The HOPE Trial and the SMART Study
The HOPE Trial: Helping Our Patients Excel, and The SMART Study: Symptom Management and Reporting
2 other identifiers
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research study is evaluating a new smartphone application named the "Helping Our Patients Excel (HOPE)" app with a Fitbit device. The SMART Study is a sub-study of the HOPE Trial. Both studies evaluate an almost identical intervention using a Fitbit device and smartphone app(s) with the goal of improving quality-of-life for women with gynecologic cancers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 2, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 21, 2023
CompletedSeptember 9, 2025
September 1, 2025
3.4 years
January 6, 2017
March 3, 2023
September 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility (≥60% Enrollment Rate of Eligible Patients; ≥70% Survey Adherence; ≥80% FitBit Adherence) and Acceptability (≥60% Would Recommend the Intervention; <30% Rate the Study as Burdensome/Wish They Had Not Participated) in HOPE Pre-Pilot (n=10)
This outcome was limited to the HOPE pre-pilot, consisting of 10 patients. This open pilot aimed to identify patient preference of Fitbit Zip or Fitbit Charge 2 and whether this study was burdensome. This outcome informed appropriate study procedures before launching to a larger study with four arms across multiple sites. Feasibility defined as (1) greater than or equal to 60% enrollment rate among eligible patients approached, (2) greater than or equal to 70% adherence to daily smartphone surveys, (3) greater than or equal to 80% adherence to Fitbits at least 4 days per week. Acceptability defined as responses to 3 questions: (1) "Participating in this study placed a substantial burden on me." (2) "I wish I had not agreed to participate in this study." and (3) "I would recommend the application to a friend going through treatment."
30 days
Number of Participants Who Preferred the FitBit Zip vs. Number of Participants Who Preferred the FitBit Charge HR in the HOPE Pre-Pilot Study (n=10)
This outcome was limited to the HOPE Pre-pilot, consisting of 10 patients. This open pilot aimed to identify patient preference of Fitbit Zip or Fitbit Charge 2 and whether this study was burdensome. This outcome informed appropriate study procedures before launching to a larger study with four arms across multiple sites. This outcome is participant preference of the Fitbit Zip vs. Fitbit Charge in the HOPE Pre-Pilot study.
30 days
Feasibility (i.e. ≥50% 3-month Adherence Rates to Both Smartphone Apps and the Wearable Accelerometer) in the SMART Study
SMART Study: Participants received the Fitbit Charge 2 and access to the smartphone app. The app presented tailored advice if one or more low-risk symptoms were reported and prompted the patient to call their clinician for high-risk symptoms. Feasibility will be defined as greater than or equal to 50% 3-month adherence rates to both smartphone apps and the wearable accelerometer.
90 days
Acceptability (i.e. ≥60% of Study Participants Would Recommend the Intervention to Other Patients; and <30% of Patients Rate the Study as Burdensome or Wish They Had Not Participated) in the SMART Study
SMART Study: Participants received the Fitbit Charge 2 and access to the smartphone app. The app presented tailored advice if one or more low-risk symptoms were reported and prompted the patient to call their clinician for high-risk symptoms. Acceptability defined as responses to three questions: (1) "Participating in this study placed a substantial burden on me."; (2) "I wish I had not agreed to participate in this study."; and (3) "I would recommend the application to a friend going through treatment."
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Anxiety as Assessed by GAD-7 (HOPE RCT)
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days (Phase II)
Depression as Assessed by PHQ-9 (HOPE RCT)
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days (Phase II)
Patient Well-being as Assessed by FACIT-Pal (HOPE RCT)
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days (Phase II)
Constipation as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days (Phase II)
Diarrhea as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days (Phase II)
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Comparing Steps Collected by Accelerometer (HOPE)
EXPERIMENTAL* 10 patients will be enrolled in stage 1 to refine the HOPE App intervention * All participants will receive : * HOPE App * The Fitbit Zip * The Fitbit Charge 2 The amount of step collected by each device will be compared. This will allow the team to identify which wearable accelerometer to use in stage 2
Usual care (HOPE)
OTHERStage 2 will consist of arm 2-5 and will enroll 100 randomized patients. * Usual care * The app will also collect passive data from the smartphone
Wearable accelerometer (HOPE)
EXPERIMENTAL* Participants will be asked to wear the Fitbit * The Hope App will measure daily steps * The app will also collect passive data from the smartphone
Refined smartphone app (HOPE)
EXPERIMENTAL* Participants will be prompted to answer questions about their quality of life and physical health daily * The HOPE App will present tailored advice to improve symptoms if one or more low-risk toxicities are reported. If the symptoms are determined to be high-risk, the App will prompt the patient to call their clinician. * The app will also collect passive data from the smartphone
Refined smartphone app and accelerometer (HOPE)
EXPERIMENTAL* Participants will be prompted to answer questions about their quality of life and physical health daily * The HOPE App will present tailored advice to improve symptoms if one or more low-risk toxicities are reported. If the symptoms are determined to be high-risk, the App will prompt the patient to call their clinician. Participants will be asked to wear the Fitbit -The Hope App will measure daily steps The app will also collect passive data from the smartphone
SMART Study Arm
EXPERIMENTAL* Two smartphone apps and a wearable accelerometer (Fitbit) in 30 patients with gynecologic cancers receiving chemotherapy at two NCI Community Oncology sites. * The SMART intervention refers to the combination of both smartphone apps (SMART app and Beiwe app) and the accelerometer (Fitbit). * The SMART app is the technology that is actively collecting symptom reporting information from patients (e.g. patients are receiving surveys, recording their symptoms daily, and receiving tailored symptom management materials on their phone in response). * The Beiwe app is the technology involved in the passive data collection of participants' symptoms (GPS and accelerometer data) without their involvement.
Interventions
HOPE App
Fitbit Charge 2
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women ≥18 years of age
- Who plan to receive chemotherapy at DFCI to treat recurrent, incurable gynecologic cancers (ovarian, uterine, cervical) that have recurred despite ≥1 prior treatments.
- Own a smart-phone (Android or iOS)
- Capable of downloading and running the study app without assistance
- Can read and provide informed consent in English
- Do not have cognitive or visual impairments that would preclude use of the app.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be ineligible if they are participating in an investigational drug treatment trial that requires structured symptom or toxicity reporting at the time of enrollment.
- Patients with severe cognitively impairments
- Who appear too weak
- Emotionally distraught
- Agitated or ill to participate, as judged by either the research study staff or an oncology provider, will be excluded.
- Patients who are unable to provide informed consent in English will be excluded because the smartphone app intervention is only available in English at this time.
- Children and young adults up to age 18 will be excluded because the diagnosis of metastatic gynecologic cancers in this age group is rare and the proposed instruments are not designed for people of those ages.
- Patients with a life expectancy of ≤6 months, as determined by their oncology providers, will be excluded since they cannot participate in all of the required data collection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Alexi Wright
- Organization
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexi A Wright, MD MPH
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Alexi. A Wright, MD, MPH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2017
First Posted
January 16, 2017
Study Start
April 12, 2017
Primary Completion
September 2, 2020
Study Completion
September 2, 2020
Last Updated
September 9, 2025
Results First Posted
April 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share