Comparison Between Ultra Sound Guided Rectus Sheath Block and Field Block for Midline Hernia Repair
Ultra Sound Guided Rectus Sheath Block or Field Block for Midline Hernia Repair: A Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Randomized double blinded controlled clinical trial will be done with a total number of 75 patients will be divided into 3 groups. To compare between Ultra-sound guided rectus sheath block VS Field block infiltration in providing a good analgesia for patients undergoing midline hernia repair to detect which one is superior.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 11, 2019
CompletedMarch 9, 2021
March 1, 2021
5 months
June 10, 2017
January 24, 2019
March 6, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Immediate Postoperative Pain
Evaluation of the intensity of postoperative pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain: 0- 10 Scale; 0 the lowest pain score, 10 the highest pain scale. 0 score: Better pain control achieved. 10 score: Worst pain control achieved. 3 score: Controllable pain control achieved.
evaluation of postoperative pain in patients immediately after the procedure.
Postoperative Pain at 2 Hours After Procedure.
Evaluation of the intensity of postoperative pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain: 0- 10 Scale; 0 the lowest pain score, 10 the highest pain scale. 0 score: Better pain control achieved. 10 score: Worst pain control achieved. 3 score: Controllable pain control achieved.
evaluation of postoperative pain in patients at 2 hours after procedure.
Postoperative Pain at 6 Hours After Procedure.
Evaluation of the intensity of postoperative pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain: 0- 10 Scale; 0 the lowest pain score, 10 the highest pain scale. 0 score: Better pain control achieved. 10 score: Worst pain control achieved. 3 score: Controllable pain control achieved.
Evaluation of postoperative pain in patients at 6 hours after procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in the Level of Serum Cortisol.
Measurement of serum cortisol level (nmol/ liter) using the ELISA technique after 1 hour of the start of the surgery.
Measurement of Serum Adrenaline Levels (ng/ml) Using ELISA Technique.
1 hour after the start of the surgery using ELISA technique.
Measurement of Serum Noradrenaline Levels (ng/ml) Using ELISA Technique.
1 hour after the start of the surgery
Measurement of Serum Cortisol Level (Nmol/ Liter) Using ELISA Technique.
30 minutes before the start of the surgery
Measurement of Serum Adrenaline Level (ng/ml) Using ELISA Technique.
30 minutes before the start of the surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORnormal saline will be injected in the rectus sheath
Rectus block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORbupivicaine will be injected in the rectus sheath
Field block group
EXPERIMENTALbupivicaine will be injected locally in a circular fashion surrounding the site of the hernia
Interventions
ultra sound guided injection into the rectus sheath
injected into rectus sheath using ultrasound \& locally surrounding the hernia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective midline hernia repair surgery.
- Age: adult patients between 18 - 60 years old.
- Gender: Both male and female.
- ASA Class: I \& II.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of patient.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Fever or sepsis.
- Patients ASA III or IV.
- Addicts and drug abusers.
- Patients taking corticosteroids or any cardio - active drugs.
- Local infection at site of the injection.
- Allergy to any of the study medications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Theodor Bilharz Research Institute
Giza, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Muhammed Hussein
- Organization
- Theodor Bilharz Research Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
mohammed ma hussein, lecturer
Theodor Bilharz Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesia and Surgical intensive care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2017
First Posted
July 21, 2017
Study Start
August 10, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2017
Study Completion
December 30, 2017
Last Updated
March 9, 2021
Results First Posted
July 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2021-03