Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group C ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
20 patients were selected requiring implant placement and divided randomly into two groups (10 in each group)
- for the study group, starter drill is used to locate the point of insertion as planned then pilot drill is also used to the full desired working length after that all other sequential drills are used at a low speed (50-70 rpm) without irrigation .
- In the study group: implant will be inserted in the low speed osteotomy site.
- In the control group: implants will be inserted in the conventional prepared osteotomy site.
- For both groups there is no surgical guide used.
- The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
- The flap will then be closed using interrupted 4/0 resorbable sutures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 18, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.1 years
July 15, 2017
July 15, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
crestal bone loss
measurement from radiographic analysis using digital periapical x-ray
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
patient morbidity after procedure
1 day
Implant stability value
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Biologic drilling drilling at low speed
EXPERIMENTALProcedure/Surgery: Drilling at low speed
conventional drilling drilling at convention
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure/Surgery: Drilling at conventional or high speed
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients restoring missing maxillary teeth with implant placement.
- Both sexes.
- Age: 25-45
- Mesio-distal dimensions: Not less than 6 mm
- Bone Height: Not less than 12 mm
- Bucco-lingual dimensions: Not less than 8mm
- All measures will be assessed using CBCT.
You may not qualify if:
- Sites needing bone grafting or augmentation.
- Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
- Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2017
First Posted
July 18, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share