Comparative Effectiveness of FITs With Colonoscopy
BestFIT
1 other identifier
observational
3,761
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Colorectal cancer is a preventable and/or a treatable cancer, but at least 43% of the United States population is not up-to-date with screening. Although 90% of colorectal cancer screening is done using colonoscopy, most other countries use fecal immunochemical tests, reserving colonoscopy for those with a positive fecal immunochemical test. This project will provide the foundation for a paradigm shift for colorectal cancer screening in the United States by identifying how well 5 different FITs work for detecting screening relevant neoplasia, thus reducing morbidity and mortality for colorectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2023
CompletedAugust 2, 2024
July 1, 2024
5.4 years
August 21, 2017
July 31, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Advanced adenoma or cancer as assessed by colonoscopy with biopsy if needed
Individual FIT brand results of negative, positive, or invalid
About 21 days from collection of FIT to performance of colonoscopy
Study Arms (1)
Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Group
Each participant will complete 5 different FITs, on a single stool sample collected in a hat. Each participant will undergo optical colonoscopy and their FIT results compared with their colonoscopy with biopsy results (if applicable). We will calculate the test characteristics of each FIT.
Interventions
FIT is a type of fecal occult blood test that uses antibodies to hemoglobin to detect blood in stool.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients being scheduled for screening or surveillance colonoscopies meeting the study criteria at three academic health centers
You may qualify if:
- scheduled for a screening or surveillance colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- familial polyposis syndromes: ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease: or active rectal bleeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Barcey T. Levylead
- University of North Carolinacollaborator
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Centercollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
El Paso, Texas, 79924, United States
Related Publications (26)
Smith RA, Andrews K, Brooks D, DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Lortet-Tieulent J, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brawley OW, Wender RC. Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):96-114. doi: 10.3322/caac.21336. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
PMID: 26797525BACKGROUNDKuntz KM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Savarino JE, Feuer EJ, Zauber AG. A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: the role of assumptions about adenoma progression. Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):530-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11408730. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
PMID: 21673186BACKGROUNDYoung GP, Symonds EL, Allison JE, Cole SR, Fraser CG, Halloran SP, Kuipers EJ, Seaman HE. Advances in Fecal Occult Blood Tests: the FIT revolution. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):609-22. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3445-3. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
PMID: 25492500BACKGROUNDFedewa SA, Sauer AG, Siegel RL, Jemal A. Prevalence of major risk factors and use of screening tests for cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):637-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0134.
PMID: 25834147BACKGROUNDRobertson DJ, Imperiale TF. Stool Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct;149(5):1286-93. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.045. Epub 2015 May 30.
PMID: 26033632BACKGROUNDAllison JE. The best screening test for colorectal cancer is the one that gets done well. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.032. No abstract available.
PMID: 20152313BACKGROUNDHawley ST, Volk RJ, Krishnamurthy P, Jibaja-Weiss M, Vernon SW, Kneuper S. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients. Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S10-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d932e.
PMID: 18725820BACKGROUNDWolf RL, Basch CE, Brouse CH, Shmukler C, Shea S. Patient preferences and adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population. Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):809-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.049684. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
PMID: 16571715BACKGROUNDXu Y, Levy BT, Daly JM, Bergus GR, Dunkelberg JC. Comparison of patient preferences for fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy using the analytic hierarchy process. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 23;15:175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0841-0.
PMID: 25902770BACKGROUNDZauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):659-69. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00244. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
PMID: 18838717BACKGROUNDZavoral M, Suchanek S, Majek O, Fric P, Minarikova P, Minarik M, Seifert B, Dusek L. Colorectal cancer screening: 20 years of development and recent progress. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):3825-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3825.
PMID: 24744575BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use--United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Nov 8;62(44):881-8.
PMID: 24196665BACKGROUNDZavoral M, Suchanek S, Zavada F, Dusek L, Muzik J, Seifert B, Fric P. Colorectal cancer screening in Europe. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec 21;15(47):5907-15. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5907.
