NCT02469038

Brief Summary

While peripheral venous cannulation is among the most common procedures performed in clinical settings, it is estimated that PIV insertion fails for 6 million patients annually. Failure to establish peripheral venous access in the emergency department is a costly problem, leading to delays in diagnostics and treatment and requiring alternative sites for vascular access. These alternative methods can lead to higher complications rates, decreased patient satisfaction, and increased utilization of nursing and physician time. Complications from PIV failure also pose a significant financial burden to the healthcare system. Ultrasound guidance has been shown to greatly improve the process of localizing vessels for cannulation. In a healthcare climate that is increasingly focused on outcomes and cost-effectiveness, ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation has become not only a viable but often the preferred method in patients with difficult venous access. Nevertheless, studies to date on ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation have revealed some shortcomings, such as premature failure and low first attempt success rates. The purpose of our study is to assess whether ultrasound-guided cannulation of a AccuCath catheter, which has a coiled tip guidewire, is superior to ultrasound-guided cannulation of a conventional peripheral IV catheter across clinical outcomes relevant to the emergency department setting.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2015

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2018

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 30, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 8, 2015

Results QC Date

October 12, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • First Attempt Success Rate

    Rate of success of first attempt for IV access

    During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • IV Procedure Time

    During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Total Number of Percutaneous Punctures

    During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours

  • Total Number of IV Catheters

    During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours

  • Patient Satisfaction Data

    During length of stay in emergency room up to 24 hours

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

AccuCath catheter

EXPERIMENTAL

We use the AccuCath catheter with ultrasound guidance for IV access for patients in the experimental group.

Device: AccuCath catheter

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

We will use ultrasound-guided conventional IV for patients in the control group.

Device: Control

Interventions

Ultrasound-guided insertion of an AccuCath catheter during a standard of care procedure.

Also known as: Group A
AccuCath catheter
ControlDEVICE

Ultrasound-guided insertion of a conventional IV catheter during a standard of care procedure.

Also known as: Group B, conventional IV catheter
Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients with IV access need

You may not qualify if:

  • Lack of decisional capacity (e.g., intoxication, dementia, delirium, developmental delay), prior venous grafts or surgery at target IV site, not an acceptable candidate for ultrasound-guided PIV per Mitchell ED protocol (i.e. 3 failed attempts by nurses- 2 by primary nurse, 1 by senior nurse)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (21)

  • Adhikari S, Blaivas M, Morrison D, Lander L. Comparison of infection rates among ultrasound-guided versus traditionally placed peripheral intravenous lines. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 May;29(5):741-7. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.5.741.

    PMID: 20427786BACKGROUND
  • Au AK, Rotte MJ, Grzybowski RJ, Ku BS, Fields JM. Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;30(9):1950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

    PMID: 22795988BACKGROUND
  • Fields JM, Piela NE, Au AK, Ku BS. Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

    PMID: 25171796BACKGROUND
  • Elia F, Ferrari G, Molino P, Converso M, De Filippi G, Milan A, Apra F. Standard-length catheters vs long catheters in ultrasound-guided peripheral vein cannulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):712-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.019. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

    PMID: 21703801BACKGROUND
  • Lapostolle F, Catineau J, Garrigue B, Monmarteau V, Houssaye T, Vecci I, Treoux V, Hospital B, Crocheton N, Adnet F. Prospective evaluation of peripheral venous access difficulty in emergency care. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1452-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0634-y. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

    PMID: 17554524BACKGROUND
  • Mahler SA, Wang H, Lester C, Skinner J, Arnold TC, Conrad SA. Short- vs long-axis approach to ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access: a prospective randomized study. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;29(9):1194-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

    PMID: 20951527BACKGROUND
  • Dargin JM, Rebholz CM, Lowenstein RA, Mitchell PM, Feldman JA. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;28(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.001.

    PMID: 20006193BACKGROUND
  • McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011883. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12646670BACKGROUND
  • Legler D, Nugent M. Doppler localization of the internal jugular vein facilitates central venous cannulation. Anesthesiology. 1984 May;60(5):481-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198405000-00016. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6711857BACKGROUND
  • Yonei A, Nonoue T, Sari A. Real-time ultrasonic guidance for percutaneous puncture of the internal jugular vein. Anesthesiology. 1986 Jun;64(6):830-1. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198606000-00033. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3717653BACKGROUND
  • Miller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, Woody JR, Longmoor CE, Foster B. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Aug;9(8):800-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02168.x.

    PMID: 12153885BACKGROUND
  • Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS. Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation. 1993 May;87(5):1557-62. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.5.1557.

    PMID: 8491011BACKGROUND
  • Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, Fojtik JP. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;46(5):456-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.026.

    PMID: 16271677BACKGROUND
  • Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996 Dec;24(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020.

    PMID: 8968276BACKGROUND
  • Mallory DL, McGee WT, Shawker TH, Brenner M, Bailey KR, Evans RG, Parker MM, Farmer JC, Parillo JE. Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of internal jugular vein cannulation. A prospective, randomized trial. Chest. 1990 Jul;98(1):157-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.1.157.

    PMID: 2193776BACKGROUND
  • Rothschild JM. Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization: making healthcare safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publication No. 01-E058. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety.

    BACKGROUND
  • Keyes LE, Frazee BW, Snoey ER, Simon BC, Christy D. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;34(6):711-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70095-8.

    PMID: 10577399BACKGROUND
  • Thompson DR, Gualtiere E, Deppe S, et al. Greater success in subclavian vein cannulation using ultrasound for inexperienced operators. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:A189.

    BACKGROUND
  • Catney MR, Hillis S, Wakefield B, Simpson L, Domino L, Keller S, Connelly T, White M, Price D, Wagner K. Relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter Dwell time and the development of phlebitis and infiltration. J Infus Nurs. 2001 Sep-Oct;24(5):332-41. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200109000-00008.

    PMID: 11575049BACKGROUND
  • Gregg SC, Murthi SB, Sisley AC, Stein DM, Scalea TM. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;25(3):514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

    PMID: 19836193BACKGROUND
  • Idemoto BK, Rowbottom JR, Reynolds JD, Hickman Jr RL. The AccuCath Intravenous Catheter System With Retractable Coiled Tip Guidewire and Conventional Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Comparison. The Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2014;19(2):94-102.

    BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Melanie Norstrom
Organization
University of Chicago

Study Officials

  • Yong Suh, MD MBA MSc

    University of Chicago

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gregg Helland, MD

    University of Chicago

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Thomas Spiegel, MD MBA

    University of Chicago

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2015

First Posted

June 11, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 1, 2018

Study Completion

June 1, 2018

Last Updated

December 30, 2020

Results First Posted

December 30, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share