Switching TDF/FTC/EFV to TDF/FTC/RPV VS Continuing TDF/FTC/EFV in HIV Patients With Complete Virological Suppression
STEREOS
Switching Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine Versus Continuing Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz in HIV1-infected Patients With Complete Virological Suppression
1 other identifier
interventional
246
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
According to the Thai National Guidelines for Treatment of HIV/AIDS 2014, the recommended first line ART regimen was 2 NRTIs backbone, TDF and FTC; plus 1 NNRTI, EFV, with RPV as an alternative one. Most of the randomized-controlled studies, including ECHO and THRIVE, showed the non-inferiority of RPV compared with EFV in naive cases. But there were not much randomized-controlled trials for changing from other NRTI to RPV in patients who currently on another ART, especially in Thailand. Moreover, the concerned adverse effects of dyslipidemia and neurological symptoms were better in RPV-based than EFV-based regimen. Finally, the cost-effectiveness and universal coverage are also the benefit of RPV over EFV in term of economics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2018
CompletedMay 7, 2019
May 1, 2019
1.5 years
August 14, 2017
May 4, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sustained virological response
maintain the undetectable HIV viral load
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Lipid adverse outcome
12 months
Neurological adverse outcome
12 months
Cost -saving after switching regimens
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Switching TDF/FTC/EFV to TDF/FTC/RPV
EXPERIMENTALSwitching from Tenofovir 300 mg/day + Emtricitabine 200 mg/day + Efavirenz 600 mg/day (once daily) to Tenofovir 300 mg/day + Emtricitabine 200 mg/day + Rilpivirine 25 mg/day (once daily) Intervention: Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine
Continuing TDF/FTC/EFV
ACTIVE COMPARATORContinuing Tenofovir 300 mg/day + Emtricitabine 200 mg/day + Efavirenz 600 mg/day Intervention: Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz
Interventions
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine to compare the non-inferiority of efficacy and adverse effects to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz in patients with virological suppression
as a active comparator
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- on TDF/FTC/EFV for more than 3 months
- Blood HIV RNA viral load \<50 copies/mL
- CD4+ count \>200 cells/mm3
- eligible to sign the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- history of NRTI resistance
- on medication that potentially interact with study drug
- denied to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Thai AIDS Society. Thailand National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention 2014. Nontaburi: Bureau of AIDS, TB, and STIs, 2014.
BACKGROUNDMolina JM, Cahn P, Grinsztejn B, Lazzarin A, Mills A, Saag M, Supparatpinyo K, Walmsley S, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; ECHO study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with tenofovir and emtricitabine in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (ECHO): a phase 3 randomised double-blind active-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):238-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60936-7.
PMID: 21763936RESULTCohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, Fourie J, Johnson MA, Ruxrungtham K, Wu H, Zorrilla C, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; THRIVE study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.
PMID: 21763935RESULTThamrongwonglert P, Chetchotisakd P, Anunnatsiri S, Mootsikapun P. Improvement of lipid profiles when switching from efavirenz to rilpivirine in HIV-infected patients with dyslipidemia. HIV Clin Trials. 2016 Feb;17(1):12-6. doi: 10.1080/15284336.2015.1112480. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PMID: 26739573RESULTGianotti N, Poli A, Nozza S, Spagnuolo V, Tambussi G, Bossolasco S, Cinque P, Maillard M, Cernuschi M, Galli L, Lazzarin A, Castagna A. Efficacy and safety in clinical practice of a rilpivirine, tenofovir and emtricitabine single-tablet regimen in virologically suppressed HIV-positive patients on stable antiretroviral therapy. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Jul 30;18(1):20037. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.20037. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26232000RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sirichai Wiriyatanakorn, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Somneuk Sungkanuparp, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2017
First Posted
August 16, 2017
Study Start
October 27, 2016
Primary Completion
April 30, 2018
Study Completion
April 30, 2018
Last Updated
May 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05