TTFields In GErmany in Routine Clinical Care
TIGER
The Use of TTFields for Newly Diagnosed GBM Patients in Germany in Routine Clinical Care - TIGER Study
1 other identifier
observational
710
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this post-authorisation medical device study is to obtain real life data on the use of tumor-treating fields (TTFields) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM in routine clinical care in Germany. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM and clinical indication for TTFields treatment will be enrolled in the study after signing Informed consent to use their data and process it centrally for research purposes. The clinical indication for TTFields is one of the inclusion criteria and is defined prior to inclusion by the treating physician. The patient's decision regarding TTFields treatment is part of the observation and will be assessed within the baseline visit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 31, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedJanuary 28, 2021
January 1, 2021
3.8 years
August 2, 2017
January 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Time to death of any cause (overall survival (OS)) from diagnosis
Time to death of any cause (overall survival (OS)) from diagnosis is measured using the patient data from date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause
through study completion, an average of 18 months (mean FU time)
Number of TTFields treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) standardized to one year of FU time
Number of TTFields treatment-related SAEs standardized to one year of follow-up (FU) is measured using the collection of SAEs during the follow-up period
through study completion, an average of 18 months (mean follow-up time)
Number of SAEs after start of TTFields treatment
Number of SAEs after start of TTFields treatment is measured using the collection of SAEs at the follow-up period
through study completion, an average of 18 months (mean follow-up time)
Time of usage (compliance) of TTFields treatment over time
Time of usage (compliance) of TTFields treatment over time is measured using the treatment compliance report at the Follow-up period
through study completion, an average of 18 months (mean follow-up time)
Time to first progression of GBM (progression-free survival (PFS)), defined within radiological and/or clinical/neurological assessment during routine clinical care in patients who started TTFields treatment at baseline
Time to first progression of GBM (progression-free survival (PFS)), defined within radiological and/or clinical/neurological assessment during routine clinical care in patients who started TTFields treatment at baseline from date of enrollment until the date of first progression of GBM
through study completion, an average of 18 months (mean follow-up time)
Changes in quality of life at month 2 and month 4 after start of TTFields treatment compared to baseline in patients who started TTFields treatment at baseline
Changes in quality of life assessed via questionnaires EORTC Quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) QLQ-C30 and BN20 after start of TTFields treatment compared to baseline in patients who started TTFields treatment at baseline is measured using the QoL questionnaires at months two and four after start of TTFields treatment
month 2 and month 4 after start of TTFields treatment compared to baseline in patients who started TTFields treatment at baseline
Patients' reason(s) for refusing TTFields at baseline
Patients' reason(s) for refusing TTFields is measured using a study specific questionnaire at baseline
baseline
Study Arms (1)
GBM with indication for TTFields
newly diagnosed GBM with clinical indication for TTFields
Interventions
Tumor treating fields (TTFields) help slow down or stop glioblastoma cancer cells from dividing by disrupting dividing mechanism of cancer cells leading to apoptosis. TTFields are low-intensity, intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields delivered continuously through adhesive patches, called transducer arrays, to the area of the brain where the GBM tumor is located. These transducer arrays are applied to the scalp and are connected to the wearable and portable device. TTFields are approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with newly diagnosed GBM with clinical indication for TTFields treatment, as indicated by the treating physician, will be included in the study, provided all inclusion and no exclusion criteria are met and written consent is given to use and process their routine clinical data according to data privacy standards.
You may qualify if:
- Newly diagnosed histologically confirmed GBM (WHO-Grade IV)
- Patient within first 3 cycles of first-line tumor-specific maintenance chemotherapy
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Clinical indication for TTFields treatment
- Given informed consent for use and processing of data
You may not qualify if:
- Present or planned pregnancy
- Significant additional neurological disease (e.g. significantly increased intracerebral pressure (ICP) with a significant midline shift of the brain)
- Active implanted medical device (e.g. deep brain stimulator)
- Documented allergy to conductive hydrogel
- Skull defect (e.g. missing bone with no replacement, bullet fragments in the skull)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NovoCure Ltd.lead
Study Sites (1)
Clinical center Aschaffenburg-Alzenau
Aschaffenburg, Bavaria, 63739, Germany
Related Publications (12)
Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009. Neuro Oncol. 2012 Nov;14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):v1-49. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos218. No abstract available.
