NCT03242057

Brief Summary

Extubation failure is a significant problem in preterm neonates and prolonged intubation is a well-documented risk factor for development of chronic lung disease. Out of the respiratory modalities available to extubate a preterm neonate; high flow nasal canula, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are the most commonly used. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis concluded that NIPPV has lower extubation failure as compared to nCPAP (30% vs. 40%) NAVA (neurally adjusted ventilatory assist), a relatively new mode of mechanical ventilation in which the diaphragmatic electrical activity initiates a ventilator breath and adjustment of a preset gain (NAVA level) determines the peak inspiratory pressure. It has been reported to improve patient - ventilator synchrony and minimize mean airway pressure and ability to wean an infant from a ventilator. However till date there has been no head to head comparison of extubation failure in infants managed on NAVA with conventional ventilator strategies. In this study the investigators aim to compare primary extubation failure rates in infants/participants managed by NIPPV vs. NI-NAVA (non invasive NAVA). Eligible infants/participants will be randomized to be extubated to predefined NIPPV or NI-NAVA ventilator settings and will be assessed for primary extubation failure (defined as reintubation within 5 days after an elective extubation).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2017

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 8, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 23, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 5, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 5, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

July 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

NAVAExtubationNIPPV

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Extubation success

    assess how many infants stayed extubated at 5 days after extubation

    5 days

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)

    until discharge / 36 weeks post menstrual age

  • Ventilator Days

    until discharge / 36 weeks post menstrual age

  • NICU length of stay

    until discharge / 36 weeks post menstrual age

  • Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)

    until discharge / 36 weeks post menstrual age

  • Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC

    until discharge / 36 weeks post menstrual age

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

NI-NAVA

EXPERIMENTAL

* Wait to meet extubation criteria within 14 days postnatal age * Pre-extubation mode of invasive ventilation will be per physician discretion (NAVA, CMV, high frequency oscillator ventilation (HFOV) or high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV)) Pi to determine eligibility or exclusion * Randomize to either NIPPV or NI-NAVA, 1:1 randomization * PI will not be blinded to the intervention (not feasible) * If extubating to NAVA then place the catheter to optimize position and Edi 1 hr. prior to planned extubation. * ABG or CBG to be obtained at 4 hrs. post extubation * NI-NAVA settings will be weaned or increased as the clinical situation demands and outlined in the protocol

Other: NAVA

NIPPV

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Wait to meet extubation criteria within 14 days postnatal age * Pre-extubation mode of invasive ventilation will be per physician discretion (NAVA, CMV, high frequency oscillator ventilation (HFOV) or high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV)) PI to determine eligibility or exclusion * Randomize to either NIPPV or NI-NAVA, 1:1 randomization * PI will not be blinded to the intervention (not feasible) * ABG or CBG to be obtained at 4 hrs. post extubation * NIPPV settings will be weaned or increased as the clinical situation demands and outlined in the protocol

Other: NIPPV

Interventions

NAVAOTHER

Infant will be extubated to NAVA, settings based per protocol

NI-NAVA
NIPPVOTHER

Infant will be extubated to NIPPV, settings detailed in protocol

NIPPV

Eligibility Criteria

Age24 Weeks - 32 Weeks
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Infants born between 24 weeks and ≤ 32 weeks completed gestational age or birth weight less than or equal to 1500 grams
  • Postnatal age ≤ 14 days
  • Inborn
  • Mechanically ventilated for at least 12 hrs.
  • Intubated within first 24 hrs. after birth
  • Outborn infants intubated and transferred to UF within 24 hrs. after birth.

You may not qualify if:

  • Outborn \> 24hrs of age.
  • Failed elective extubation prior to study enrollment
  • Major congenital anomalies or known/suspected chromosomal anomalies
  • Use of paralytics in previous 24 hrs.
  • Participation in another randomized interventional trial
  • Known or suspected phrenic nerve palsy or lesion
  • Known or suspected diaphragmatic lesion
  • Any contraindication to have a nasogastric or orogastric tube placement

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Firestone KS, Beck J, Stein H. Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist for Noninvasive Support in Neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2016 Dec;43(4):707-724. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2016.07.007.

    PMID: 27837754BACKGROUND
  • LoVerde B, Firestone KS, Stein HM. Comparing changing neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) levels in intubated and recently extubated neonates. J Perinatol. 2016 Dec;36(12):1097-1100. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.152. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

    PMID: 27629375BACKGROUND
  • Firestone KS, Fisher S, Reddy S, White DB, Stein HM. Effect of changing NAVA levels on peak inspiratory pressures and electrical activity of the diaphragm in premature neonates. J Perinatol. 2015 Aug;35(8):612-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.14. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

    PMID: 25764328BACKGROUND
  • Stein H, Firestone K. Application of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Feb;19(1):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

    PMID: 24238745BACKGROUND
  • Stein H, Firestone K, Rimensberger PC. Synchronized mechanical ventilation using electrical activity of the diaphragm in neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2012 Sep;39(3):525-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.06.004.

    PMID: 22954267BACKGROUND
  • Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3.

    PMID: 28146296BACKGROUND
  • Lee J, Kim HS, Jung YH, Shin SH, Choi CW, Kim EK, Kim BI, Choi JH. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants: a randomised phase II crossover trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Nov;100(6):F507-13. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308057. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

    PMID: 26178463BACKGROUND
  • Baudin F, Pouyau R, Cour-Andlauer F, Berthiller J, Robert D, Javouhey E. Neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) reduces asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for severe bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Dec;50(12):1320-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23139. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

    PMID: 25488197BACKGROUND
  • Bhandari V. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the newborn: review of literature and evidence-based guidelines. J Perinatol. 2010 Aug;30(8):505-12. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.165. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

    PMID: 19847188BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature BirthBronchopulmonary DysplasiaBarotrauma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryLung InjuryLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Sanket Shah, MD

    University of Florida

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
provider and PI is masked for randomization but then no masking once treatment (mode of ventilation) is applied
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2017

First Posted

August 8, 2017

Study Start

October 23, 2017

Primary Completion

September 5, 2019

Study Completion

September 5, 2019

Last Updated

February 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations