Effect of Different Desensitizing Agents on Post-bleaching Hypersensitivity and Shade Stability
The Effect of Different Desensitizing Agents on Post-bleaching Hypersensitivity, Shade Stability and Surface Properties of Bleached Enamel. An In-vitro and In-vivo Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compared the effect of four different desensitizing agents on shade stability and dental hypersensitivity following dental bleaching procedure. The follow-up periods ranged from 24 hours to 1 year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2024
CompletedApril 23, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.8 years
April 6, 2024
April 20, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Post-bleaching hypersensitivity
Assessment was carried out by a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (no tooth sensitivity at all) to 10 (intolerable pain). The air stimulus was applied at a distance of 0.5-1 cm for 2 seconds by the maximum power of the compressed air jet from the dental unit. Then patients were asked to describe the intensity of pain by numbers from 1 to 10. Sensitivity was measured before bleaching (baseline) and at each follow up period, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching.
24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching
Shade stability
Assessment was carried out using Vita Easy-Shade V. Two measurements were taken for each tooth from the upper right canine to the upper left canine, and same for the lower arch. For light condition standardization, all shade measurements were carried out under natural daylight in combination with constant artificial light sources; the clinic overhead lights in combination with the dental unit light directed away from the patient. The shade of each tooth was recorded as well as the values of L, a, and b. The shade of the upper two centrals was confirmed using Vita classical shade guide. Shade assessment was carried out before bleaching, and at each follow up period, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching.
24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching
Study Arms (4)
After whitening mousse
EXPERIMENTAL30 % Xylitol, 4.2 % potassium nitrate, and 1450 ppm fluoride. Topical tooth gel Gel was applied on bleached teeth for 10 minutes according to manufacturer's instructions.
Mi Paste Plus
EXPERIMENTALCasein-phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with 0.2 % sodium fluoride (900ppm) Topical tooth cream Cream was applied on bleached teeth for 3 minutes according to manufacturer's instructions
Hydroxyapatite and Fluoride (ReminPro)
EXPERIMENTALHydroxyapatite (calcium and phosphate), ethanolic colophony, fluoride (1450 ppm NaF) and xylitol Topical water based tooth cream Cream was applied on bleached teeth for 3 minutes according to manufacturer's instructions
PAMAM "poly (amido amine)" dendrimer
EXPERIMENTALPAMAM-succinamic acid dendrimer, 1,4-diaminobutane core, generation 4 solution. 10 wt.% in water Colorless liquid The liquid was applied on bleached teeth for 30 minutes (according to previous studies)
Interventions
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of the desensitizing agent recommended by the manufacturer (After Whitening Mousse), once for 10 minutes.
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of Mi Paste Plus once for 3 minutes.
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of Hydroxyapatite and Fluoride (ReminPro) once for 3 minutes.
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of PAMAM once for 30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants with their entire upper and lower teeth, from right first premolar to left first premolar, present and sound, without restorations or periodontal disease.
- The participants had low-caries index scores.
- Participants had teeth with a Vita-color shade of A2 or darker.
- Cooperative behavior patient and medically free.
- Patient ages between 18 to 40 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Serious medically compromised patients.
- Smoking, alcoholism.
- Hypersensitivity to the agents used in the study.
- Lactating, pregnant patients.
- Patients with serious oral diseases, as acute necrotizing gingivitis, acute gingiva stomatitis, or those undergoing orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with dental enamel cracks.
- Patients who've had previous bleaching treatments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
Cairo, El Weilli, 4393005, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Farid MS El-Askary, Professor
Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This clinical trial was double blinded trial in which both the participant and outcome assessor were blinded to allocation, thus the participant was unaware of which experimental material had been assigned to him/her. Also the outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment that each participant had received.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2024
First Posted
April 11, 2024
Study Start
November 13, 2021
Primary Completion
August 25, 2023
Study Completion
September 20, 2023
Last Updated
April 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share