A Retrospective Analysis of Spinal Anaesthesia for TURBT Procedures in Elderly Patients
1 other identifier
observational
2,800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of spinal anesthesia among elderly patients The basic methods for diagnosis and management of bladder cancer include endoscopic procedures (cystoscopy, trans-urethral resection of bladder tumour TURBT). The age of most patients is above 60, which increases the risk of complications during the perioperative period. Usually the leading anaesthesia method in TURBT procedures is regional, mainly spinal, anaesthesia. Although the prevalence of regional upon general anaesthesia is questioned, certain positive aspects of regional anaesthesia are indisputable. Maintaining logical communication with a patient during the procedure enables early diagnosis of complications (TUR syndrome, bladder perforation). Undeniably, regional anaesthesia ensures the best pain management in the early post-operative period. The simplicity of performing an efficacious spinal block and its cost-effectiveness are additional factors, which have contributed to the acknowledgement of the method as the standard of anaesthesia for transurethral procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedJuly 19, 2017
July 1, 2017
6 months
July 13, 2017
July 14, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The effectiveness of spinal anaesthesia for TURBT evaluated by a number of participants that had the procedure done, without the need of conversion to general anaesthesia .
The investigator evaluates whether the procedure could be completely performed under spinal anesthesia
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The influence of the bupivacaine spinal dose on bradycardia evaluated by a heart rate measurements
6 months
The influence of the bupivacaine dose on hypotension evaluated by the non-invasive blood pressure measurements
6 months
Experienced and non-experienced anesthetist does it influence the bupivacaine dose
6 months
Experienced and non-experienced anesthetist does it influence the spinal anaesthesia success
6 months
Eligibility Criteria
patients that have TURBT procedure under spinal anaesthesia in the Urology Departament (Medical University of Warsaw) 2007-2017
You may qualify if:
- TURBT procedure
- spinal anaesthesia
- age over 60
You may not qualify if:
- general anaesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
I Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, 02-005, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD. PhD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2017
First Posted
July 19, 2017
Study Start
July 6, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
July 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07