Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Metastatic Breast Cancer (Qualitative Study)
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Develop a Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)-specific electronic Treatment Plans (TP). Phase 1: Aim 1a: Patient interviews along with navigator, nurse, and physician focus group discussions will be used to identify factors that influence decision-making in treatment selection and the optimal approach for sharing information about prognosis and guideline-based care. Identify decisional needs for Shared Decision Making (SDM) in MBC. Investigators will conduct semi-structured interviews/discussion groups with patients, navigators, nurses, and physicians to elements important to decision-making. Phase 2: Aim 1b: Develop MBC-specific TP. Investigators will build upon Aim1a to systematically develop the TP intervention using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Investigators will test the TPs with 5 patients and conduct qualitative investigations to refine the TP using an iterative process. Phase 3:Further explore decision-making related to reducing amount of chemotherapy for patients with good prognosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedFebruary 23, 2026
February 1, 2026
5.5 years
July 26, 2017
February 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Shared Decision Making
Shared decision making occurs when patients are informed of risks and benefits associated with treatment options and partner with their oncologist to incorporate their personal preferences and values into decision-making. Shared decision making in medicine can improve quality of care and reduce costs. This will be accessed using qualitative interviews and focus groups discussions. This is not a survey based study.
3 years
Concept of de-escalation
Patients reduce the amount of chemotherapy to avoid side effects
2 years
Study Arms (8)
Metastatic Breast Interview Participants - Shared Decision Making
Metastatic Breast Patient Participants will be interviewed on the topic of Shared Decision Making. This will be a one time, one-on-one interview with a trained interviewer.
Early Stage Breast Interview Participants - Shared Decision Making
Early Stage Breast Patient Participants will be interviewed on the topic of Shared Decision Making. This will be a one time, one-on-one interview with a trained interviewer.
Provider Focus Group -Shared Decision Making
Clinic Provider Participants will participate in a focus group on the topic of Shared Decision Making. This will be a one time, focus group interview with a trained moderator.
Non-UAB Provider Shared Decision Making
Non-UAB Provider Participants will be interviewed on the topic of Shared Decision Making. This will be a one time, one-on-one interview with a trained interviewer.
Early Stage de-escalation Interview Participants
Early Stage Breast Patient Participants will be interviewed on the topic of de-escalation of cancer treatment. This will be a one time, one-on-one interview with a trained interviewer.
Patient Advocate de-escalation Interview Participants
Patient Advocate Participants will be interviewed on the topic of de-escalation of cancer treatment. This will be a one time, one-on-one interview with a trained interviewer.
Physician de-escalation Interview Participants
Physician Participants will be interviewed on the topic of de-escalation of cancer treatment. This will be a one time, one-on-one interview with a trained interviewer.
Early Stage Feedback Interview Participants
Early Stage Breast Patient Participants will be interviewed to provide feedback on a decision making tool (video). This will be a one time, one-on-one interview with a trained interviewer.
Interventions
The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence decision-making in treatment selection and the optimal approach for sharing information about prognosis and guideline-based care. Secondly, to further understand patient perspective on the concept of de-escalation, in which patients reduce the amount of chemotherapy to avoid side effects and (2) consider how prognosis would impact their decision-making about reducing chemotherapy (as standard or care or within a clinical trial).
Eligibility Criteria
Metastatic and Early stage Breast Cancer patients receiving care at UAB Hematology/Oncology Kirklin Clinic. Breast Cancer Patient advocates, oncology nurses, navigators, and Oncology Physicians
You may qualify if:
- \. Women with age ≥ 18
- \. Presence of Metastatic Breast Cancer or Early Stage Breast Cancer
- \. Patients may be receiving any line and type of therapy including both standard of care and clinical trials.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Patient who are not able to read and/or speak English
- \. Patients with a life expectancy less than 3 months
- \. Patients unable to provide informed consent
- \. Men
- Patient Advocates (Phase III)
- \. Providers who are self-identified patient advocates working with breast cancer researchers
- None
- Sampling: We will conduct interviews with 10-20 patient advocates for phase 3 of this project.
- Provider (navigator, nurse, physician) (Pjhase I, III)
- Providers who have direct contact with breast cancer patients
- \. None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- American Cancer Society, Inc.collaborator
- University of Alabama at Birminghamlead
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249, United States
Related Publications (1)
Rocque GB, Andrews C, Lawhon VM, Ingram SA, Frazier RM, Smith ML, Wagner LI, Zubkoff L, Wallner LP, Wolff AC. Physician Perspectives on Reducing Curative Cancer Treatment Intensity for Populations Underrepresented in Clinical Trials. Oncologist. 2022 Dec 9;27(12):1067-1073. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac191.
PMID: 36215065DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gabrielle B Rocque, MD
Assistant Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2017
First Posted
August 14, 2017
Study Start
June 27, 2017
Primary Completion
December 20, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
February 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share