Sun Safe Workplaces: A Campaign on Sun Protection Policies for Outdoor Workers Phase I
SSW
2 other identifiers
interventional
825
1 country
3
Brief Summary
A sample of local government organizations are recruited to a group-randomized pretest-posttest controlled trial evaluating the effect of a campaign to promote workplace policy and education on sun protection for outdoor workers. Primary outcome is adoption of formal policies and secondary outcomes are implementation of policy and sun protection practices by outdoor workers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 18, 2026
CompletedAugust 18, 2026
July 1, 2026
5.8 years
June 29, 2016
November 3, 2021
July 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence of a Sun Protection Policy for Outdoor Workers Score at 2-Year Follow-up
Project staff coded written workplace policy documents on the presence of 15 "content categories" in three domains: 1) environmental controls; 2) administrative procedures; and 3) personal protection practices. Presence of policy was defined as having one or more policy components present in the written workplace policy documents (value=1) versus no content components present (value=0). Total policy score was calculated by summing the number of policy components in the written documents (range = 0-15). Higher values indicate more comprehensive sun protection policy.
2 year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Extent of Sun Protection Policy for Outdoor Workers at Posttest
From baseline to 2-year follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Sun Safe Workplaces Program
EXPERIMENTALProgram promoting the adoption of occupational sun protection policies by the local government organization comprised of personal visits with senior managers and in-person training of outdoor workers by research staff over two years.
Attention Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORProgram promoting occupational sun protection practices by employees in local government organizations through two mailings containing educational materials and presentations at state professional meetings by project staff.
Interventions
The intervention began by sending a Program Announcement Packet and requesting the first face-to-face meeting. At the first meeting, intervention staff covered: 1) Introduction to SSW; 2) Sun Safety Practices in the Workplace; 3) Sun Safety Policy for Outdoor Workers; 4) Sun Safety Policy Adoption; 5) Sun Safety Policy Reinforcement and Maintenance. They presented the SSW Website and a Sun Safety Tool Box. Following the first meeting, the manager scheduled Sun Safety Training by intervention staff with various employee groups. Workplace Sun Safety Materials were sent in four sets (twice a year over two years) for distribution to employees. Research staff made monthly Follow-up Contacts with managers.
Research staff sent printed materials on occupational sun safety to local government organizations twice. These included posters with personal protection messages and skin cancer rates, risk assessment brochures, worksite guides, total skin self-examination CD-Rom, the American Academy of Dermatology SPOT bookmark, and a sun safety tip card from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Staff made presentations on general sun safety topics (not policy) at state professional conferences.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A local government organization with employees who worked outdoors in at least one of the following service areas: public works, public safety, and parks and recreation,
- Having a full time executive,
- Having a population of at least 3000 residents,
- Being employed at a participating local government organization as a manager
- Being employed at a participating local government organization in a job requiring outdoor work at least part of the time.
You may not qualify if:
- Organization had participated in the authors' previous occupational sun protection project.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Klein Buendel, Inc.lead
- University of Colorado, Denvercollaborator
- Kaiser Foundation Research Institutecollaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
Oakland, California, 94612-3466, United States
University of Colorado Denver
Aurora, Colorado, 80045-0508, United States
Klein Buendel, Inc.
Golden, Colorado, 80403, United States
Related Publications (2)
Walkosz BJ, Buller DB, Andersen PA, Wallis A, Buller MK, Scott MD. Factors Associated With Occupational Sun-Protection Policies in Local Government Organizations in Colorado. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Sep;151(9):991-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0575.
PMID: 25993051BACKGROUNDWallis A, Andersen PA, Buller DB, Walkosz B, Lui L, Buller M, Scott MD, Jenkins R. Adoption of sun safe workplace practices by local governments. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):608-16. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000026.
PMID: 24231670BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The trial was conducted in a state that may have increased relevance of sun safety. Local government organizations do not have a profit motive and may place a premium on employee benefits. Actions taken to implement policies were self-reported by managers, which is open to demand and social desirability biases, but policy scores were based on objective coding of written documents. Failure of some organizations to provide copies of documents at posttest may have caused us to miss policy change.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Buller
- Organization
- Klein Buendel, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David B Buller, PhD
Klein Buendel, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2016
First Posted
July 6, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 30, 2015
Study Completion
December 31, 2015
Last Updated
August 18, 2026
Results First Posted
August 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share