PMID: 20014454BACKGROUNDde Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, Meijer GA, van Ballegooijen M, van Roon AH, Stegeman I, Kraaijenhagen RA, Fockens P, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E, Kuipers EJ. Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;107(10):1570-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.249. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
PMID: 22850431BACKGROUNDLevi Z, Rozen P, Hazazi R, Vilkin A, Waked A, Maoz E, Birkenfeld S, Leshno M, Niv Y. A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00003.
PMID: 17310048BACKGROUNDSeeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR, Manninen DL, Given LS, Dong FB, Winges LD, McKenna MT. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004 Dec;127(6):1670-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051.
PMID: 15578503BACKGROUNDSharara AI, El Reda ZD, Harb AH, Abou Fadel CG, Sarkis FS, Chalhoub JM, Abou Mrad R. The burden of bowel preparations in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):314-8. doi: 10.1177/2050640615594550. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
PMID: 27087962BACKGROUNDImperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Levin TR, Lavin P, Lidgard GP, Ahlquist DA, Berger BM. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1287-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311194. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
PMID: 24645800BACKGROUNDLevy BT, Bay C, Xu Y, Daly JM, Bergus G, Dunkelberg J, Moss C. Test characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy. J Med Screen. 2014 Sep;21(3):133-43. doi: 10.1177/0969141314541109. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
PMID: 24958730BACKGROUNDLevi Z, Rozen P, Hazazi R, Vilkin A, Waked A, Maoz E, Birkenfeld S, Lieberman N, Klang S, Niv Y. Sensitivity, but not specificity, of a quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for neoplasia is slightly increased by the use of low-dose aspirin, NSAIDs, and anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;104(4):933-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.14. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
PMID: 19293792BACKGROUNDCrouse AL, De Koning L, Sadrzadeh SM, Naugler C. Sensitivity and Specificity of Community Fecal Immunotesting Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma in a High-Risk Canadian Population. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Nov;139(11):1441-5. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0454-OA.
PMID: 26516941BACKGROUNDRozen P, Comaneshter D, Levi Z, Hazazi R, Vilkin A, Maoz E, Birkenfeld S, Niv Y. Cumulative evaluation of a quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test to determine its optimal clinical use. Cancer. 2010 May 1;116(9):2115-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25012.
PMID: 20186820BACKGROUNDDaly JM, Xu Y, Crockett SD, Hoffman RM, Levy BT. Is Cognitive Impairment Associated with Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy? J Am Board Fam Med. 2025 Sep 15;38(3):423-430. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240338R1.
PMID: 40789626DERIVEDLevy BT, Xu Y, Daly JM, Hoffman RM, Dawson JD, Shokar NK, Zuckerman MJ, Molokwu J, Reuland DS, Crockett SD. Comparative Performance of Common Fecal Immunochemical Tests : A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Oct;177(10):1350-1360. doi: 10.7326/M24-0080. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
PMID: 39222513DERIVEDDaly JM, Xu Y, Crockett SD, Schmidt ME, Kim P, Levy BT. Clock-Drawing Test as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment Associated With Fecal Immunochemical Test Collection Errors. Ann Fam Med. 2022 Sep-Oct;20(5):452-459. doi: 10.1370/afm.2855.
PMID: 36228064DERIVEDLevy BT, Daly JM, Xu Y, Crockett SD, Hoffman RM, Dawson JD, Parang K, Shokar NK, Reuland DS, Zuckerman MJ, Levin A. Comparative effectiveness of five fecal immunochemical tests using colonoscopy as the gold standard: study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106430. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106430. Epub 2021 May 8.
PMID: 33974994DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barcey T Levy, PhD, MD
University of Iowa
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2017
First Posted
August 29, 2017
Study Start
October 2, 2017
Primary Completion
March 7, 2023
Study Completion
October 1, 2023
Last Updated
August 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Once study key publications have been accepted and finalized for publication.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers have to make a formal proposal for data and codebook.
Once the key publications are accepted and finalized, de-identified data and the codebook will be made available to anyone with a legitimate request who follows the Data Sharing agreement.