Adaptive Design Study of NEST sTMS in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder
A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Adaptive Design Study to Confirm the Safety and Efficacy of NEST sTMS in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder Who Have Not Responded to at Least One Antidepressant Medication in the Current Episode
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
14
Brief Summary
This is a double-blind, sham controlled, multi-center study to confirm the safety and efficacy of synchronized transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) for the treatment of patients currently experiencing an episode of depression who have failed to respond to at least one (1) antidepressant medication. Patients will be randomly assigned to either active or sham therapy and will undergo daily treatments for a period of time. Following completion of blinded treatments, patients may be eligible for a course of open label treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 5, 2021
CompletedSeptember 5, 2021
August 1, 2021
1.3 years
September 18, 2017
July 12, 2021
August 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Clinical Response (Reduction of At Least 50% in Baseline HAMD-17 Score) in Per-Protocol Population
Number of participants at the end of each treatment week who saw a reduction of at least 50% in baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores from baseline to week 6, compared between the active treatment and sham-controlled groups. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) system asks 17 questions to rank subject on a scale ranges between 0-52, with higher numbers indicating more severe symptoms. 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates moderate to severe depression.
Baseline (Day 0) to End of Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean Change (SD) in HAMD-17 Scores From Baseline to End of Treatment
Baseline (Day 0) and End of Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Mean Change (SD) in MADRS Scores From Baseline to End of Treatment in the Per-Protocol Population
Baseline (Day 0) and End of Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Responder Analysis: Mean Change (SD) in HAMD-17 Scores From Baseline to End of Treatment in Per-Protocol Patients With Individual Alpha Frequency Greater Than 9.8 Hz
Baseline (Day 0) and End of Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Mean Change (SD) in HAMD-17 Scores From Baseline to Week 6 of Open-Label Treatments
Baseline (sTMS Week 6/Sham Baseline) and End of Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Incidence of Clinical Response (Reduction of At Least 50% in Baseline HAMD-17 Score) in Open-Label Per-Protocol Population
Baseline (sTMS Week 6/Sham Baseline) and End of Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Study Arms (2)
Active sTMS
EXPERIMENTALSynchronized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sTMS) treatments to be administered using an active device 5 times per week for six treatment weeks.
Sham Stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORSham treatments to be administered using a sham device 5 times per week for six treatment weeks.
Interventions
sTMS delivers brain stimulation via a continuous magnetic field created by the device and set to the individual patient's intrinsic alpha frequency (IAF).
Sham stimulation is designed to look, sound and feel like the investigational device, but does not deliver magnetic stimulation to the brain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current episode of Major Depressive Disorder
- Inadequate response to at least one antidepressant medication in the current episode (Treatment Resistant Depression)
- Investigator able to identify IAF using EEG
- Willingness and ability to adhere to treatment schedule (5 treatments per week for six weeks)
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to unwilling to give informed consent
- Diagnosed with excluded conditions or treatment histories
- Currently hospitalized due to severity of depression symptoms
- Use of prohibited medications (as defined by protocol) within specified time frame of randomization
- Use of certain cardiac devices
- Use of certain intracranial devices
- Currently pregnant or unwilling to practice acceptable means of birth control, and women who are breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Kadima Neuropsychiatry Institute
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
UCLA Westwood - Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior
Los Angeles, California, 90024, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
Sheppard Pratt Health System
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
New York University
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Butler Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Brain Health Consultants
Houston, Texas, 77046, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
* Sham device used exaggerated vibration at the IAF which may have provided active treatment in the form of trigeminal nerve stimulation * Short wash-out period may have negatively impacted results. * Short treatment duration may limit efficacy
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Meagan Kovacs, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs Manager
- Organization
- Wave Neuroscience
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Leuchter, MD
University of California, Los Angeles
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double-Blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2017
First Posted
September 20, 2017
Study Start
November 27, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
September 5, 2021
Results First Posted
September 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share