Comparing Arrow PICC Catheters w/ Arrowga+rd Blue Advanced Protection Performance and Safety to Unprotected PICC's
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Device Performance Characteristics and Safety of Arrow Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters With Arrowga+rd Blue Advanced Protection to Standard Unprotected PICCs
1 other identifier
interventional
444
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study seeks to compare the standard unprotected PICC with the AGBA PICC for placement success, incidence of venous thrombosis through duplex ultrasound, observing for signs and symptoms of thrombotic occlusion and recording treatment response when diagnosed by sluggish fluid flow, inability to aspirate blood and or difficulty/inability to infuse via a lumen or lumens of the catheter. The incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection will also be tracked during the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2023
CompletedJanuary 23, 2023
March 1, 2022
3.5 years
February 21, 2022
January 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
First attempt PICC insertion success
rate of first attempt insertion success = number of patients with first attempt insertion /total number of patients \*100% • First attempt insertion success and number of failed attempts will be documented
During placement
PICC Placement Success - Confirmation of tip placement in the lower 1/3 of the superior vena cava at or above the superior vena cava/right atrium junction will be performed by chest x-ray or other tip confirmation system/device and documented.
Once the PICC placement is complete, confirmation of catheter tip location in the lower 1/3 of the superior vena cava at or above the superior vena cava/right atrium junction will be performed by chest x-ray or other tip confirmation system/device and documented. Any adjustments to catheter length post-insertion must be performed using sterile technique and maximal barrier precautions. The number of adjustments to the inserted PICC needed to achieve proper tip location will be recorded.
During placement
Confirmation of tip patency by aspirating each lumen for brisk blood return and flushing each lumen with at least 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl injection USP
Once the PICC placement is complete, the inserter will confirm patency by aspirating each lumen for brisk blood return and flushing each lumen with at least 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl injection USP. For inpatients, each lumen will be assessed for patency at least every 12 hours and/or before administration of infusion therapies. Patency assessments will be documented. * Patency checks resulting in brisk blood return and ability to flush easily will be considered patent. * Patency checks resulting in inability to aspirate blood with ability to flush easily will be documented as a withdrawal occlusion. * Patency checks resulting in sluggish flow and/or ability to flush will be documented as a partial occlusion. * Patency checks resulting in inability to aspirate blood and inability to flush will be documented as a complete occlusion.
up to 92 days
Incidence of catheter related bloodstream infection assessed by laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection
Subjects will be assessed for laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI) as described below through one day post PICC removal LCBI 1 Patient of any age has a recognized pathogen, which is an organism not included on the NHSN common commensal list, identified from one or more blood specimens obtained by a culture or non-culture based microbiologic testing method (excluding organisms identified by testing on sera) AND Organism(s) identified in blood is not related to an infection at another site LCBI 2 Patient of any age has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: fever (\>38.0oC), chills, or hypotension AND Organism(s) identified in blood is not related to an infection at another site AND The same NHSN common commensal is identified by a culture or non-culture based microbiologic testing method, from two or more blood specimens collected on separate occasions.
up to 92 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Incidence of complete loss of catheter function versus the total number of effective catheters placed
up to 92 days
Incidence of catheter-associated external wall thrombosis versus the total number of effective catheters placed
up to 92 days
Device performance evaluation
During placement
Evaluation of other safety parameters such as Adverse Events and Device Defects during testing
up to 92 days
Study Arms (2)
Arrow PICC With Arrowga+rd Blue Advanced Protection
EXPERIMENTALThe Arrow PICC with Arrowga+rd Blue Advanced protection (Teleflex Medical Incorporated, Morrisville, NC, USA; hereafter referred to as "AGBA") is an FDA-cleared pressure injectable device that offers both antimicrobial and anti-thrombogenic protection for at least 30 days. The application of Arrowga+rd Blue Advanced protection uses a proprietary process whereby chlorhexidine is chemically bonded to the intra- luminal catheter surfaces from tip to hub, and extra-luminal catheter body. The device is cleared for marketing in the United States of America by the Food and Drug Administration, and has obtained the CE mark for marketing in the European Union. The French size and length selected for use will be documented.
Standard of Care PICC
SHAM COMPARATORThe standard, unprotected PICC currently in use at the institution will be used in this study (here after referred to as Standard). The details of the PICC selected will be recorded including brand, French size, and length.
Interventions
The PICC will be placed by a qualified healthcare professional, in accordance with institutional policies and procedures and the device's IFU.
The sham comparator PICC will be placed by a qualified healthcare professional, in accordance with institutional policies and procedures and the device's IFU.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients age ≥ 18 years requiring a PICC
- Patient will remain an inpatient for the entire dwell time
- Ability to comply with study requirements of duplex ultrasound procedures prior to and at the time of PICC removal
- Patients cognitively and physically able to give written consent to participate in the study or patient has a legally authorized representative (LAR) who may give written consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Current diagnosis of venous thrombosis within the venous tract of the proposed catheter
- Diagnosis of peripheral or central vein stenosis (on proposed insertion side)
- History or diagnosis of veno-occlusive disease
- Diagnosis of superior vena cava syndrome
- Known, pre-existing diagnosis of hypercoagulation disorder unrelated to underlying disease
- Previous enrollment in this study
- Currently pregnant or breast feeding
- Skin condition at or within 15 cm of the proposed catheter insertion site, including signs and symptoms of inflammation, rash, crusts, wounds with drainage, sites of intravenous infusion infiltration or extravasation, hematoma, phlebitis and or thrombophlebitis
- Medical, social, and/or psychological problems precluding subject from study participation
- Known allergy or sensitivity to chlorhexidine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Teleflexlead
Study Sites (5)
Beijing Hospital
Beijing, Doncheng District, 100730, China
The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Fengtai District, 100039, China
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Haidian District, 100191, China
The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Haidian District, 100853, China
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, Xicheng District, 100044, China
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Xiao H Zhang
Peking University People's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2022
First Posted
March 14, 2022
Study Start
January 16, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
January 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Permanently after trademark registrations
- Access Criteria
- Investigators whose proposed research has received IRB/EC approval
The Study protocol will be come available after the trademark has been registered to investigators whose proposed research has received IRB/EC approval