PMID: 23095881BACKGROUNDStupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330.
PMID: 15758009BACKGROUNDStupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, Kesari S, Steinberg DM, Toms SA, Taylor LP, Lieberman F, Silvani A, Fink KL, Barnett GH, Zhu JJ, Henson JW, Engelhard HH, Chen TC, Tran DD, Sroubek J, Tran ND, Hottinger AF, Landolfi J, Desai R, Caroli M, Kew Y, Honnorat J, Idbaih A, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y, Hegi ME, Ram Z. Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Dec 15;314(23):2535-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16669.
PMID: 26670971BACKGROUNDKesari S, Ram Z; EF-14 Trial Investigators. Tumor-treating fields plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for glioblastoma at first recurrence: a post hoc analysis of the EF-14 trial. CNS Oncol. 2017 Jul;6(3):185-193. doi: 10.2217/cns-2016-0049. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
PMID: 28399638BACKGROUNDStupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V, Kirson ED, Taillibert S, Liebermann F, Dbaly V, Ram Z, Villano JL, Rainov N, Weinberg U, Schiff D, Kunschner L, Raizer J, Honnorat J, Sloan A, Malkin M, Landolfi JC, Payer F, Mehdorn M, Weil RJ, Pannullo SC, Westphal M, Smrcka M, Chin L, Kostron H, Hofer S, Bruce J, Cosgrove R, Paleologous N, Palti Y, Gutin PH. NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 18.
PMID: 22608262BACKGROUNDMrugala MM, Engelhard HH, Dinh Tran D, Kew Y, Cavaliere R, Villano JL, Annenelie Bota D, Rudnick J, Love Sumrall A, Zhu JJ, Butowski N. Clinical practice experience with NovoTTF-100A system for glioblastoma: The Patient Registry Dataset (PRiDe). Semin Oncol. 2014 Oct;41 Suppl 6:S4-S13. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PMID: 25213869BACKGROUNDKirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J, Soustiel JF, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Steinberg-Shapira S, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Wasserman Y, Salzberg M, Ryffel B, Goldsher D, Dekel E, Palti Y. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10152-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
PMID: 17551011BACKGROUNDKirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Dekel E, Itzhaki A, Wasserman Y, Schatzberger R, Palti Y. Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res. 2004 May 1;64(9):3288-95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0083.
PMID: 15126372BACKGROUNDGiladi M, Schneiderman RS, Voloshin T, Porat Y, Munster M, Blat R, Sherbo S, Bomzon Z, Urman N, Itzhaki A, Cahal S, Shteingauz A, Chaudhry A, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y. Mitotic Spindle Disruption by Alternating Electric Fields Leads to Improper Chromosome Segregation and Mitotic Catastrophe in Cancer Cells. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 11;5:18046. doi: 10.1038/srep18046.
PMID: 26658786BACKGROUNDGera N, Yang A, Holtzman TS, Lee SX, Wong ET, Swanson KD. Tumor treating fields perturb the localization of septins and cause aberrant mitotic exit. PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0125269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125269. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26010837BACKGROUNDKanner AA, Wong ET, Villano JL, Ram Z; EF-11 Investigators. Post Hoc analyses of intention-to-treat population in phase III comparison of NovoTTF-100A system versus best physician's choice chemotherapy. Semin Oncol. 2014 Oct;41 Suppl 6:S25-34. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PMID: 25213871BACKGROUNDStupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, Read W, Steinberg D, Lhermitte B, Toms S, Idbaih A, Ahluwalia MS, Fink K, Di Meco F, Lieberman F, Zhu JJ, Stragliotto G, Tran D, Brem S, Hottinger A, Kirson ED, Lavy-Shahaf G, Weinberg U, Kim CY, Paek SH, Nicholas G, Bruna J, Hirte H, Weller M, Palti Y, Hegi ME, Ram Z. Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718.
PMID: 29260225BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oliver Bähr, Prof.
Clinical center Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2017
First Posted
August 22, 2017
Study Start
August 31, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
January 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share