Translation of District Sun Safe Policies to Schools
SSS
1 other identifier
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the Translation of District Sun Safe Policies to Schools study was to test whether schools need assistance to facilitate the implementation of school district board-approved sun safety policies by individual elementary schools. The intervention is expected to produce a change in practices at the school level and to improve the sun safety behavior of children attending the intervention schools compared to control schools. A group of 40 school districts in Southern California that adopted board policy 5141.7 for sun safety provided 118 schools that were randomized to a intervention condition or to an attention control condition. The primary outcome is change in school-level sun safety practices based on 10 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) categories for policy change (i.e., sunscreen use, UV protective clothing, hats, student education, teacher education, provision of shade, scheduling to avoid peak UV exposure, parent outreach, resource allocation for sun safety, and an accountability system). This primary outcome was assessed by a survey of the principal and one teacher at each school (N=118 principals and 113 teachers at pretest). Parents (N=1770 at pretest) of children attending the schools completed a self-report measure assessing the secondary outcomes of change in individual-level sun safety behavior of their elementary school aged children and number of communications received from the school regarding sun safety. Assessment of principals, teachers and parents occurred at pretest, just prior to randomization, and at a posttest 20-months after the pretest. One Parent Teacher Association (PTA) representative per school was contacted to assess PTA involvement in intervention activities related to sun safety. The primary hypothesis was stated for the effectiveness of the intervention condition at increasing school-level sun safety practices consistent with the sun safety policies of the school districts and read, H1: At follow-up, a greater percentage of schools in the intervention condition will implement at least one component of the school district sun safety policy compared to schools randomized to the attention-control condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2018
CompletedJuly 20, 2018
July 1, 2018
4.2 years
August 6, 2017
July 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measure of implementation of sun safety practices and policy at schools
Change in implementation of sun safety policy after intervention, through survey administration
20 Months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Students sun protection behavior
20 Months
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALAll participants in the Translation of District Sun Safe Policies to Schools arm received 1) initial coaching meeting that guided principals through an evaluation of current sun safety practices, the selection of goals for the implementation of sun safety practices, and guidance on the use of intervention materials to support implementation of sun safety practices in the school, 2) follow-up communications from coaches including email, telephone, and virtual meetings, 3) access to media and online resources to support implementation of sun safety practices, 4) mini-grants to support changes in school sun safety practices.
Attention Control
OTHERAll participants in the attention control arm received three emails during the 20 month intervention period including (1) NASBE's Fit Healthy and Ready to Learn; A School Health Guide Part II: Policies to Promote Sun Safety and Prevent Skin Cancer, (2) CDC's Guidelines for Sun Safety to Prevent Skin Cancer, and (3) a link to the Surgeon General's 2014 Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer. This attention-control treatment will equalize schools on awareness of recommendations to implement school sun safety.
Interventions
Translation of District Sun Safe Policies to Schools intervention was guided by Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Principals and other staff in intervention schools received 1) initial coaching meeting that guided principals through an evaluation of current sun safety practices, the selection of goals for the implementation of sun safety practices, and guidance on the use of intervention materials to support implementation of sun safety practices in the school, 2) follow-up communications from coaches including email, telephone, and virtual meetings, 3) access to media and online resources to support implementation of sun safety practices, 4) mini-grants to support changes in school sun safety practices. These components promoted implementation of the 10 policy components recommended by CDC.
Schools in the control condition received three emails during the 20 month intervention period including (1) NASBE's Fit Healthy and Ready to Learn; A School Health Guide Part II: Policies to Promote Sun Safety and Prevent Skin Cancer, (2) CDC's Guidelines for Sun Safety to Prevent Skin Cancer, and (3) a link to the Surgeon General's 2014 Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer. This attention-control treatment will equalize schools on awareness of recommendations to implement school sun safety.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- School districts in California with school Board Policy 5141.7 available online, and with at least one elementary school.
You may not qualify if:
- Schools Districts that do not have school Board Policy 5141.7 online, or do not have any elementary schools
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Claremont Graduate University
Claremont, California, 91711, United States
Related Publications (1)
Reynolds KD, Buller DB, Buller MK, Massie K, Berteletti J, Ashley J, Meenan R. Randomized controlled trial evaluating an intervention supporting implementation of sun safety policies in California public elementary schools. Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106125. Epub 2020 May 7.
PMID: 32389679DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kim D Reynolds, PhD
Claremont Graduate University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2017
First Posted
August 9, 2017
Study Start
January 13, 2014
Primary Completion
March 21, 2018
Study Completion
April 10, 2018
Last Updated
July 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share