Comparison Between Initial Routine PICC and General IV Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-perceived Satisfaction Between Initial Routine Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Insertion and General Intravenous Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Randomized Phase II Study
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To establish the IV access strategy for terminally ill cancer patients, using comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (optional PICC group).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2017
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedAugust 25, 2020
August 1, 2020
3.2 years
September 19, 2017
August 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
IV access maintenance success rate
rate of successful PICC maintenance until death or discharge/transfer
From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
PICC related complication rate
From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
PICC premature removal rate
From date of enrollment until date of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years
PICC life span
From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
patient perceived procedure-related distress
5th day after procedure
patient perceived comfort and convenience assessed by a newly developed question in this study
3th to 7th day after enrollment
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Routine PICC group
EXPERIMENTALPICC is initially routine insertion at the time of admission of hospice-palliative care unit
General IV group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPICC is inserted if 3 or more times of IV insertion trial per day is required for IV access
Interventions
comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (general IV group)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cancer patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy and fulfilled all of the following conditions
- Patients with expected survival time of 3 months or less due to a progressive disease without additional anticancer treatment. (However, palliative radiation treatment for symptom control is allowed.)
- Patients who need the IV access route continuously for hydration or medication.
- Age18 or older
- Signed and dated informed consent of document indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed about all pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who showed severe coagulopathy such as thrombocytopenia (Platelet count ≤ 20,000/mm2) or international normalized ratio (INR) prolongation (≥2.0 ) in spite of treatment
- Patients who have an evidence of current sepsis (bacteremia or fungemia)
- 'current' means bacteremia/fungemia without eradication on follow-up peripheral blood culture
- patients with persistent fever (bacteremia or fungemia cannot be ruled out)
- Patients who is impracticable to PICC insertion due to uncontrolled behavioral disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea
Related Publications (8)
Cleeland CS. Cancer-related symptoms. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2000 Jul;10(3):175-90. doi: 10.1053/srao.2000.6590.
PMID: 11034629RESULTBruera E, Sala R, Rico MA, Moyano J, Centeno C, Willey J, Palmer JL. Effects of parenteral hydration in terminally ill cancer patients: a preliminary study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2366-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.069.
PMID: 15800328RESULTMercadante S, Ferrera P, Girelli D, Casuccio A. Patients' and relatives' perceptions about intravenous and subcutaneous hydration. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct;30(4):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.004.
PMID: 16256899RESULTLam S, Scannell R, Roessler D, Smith MA. Peripherally inserted central catheters in an acute-care hospital. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1833-7.
PMID: 8053751RESULTNg PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG, Maldonado L. Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997 Mar;72(3):225-33. doi: 10.4065/72.3.225.
PMID: 9070197RESULTRaad I, Davis S, Becker M, Hohn D, Houston D, Umphrey J, Bodey GP. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1791-6.
PMID: 8392831RESULTSmith JR, Friedell ML, Cheatham ML, Martin SP, Cohen MJ, Horowitz JD. Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited. Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2):208-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00121-4.
PMID: 9737634RESULTPark K, Jun HJ, Oh SY. Safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction of peripherally inserted central catheters in terminally ill cancer patients: a prospective multicenter observational study. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Dec;24(12):4987-4992. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3360-6. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
PMID: 27460015RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kwonoh Park, MD, PhD
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, clinical research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2017
First Posted
October 3, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
August 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share