Evaluating the Effectiveness of Posture Correction Girdle for Adolescents With Early Scoliosis
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Through the ITF-Tier 3 project (ITS/ 237/ 11), a prototype of the posture correction girdle based on the clinical, textile science, material and ergonomics engineering analyses has been developed for preteen and teenage girls aged 10 to 13 who have the early stages of scoliosis. The girdle provides a corrective force onto the torso by the warping and elastic extension of the shoulder straps and waistband and the insertion of semi-rigid EVA padding and uses a point-pressure support system to achieve the target of posture improvement and spinal progression control with physical and psychological comfort. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the posture correction girdle, it is proposed to recruit 10 patients to take low dose x-ray (sterEOS) at QMH at supine position. Then, the patient should wear the girdle for two hours and take another x-ray at standing position. If the Cobb's angle of the patient on girdle at standing position can be same as her supine position. It can prove the effectiveness of the girdle.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedNovember 18, 2021
November 1, 2021
6.2 years
July 18, 2017
November 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measure the spinal correction of posture correction girdle and hard brace
The Cobb angle (unit: degree) of posture correction girdle and hard brace will be compared and reported.
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Measure the pressure forces exerted by posture correction girdle and hard brace
2 weeks
Measure the spinal correction of posture correction girdle after 6 months
6 months
Measure the pressure changes of posture correction girdle after 6 months
6 months
Measurement of patient-related outcome of posture correction girdle and hard brace by EQ-5D-5L
6 months
Measurement of patient-related outcome of posture correction girdle and hard brace by SRS-22
6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Posture Correction Girdle
EXPERIMENTALOur research team has designed a prototype of posture correction girdle based on the clinical, textile science, material and ergonomics engineering analyses as an alternative to hard brace for AIS. The design of the posture correction girdle incorporates different mechanisms, such as 1) compression and pulling forces through a close fit of the intimate apparel, 2) lumbar flexion by using supporting belt, 3) transverse forces applied by inserting pads inside the pocket lining by using the principle of the 3-point pressure system.
Interventions
Our research team has designed a prototype of posture correction girdle based on the clinical, textile science, material and ergonomics engineering analyses as an alternative to hard brace for AIS. The design of the posture correction girdle incorporates different mechanisms, such as 1) compression and pulling forces through a close fit of the intimate apparel, 2) lumbar flexion by using supporting belt, 3) transverse forces applied by inserting pads inside the pocket lining by using the principle of the 3-point pressure system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Satisfy SRS criteria for bracing15
- Curretly treated for rigid underarm brace
- Primary Cobb angle between 25 to 40 degrees
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications for x-ray exposure
- Diagnosis of other musculoskeletal or developmental illness that might be responsible for the spinal curvature
- History of previous surgical or orthotic treatment for AIS
- Contraindications for pulmonary and / or exercise tests
- Psychiatric disorders
- Recent trauma
- Recent traumatic (emotional) event
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Prof Kenneth Cheung, MBBS (UK), MD (HK)
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2017
First Posted
April 26, 2019
Study Start
July 17, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
November 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share