NCT03299868

Brief Summary

To establish the IV access strategy for terminally ill cancer patients, using comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (optional PICC group).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 19, 2017

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 3, 2017

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 25, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

September 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Peripherally inserted central catheterTerminally ill cancer patientsPalliative care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • IV access maintenance success rate

    rate of successful PICC maintenance until death or discharge/transfer

    From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • PICC related complication rate

    From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years

  • PICC premature removal rate

    From date of enrollment until date of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years

  • PICC life span

    From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years

  • patient perceived procedure-related distress

    5th day after procedure

  • patient perceived comfort and convenience assessed by a newly developed question in this study

    3th to 7th day after enrollment

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Routine PICC group

EXPERIMENTAL

PICC is initially routine insertion at the time of admission of hospice-palliative care unit

Device: peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)

General IV group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PICC is inserted if 3 or more times of IV insertion trial per day is required for IV access

Device: peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)

Interventions

comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (general IV group)

General IV groupRoutine PICC group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Cancer patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy and fulfilled all of the following conditions
  • Patients with expected survival time of 3 months or less due to a progressive disease without additional anticancer treatment. (However, palliative radiation treatment for symptom control is allowed.)
  • Patients who need the IV access route continuously for hydration or medication.
  • Age18 or older
  • Signed and dated informed consent of document indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed about all pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who showed severe coagulopathy such as thrombocytopenia (Platelet count ≤ 20,000/mm2) or international normalized ratio (INR) prolongation (≥2.0 ) in spite of treatment
  • Patients who have an evidence of current sepsis (bacteremia or fungemia)
  • 'current' means bacteremia/fungemia without eradication on follow-up peripheral blood culture
  • patients with persistent fever (bacteremia or fungemia cannot be ruled out)
  • Patients who is impracticable to PICC insertion due to uncontrolled behavioral disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Cleeland CS. Cancer-related symptoms. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2000 Jul;10(3):175-90. doi: 10.1053/srao.2000.6590.

  • Bruera E, Sala R, Rico MA, Moyano J, Centeno C, Willey J, Palmer JL. Effects of parenteral hydration in terminally ill cancer patients: a preliminary study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2366-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.069.

  • Mercadante S, Ferrera P, Girelli D, Casuccio A. Patients' and relatives' perceptions about intravenous and subcutaneous hydration. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct;30(4):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.004.

  • Lam S, Scannell R, Roessler D, Smith MA. Peripherally inserted central catheters in an acute-care hospital. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1833-7.

  • Ng PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG, Maldonado L. Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997 Mar;72(3):225-33. doi: 10.4065/72.3.225.

  • Raad I, Davis S, Becker M, Hohn D, Houston D, Umphrey J, Bodey GP. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1791-6.

  • Smith JR, Friedell ML, Cheatham ML, Martin SP, Cohen MJ, Horowitz JD. Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited. Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2):208-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00121-4.

  • Park K, Jun HJ, Oh SY. Safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction of peripherally inserted central catheters in terminally ill cancer patients: a prospective multicenter observational study. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Dec;24(12):4987-4992. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3360-6. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Catheterization, Peripheral

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CatheterizationTherapeuticsEndovascular ProceduresVascular Surgical ProceduresCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Kwonoh Park, MD, PhD

    Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, Single institution, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 2
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, clinical research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2017

First Posted

October 3, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

June 30, 2020

Last Updated

August 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations