Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Spinal Block Criteria During Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
observational
300
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The current study aimed at studying the effect of DM during pregnancy on the spinal block criteria during C.S. The primary end point of the trial is the incidence of complete failure of spinal block. Secondary endpoint is to determine the effect of DM on the other spinal block criteria as onset and duration of block, level of spinal block, rate of regression, hemodynamic changes, doses of inotropes and incidence of complications
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2018
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 22, 2018
February 1, 2018
2 years
February 11, 2018
February 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the incidence of complete failure of spinal block.
effect of DM during pregnancy on the spinal block criteria during C.S the incidence of complete failure of spinal block.
two years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
determine the effect of DM on the other spinal block criteria
two years
Study Arms (2)
control group.
Parturients aged 18 or older (American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status II-III parturients ASA II-III) undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, singleton pregnancy, full term, elective
study group
The same as control group but with DM or gestational diabetes Parturients aged 18 or older (American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status II-III parturients ASA II-III) undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, singleton pregnancy, full term, elective
Interventions
Intrathecal block under strict aseptic conditions will be performed by median approach (L3-4 or L4-5) under sitting position by anesthesiologists . 25 Gauge sprotte spinal needles and 2-3 mLof 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
Parturients aged 18 or older (American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status II-III parturients ASA II-III) undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, singleton pregnancy, full term, elective.
You may qualify if:
- Parturients aged 18 or older (American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status II-III parturients ASA II-III) undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, singleton pregnancy, full term, elective.
- The same as control group but with DM or gestational diabetes.
You may not qualify if:
- Parturients taller than 180 cm or shorter than 150 cm.
- Body mass index \> 45 kg/m2.
- Known anatomical anomaly such as scolyosis or kyphosis.
- Refusal of spinal anesthesia.
- Contraindications to spinal anaesthesia (allergy to local anaesthetic or a bleeding diathesis or infection at the site of injection).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Levy JH, Islas JA, Ghia JN, Turnbull C. A retrospective study of the incidence and causes of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital. Anesth Analg. 1985 Jul;64(7):705-10.
PMID: 4014732BACKGROUNDSteiner LA, Hauenstein L, Ruppen W, Hampl KF, Seeberger MD. Bupivacaine concentrations in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid in patients with failed spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):839-44. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep050. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
PMID: 19329469BACKGROUNDJovanovic L, Peterson CM. The clinical utility of glycosylated hemoglobin. Am J Med. 1981 Feb;70(2):331-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90770-1.
PMID: 6781340BACKGROUNDHillier TA, Vesco KK, Pedula KL, Beil TL, Whitlock EP, Pettitt DJ. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):766-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00009.
PMID: 18490689BACKGROUNDJovanovic L, Pettitt DJ. Gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001 Nov 28;286(20):2516-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.20.2516. No abstract available.
PMID: 11722247BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2018
First Posted
February 22, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 22, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share