NCT03296228

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to identify the flexibility radiograph(s) that can most accurately predict the curve behaviour after surgical correction of AIS. With these findings, the investigators hope to give further guidance for the selection of fusion levels and to incorporate different dynamic radiographs into the Lenke Classification, leading to a more universal application that can consistently lead to good surgical and clinical outcome.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
134

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 22, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 22, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

AIS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Investigate the flexibility equivalence of different bending methods, and their predictability of the final outcome

    To investigate the flexibility equivalence of different bending methods: supine side-bending, fulcrum bending (FB) and supine Halter traction without GA (awake), and their predictability of the final outcome

    6 months to 9 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Incorporate these findings into the Lenke Classification of AIS

    6 months to 9 months

  • Give new recommendations for fusion levels according to the flexibility assessment

    6 months to 9 months

Study Arms (2)

Hong Kong

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB) supine side-bending and fulcrum bending films

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB)

Turkey

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB) Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (awake traction) Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (STUGA) supine side-bending, fulcrum bending films, awake traction and supine traction under GA

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB)Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (awake traction)Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (STUGA)

Interventions

Supine, supine side-bend, fulcrum bend

Hong KongTurkey

awake traction

Turkey

supine traction under GA

Turkey

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study will be divided into two phases. In Phase 1, an exploratory pilot study will be performed with up to 3 flexibility films done on the same patient in different spinal centres which are in Hong Kong and Turkey.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with AIS who reach the threshold for surgical correction.
  • Patients aged 10 to 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Neuromuscular deformity
  • Prior fusion or spine surgery
  • Spinal tumor diagnosis
  • Congenital anomalies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Domanic U, Goksan SB. Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1637-42. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170580.92177.d2.

    PMID: 16025034BACKGROUND
  • Clements DH, Marks M, Newton PO, Betz RR, Lenke L, Shufflebarger H; Harms Study Group. Did the Lenke classification change scoliosis treatment? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun 15;36(14):1142-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318207e9c4.

    PMID: 21358471BACKGROUND
  • Cheh G, Lenke LG, Lehman RA Jr, Kim YJ, Nunley R, Bridwell KH. The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2668-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5269.

    PMID: 18007242BACKGROUND
  • Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1169-81.

    PMID: 11507125BACKGROUND
  • Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. 2003. Marcel Dekker, New York

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Supine Position

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PostureMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Dr Kenny Kwan, BMBCh(Oxon)

    The University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2017

First Posted

September 28, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2018

Study Completion

December 31, 2018

Last Updated

May 6, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations