
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Biodistribution of PSMA Measured by SUVmax in Normal Tissue
up to 1 day
Biodistribution of PSMA Measured by SUVmax in Cancer Tissue
up to 1 day
Radiodosimetry of PSMA
up to 1 day
Sensitivity and Specificity of PSMA-based PET/MR
up to 1 day
Study Arms (3)
Healthy Control Non-Dosimetry Group
OTHERThe control group will consists of women with no imaging evidence of gynecological cancer, who are undergoing hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. Women will receive PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL tracer and PET/MR imaging. n=6
Patient Group
OTHERThe patient group will consist of women with suspected gynecological cancers who are undergoing hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. Women will receive standard of care PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL tracer and PET/MR imaging. n=40
Dosimetry Group
OTHERWomen with or without suspected gynecological cancer. Women will receive PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL tracer and PET/CT imaging, PET/MR imaging as needed. n=6
Interventions
PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET tracer that will be used to determine the presence or absence of cancer
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with no suspected gynecological cancer.
- No contraindications for MR or PET imaging.
- Greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
- Scheduled to undergo a hysterectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy
- Women with or without suspected gynecological cancer.
- No contraindications for MR or PET imaging.
- Greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
- Women with known or suspected gynecological cancer
- No contraindications for MR or PET imaging.
- Greater than or equal to 18 years
- Have had or are scheduled to undergo a hysterectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Women that are pregnant or breast-feeding.
- Age \<18
- Inability to provide informed consent on their own behalf
- Severe kidney dysfunction (GFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kunikowska J, Bizon M, Pelka K, Derlatka P, Olszewski M, Krolicki L. 68 Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Ovarian Tumors : Potential to Differentiate Benign and Malignant Tumors Before Surgery: A Preliminary Report. Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Feb 1;48(2):e60-e66. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004486. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
PMID: 36512649DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Calculating accuracy, sensitivity and specificity relies on the IHC staining as the gold standard. IHC staining was not done because the study was terminated due to low recruitment and loss of funds. Because the IHC staining was not performed, there is no gold standard by which to perform accuracy, sensitivity and specificity analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Elizabeth Sadowski, MD
- Organization
- UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steve Cho, MD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Sadowski, MD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2017
First Posted
October 4, 2017
Study Start
November 15, 2017
Primary Completion
January 20, 2020
Study Completion
January 20, 2020
Last Updated
September 5, 2023
Results First Posted
August 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07