Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access Using AccuCath
AccuCath
Randomized, Controlled Study of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access Using AccuCath Versus Ultrasound-Guided Conventional Intravenous Catheter in the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
While peripheral venous cannulation is among the most common procedures performed in clinical settings, it is estimated that PIV insertion fails for 6 million patients annually. Failure to establish peripheral venous access in the emergency department is a costly problem, leading to delays in diagnostics and treatment and requiring alternative sites for vascular access. These alternative methods can lead to higher complications rates, decreased patient satisfaction, and increased utilization of nursing and physician time. Complications from PIV failure also pose a significant financial burden to the healthcare system. Ultrasound guidance has been shown to greatly improve the process of localizing vessels for cannulation. In a healthcare climate that is increasingly focused on outcomes and cost-effectiveness, ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation has become not only a viable but often the preferred method in patients with difficult venous access. Nevertheless, studies to date on ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation have revealed some shortcomings, such as premature failure and low first attempt success rates. The purpose of our study is to assess whether ultrasound-guided cannulation of a AccuCath catheter, which has a coiled tip guidewire, is superior to ultrasound-guided cannulation of a conventional peripheral IV catheter across clinical outcomes relevant to the emergency department setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 30, 2020
CompletedDecember 30, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.4 years
June 8, 2015
October 12, 2020
December 3, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First Attempt Success Rate
Rate of success of first attempt for IV access
During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
IV Procedure Time
During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours
Other Outcomes (5)
Total Number of Percutaneous Punctures
During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours
Total Number of IV Catheters
During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours
Patient Satisfaction Data
During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
AccuCath catheter
EXPERIMENTALWe use the AccuCath catheter with ultrasound guidance for IV access for patients in the experimental group.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe will use ultrasound-guided conventional IV for patients in the control group.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided insertion of an AccuCath catheter during a standard of care procedure.
Ultrasound-guided insertion of a conventional IV catheter during a standard of care procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients with IV access need
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of decisional capacity (e.g., intoxication, dementia, delirium, developmental delay), prior venous grafts or surgery at target IV site, not an acceptable candidate for ultrasound-guided PIV per Mitchell ED protocol (i.e. 3 failed attempts by nurses- 2 by primary nurse, 1 by senior nurse)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (21)
Adhikari S, Blaivas M, Morrison D, Lander L. Comparison of infection rates among ultrasound-guided versus traditionally placed peripheral intravenous lines. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 May;29(5):741-7. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.5.741.
PMID: 20427786BACKGROUNDAu AK, Rotte MJ, Grzybowski RJ, Ku BS, Fields JM. Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;30(9):1950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
PMID: 22795988BACKGROUNDFields JM, Piela NE, Au AK, Ku BS. Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
PMID: 25171796BACKGROUNDElia F, Ferrari G, Molino P, Converso M, De Filippi G, Milan A, Apra F. Standard-length catheters vs long catheters in ultrasound-guided peripheral vein cannulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):712-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.019. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
PMID: 21703801BACKGROUNDLapostolle F, Catineau J, Garrigue B, Monmarteau V, Houssaye T, Vecci I, Treoux V, Hospital B, Crocheton N, Adnet F. Prospective evaluation of peripheral venous access difficulty in emergency care. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1452-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0634-y. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
PMID: 17554524BACKGROUNDMahler SA, Wang H, Lester C, Skinner J, Arnold TC, Conrad SA. Short- vs long-axis approach to ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access: a prospective randomized study. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;29(9):1194-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
PMID: 20951527BACKGROUNDDargin JM, Rebholz CM, Lowenstein RA, Mitchell PM, Feldman JA. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;28(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.001.
PMID: 20006193BACKGROUNDMcGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011883. No abstract available.
PMID: 12646670BACKGROUNDLegler D, Nugent M. Doppler localization of the internal jugular vein facilitates central venous cannulation. Anesthesiology. 1984 May;60(5):481-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198405000-00016. No abstract available.
PMID: 6711857BACKGROUNDYonei A, Nonoue T, Sari A. Real-time ultrasonic guidance for percutaneous puncture of the internal jugular vein. Anesthesiology. 1986 Jun;64(6):830-1. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198606000-00033. No abstract available.
PMID: 3717653BACKGROUNDMiller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, Woody JR, Longmoor CE, Foster B. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Aug;9(8):800-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02168.x.
PMID: 12153885BACKGROUNDDenys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS. Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation. 1993 May;87(5):1557-62. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.5.1557.
PMID: 8491011BACKGROUNDCostantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, Fojtik JP. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;46(5):456-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.026.
PMID: 16271677BACKGROUNDRandolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996 Dec;24(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020.
PMID: 8968276BACKGROUNDMallory DL, McGee WT, Shawker TH, Brenner M, Bailey KR, Evans RG, Parker MM, Farmer JC, Parillo JE. Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of internal jugular vein cannulation. A prospective, randomized trial. Chest. 1990 Jul;98(1):157-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.1.157.
PMID: 2193776BACKGROUNDRothschild JM. Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization: making healthcare safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publication No. 01-E058. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety.
BACKGROUNDKeyes LE, Frazee BW, Snoey ER, Simon BC, Christy D. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;34(6):711-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70095-8.
PMID: 10577399BACKGROUNDThompson DR, Gualtiere E, Deppe S, et al. Greater success in subclavian vein cannulation using ultrasound for inexperienced operators. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:A189.
BACKGROUNDCatney MR, Hillis S, Wakefield B, Simpson L, Domino L, Keller S, Connelly T, White M, Price D, Wagner K. Relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter Dwell time and the development of phlebitis and infiltration. J Infus Nurs. 2001 Sep-Oct;24(5):332-41. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200109000-00008.
PMID: 11575049BACKGROUNDGregg SC, Murthi SB, Sisley AC, Stein DM, Scalea TM. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;25(3):514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
PMID: 19836193BACKGROUNDIdemoto BK, Rowbottom JR, Reynolds JD, Hickman Jr RL. The AccuCath Intravenous Catheter System With Retractable Coiled Tip Guidewire and Conventional Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Comparison. The Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2014;19(2):94-102.
BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Melanie Norstrom
- Organization
- University of Chicago
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yong Suh, MD MBA MSc
University of Chicago
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gregg Helland, MD
University of Chicago
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Spiegel, MD MBA
University of Chicago
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2015
First Posted
June 11, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 30, 2020
Results First Posted
December 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share