Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 301 in Migraine Prevention
A Phase 2a Randomized Double-blind Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 301 in Migraine Prevention
2 other identifiers
interventional
343
8 countries
49
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effect of AMG 301 compared to placebo on the change from the baseline period in monthly migraine days in subjects with migraine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
49 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 4, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 7, 2020
CompletedFebruary 7, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.1 years
August 1, 2017
January 24, 2020
January 24, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days to the Last 4 Weeks of the 12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period
A migraine day is any calendar day from the eDiary in which the participant experienced a migraine headache. A migraine headache is a headache with or without aura, lasting for \>= 4 hours, and meeting \>=1 of the criteria: 1. \>= 2 pain features (unilateral, throbbing, moderate to severe, exacerbated with exercise/physical activity) 2. \>= 1 symptoms (nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia) If the participant took a migraine-specific medication during aura or to treat headache, it was counted as a migraine day. Days without eDiary data in each monthly interval are handled by proration. Negative change from baseline values indicated improvement (i.e. fewer migraine days after treatment as compared to baseline).
Baseline Day -28 to Day -1; Weeks 9-12
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Percentage of Participants Who Responded, Defined as At Least a 50% Reduction From the Baseline Period in Monthly Migraine Days in the Last 4 Weeks of the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period
Baseline Day -28 to Day -1; Weeks 9-12
Change From Baseline Period in Monthly Acute Migraine-Specific Medication Days in the Last 4 Weeks of the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period
Baseline Day -28 to Day -1; Weeks 9-12
Change From Baseline in Mean Physical Impairment Domain Scores as Measured by the Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary (MPFID) Over the Last 4 Weeks of the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period
Baseline Day -28 to Day -1; Weeks 9-12
Change From Baseline in Mean Impact on Everyday Activity Domain Scores as Measured by the Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary (MPFID) Over the Last 4 Weeks of the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period
Baseline Day -28 to Day -1; Weeks 9-12
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Day 1 up to Week 30 (12 weeks of double-blind treatment plus 18 weeks follow-up after last dose of investigational product)
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants randomized to Placebo were administered 6 subcutaneous (SC) injections on day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 during the 12 week double-blind treatment period.
AMG 301 210 mg Q4W
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to AMG 301 210 mg every fourth week (Q4W) received a total of 3 AMG 301 subcutaneous (SC) injections (70 mg/mL in each injection) plus 3 matching placebo injections on day 1 and weeks 4 and 8. Participants also received 6 SC placebo injections on weeks 2, 6, and 10 during the 12 week double-blind treatment period.
AMG 301 420 mg Q2W
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to AMG 301 420 mg every second week (Q2W) received a total of 6 AMG 301 subcutaneous (SC) injections (70 mg/mL in each injection) on day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 during the 12 week double-blind treatment period.
Interventions
Placebo was presented in identical containers, stored/packaged the same as AMG 301. All injections were administered within 30 minutes on treatment days.
AMG 301 was packaged in 5 mL clear glass vials containing 1 mL of 70 mg/mL of AMG 301. All injections were administered within 30 minutes on treatment days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults ≥ 18 to ≤ 60 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form.
- History of migraine (with or without aura) for ≥ 12 months before screening according to the International Headache Society (IHS) Classification ICHD-III (Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, 2013)
- Migraine frequency: ≥ 4 migraine days per month on average across the 3 months before screening.
- Failed at least 1 medication for prophylactic treatment of migraine due to tolerability or lack of efficacy
You may not qualify if:
- Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset.
- History of cluster headache, hemiplegic migraine headache.
- Unable to differentiate migraine from other headaches.
- Migraine with continuous pain, in which the subject does not experience any pain-free periods (of any duration) during the 1 month before the screening period.
- History or evidence of any other clinically significant disorder, condition or disease that, in the opinion of the investigator or Amgen physician, if consulted, would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (49)
Research Site
Long Beach, California, 90806, United States
Research Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Research Site
Boulder, Colorado, 80301, United States
Research Site
East Hartford, Connecticut, 06118, United States
Research Site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905, United States
Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32801, United States
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407, United States
Research Site
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States
Research Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104, United States
Research Site
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63303, United States
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Research Site
Plainview, New York, 11803, United States
Research Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405, United States
Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Research Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75214, United States
Research Site
Round Rock, Texas, 78681, United States
Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109, United States
Research Site
Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
Research Site
Klagenfurt, 9020, Austria
Research Site
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Research Site
Calgary, Alberta, T3M 1M4, Canada
Research Site
Surrey, British Columbia, V3Z 2N6, Canada
Research Site
Markham, Ontario, L3R 9X3, Canada
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4S 1Y2, Canada
Research Site
Lévis, Quebec, G6W 0M6, Canada
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1V1, Canada
Research Site
Brno, 616 00, Czechia
Research Site
Prague, 120 00, Czechia
Research Site
Prague, 140 59, Czechia
Research Site
Přerov, 750 02, Czechia
Research Site
Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Research Site
Glostrup Municipality, 2600, Denmark
Research Site
Viborg, 8800, Denmark
Research Site
Helsinki, 00100, Finland
Research Site
Helsinki, 00930, Finland
Research Site
Jyväskylä, 40100, Finland
Research Site
Oulu, 90220, Finland
Research Site
Turku, 20100, Finland
Research Site
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Research Site
Berlin, 10435, Germany
Research Site
Hamburg, 20251, Germany
Research Site
Kiel, 24149, Germany
Research Site
Leipzig, 04107, Germany
Research Site
Stockholm, 112 45, Sweden
Research Site
Stockholm, 114 33, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Ashina M, Dolezil D, Bonner JH, Zhou L, Klatt J, Picard H, Mikol DD. A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of AMG 301, a pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide PAC1 receptor monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention. Cephalalgia. 2021 Jan;41(1):33-44. doi: 10.1177/0333102420970889. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
PMID: 33231489DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2017
First Posted
August 3, 2017
Study Start
September 6, 2017
Primary Completion
October 16, 2018
Study Completion
February 4, 2019
Last Updated
February 7, 2020
Results First Posted
February 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request