Effectiveness of Three Dimensional Correction During in Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
1 other identifier
interventional
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to study the effectiveness of in-brace 3D scoliosis correction by comparing Rigo Chêneau orthoses (RCO) with conventional Traditional Boston-style thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSO) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients, following Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) recommendations for non-operative AIS management and research studies. This group of patients that reach the threshold for bracing have an intrinsic higher risk for curve progression. Hence, the proposed study will provide novel and high quality evidence to improve the efficacy of bracing in the non-operative treatment of AIS. This will contribute significantly to the betterment of public health by reducing the number of patients requiring surgical intervention. Ultimately, new evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the most effective type of scoliosis braces will benefit children diagnosed with AIS worldwide.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 3, 2025
CompletedFebruary 6, 2023
February 1, 2023
3 years
May 5, 2020
February 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of in-brace 3D scoliosis correction between RCO versus TLSO as determined by the difference in coronal Cobb angle pre- and one year post-treatment
To evaluate the effect of in-brace 3D scoliosis correction between RCO versus TLSO as determined by the difference in coronal Cobb angle pre- and one year post-treatment
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months up to 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Compare changes in sagittal plane radiological parameter between RCO versus TLSO by EOS Imaging System
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months up to 5 years
Compare changes in transverse plane radiological parameter between RCO versus TLSO by EOS Imaging System
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months up to 5 years
Compare changes in surface topography between RCO versus TLSO using Bunnell's scoliometer
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months up to 5 years
Compare changes in surface topography between RCO versus TLSO using clinical photography
baseline, 6 months, 12 months up to 5 years
Compare changes in surface topography between RCO versus TLSO using VITUS Smart XXL 3D body scanner system
baseline, 6 months, 12 months up to 5 years
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
RCO group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the experimental group will receive RCO fabrication with standard level of care for bracing, which consists of education on general exercises for spinal movement, strengthening, and balancing. These patients will attend study assessments at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and every year until they reach skeletal maturity or if surgical intervention is required.
TLSO group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the experimental group will receive TLSO fabrication with standard level of care for bracing, which consists of education on general exercises for spinal movement, strengthening, and balancing. These patients will attend study assessments at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and every year until they reach skeletal maturity or if surgical intervention is required.
Interventions
Patients in the experimental group will receive RCO fabrication with standard level of care for bracing, which consists of education on general exercises for spinal movement, strengthening, and balancing. These patients will attend study assessments at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and every year until they reach skeletal maturity or if surgical intervention is required.
Patients in the experimental group will receive TLSO fabrication with standard level of care for bracing, which consists of education on general exercises for spinal movement, strengthening, and balancing. These patients will attend study assessments at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and every year until they reach skeletal maturity or if surgical intervention is required.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of AIS
- Male or female from 10 to 15 year-old, inclusive, at the time of consent provided
- Skeletal immaturity, defined as a Risser grade (amount of ossification and eventual fusion of the iliac apophysis) of 0, 1, or 2
- Cobb angle of 25-40
- No prior conservative or surgical treatment for AIS
You may not qualify if:
- An underlying cause or association that may cause scoliosis
- Leg length discrepancies or lower limb deformities that may interfere with spinal posture
- Previous spinal surgery
- Cognitive impairment
- Those receiving any other forms of treatment including alternative medicine for the treatment of their scoliosis
- Those who are unable to return for follow-up to complete the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Kenny Kwan, BMBCh (Oxon)
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Assessor, statistician and investigator blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2020
First Posted
May 11, 2020
Study Start
July 2, 2022
Primary Completion
July 3, 2025
Study Completion
December 3, 2025
Last Updated
February 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share