Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity
Effectiveness of Sylc Air Abrasion Bioactive Glass Technology Versus Fluoride Varnish Application in Management of Hypersensitivity of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Will the use of Bioactive glass with air abrasion technology (Sylc) compared to Fluoride Varnish (Biflourid 10) affects the degree of pain in patients complaining from hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Oct 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedJanuary 31, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.2 years
September 11, 2017
January 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions stimulated by air blast measured by a 10 cm visual analogue scale VAS
2 minutes after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
1 week
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
2 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
3 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
4 weeks
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
6 months
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
sylc bioactive glass
EXPERIMENTALSylc is a dry powder (calcium sodium phosphosilicate), based on NovaMin powder. Bottle of small and coarse particles will be used for the treatment. Steps: 1. Isolation: D.M. will make proper isolation for the teeth using cotton rolls. 2. Hand piece: NSK Prophymate Neo will be used to deliver the powder particles on the sensitive areas. Air stream adjusted at 40-46 psi. 3. Application: The hand piece will be held at constant distance (3-4mm) away from the tooth surface, with 60-80 degrees on the buccal surfaces. The powder will be applied for 5-10 seconds per tooth in a circular movement. 4. Suction: High volume suction will be used on lingual side of the teeth to suck any particles, and avoid patient from swallowing it.
fluoride varnish (Bifluorid 10)
ACTIVE COMPARATORfluoride varnish Bifluorid 10(by VOCO) will be used. It is a rapid- drying suspension of equal amounts of sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride. The single dose form will be used, to make sure the amount of fluoride varnish used is standardized. Steps: 1. Preparation: The tooth will be properly cleaned, and the surface will be air-dried. 2. Dispensing: The foil will be pierced using a micro- tim, the opening will be enlarged, the brush will be wet in a circular movement. 3. Application: Thin coat will be applied on the tooth surface. The varnish will be left from 10-20 seconds then air dried. Concerning the storage of the Bifluoride 10, it will be stored in refrigerator at the operative clinic to avoid exposure to high temperature or sunlight.
Interventions
a dry powder (calcium sodium phosphosilicate), based on NovaMin powder. Bottle of small and coarse particles will be used for the treatment
It is a rapid- drying suspension of equal amounts of sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females.
- Age: 18-70 years old.
- Patients with good oral hygiene.
- Co-operative patients who show interest to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with bad oral hygiene.
- Patients with orthodontic appliances, or bridge work that might interfere with evaluation.
- Patients who did any periodontal surgeries within the previous 6 months.
- Patients who are allergic to any ingredients will be used in the study.
- Pregnant and lactating women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dina E Mohamed, Master
Assistant lecturer, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- double blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2017
First Posted
September 18, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01