Spinal Prilocaine for Caesarian Sections
A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Comparison of 7,5 mg Hyperbaric Bupivacaine With 2,5mcg Sufentanyl or 50 mg Hyperbaric Prilocaine With 2,5 mcg Sufentanyl for Caesarean Sections
1 other identifier
interventional
182
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Prilocaine theoretically could provide faster onset because of its lower pKa (7,7) compared to bupivacaine (8,1). The primary objective of this prospective double blind randomized trial is to determine block onset of spinal hyperbaric prilocaine compared to bupivacaine, both with a small dose of sufentanyl as an additive.The primary hypothesis is that a significant larger amount of patients will gain surgical readiness within 8 minutes after spinal injection of prilocaine with sufentanyl compared to bupivacaine with sufentanyl. Surgical readiness is defined as a sensory block level of T5 tested by loss of cold sensation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedAugust 5, 2022
August 1, 2022
4.8 years
July 13, 2017
August 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
onset time surgical readiness
amount of minutes from spinal injection (T0) to loss of cold sensation on the fifth thoracic dermatome
from start spinal anaesthesia to start of surgery (up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
regression interval of the motor block
up to 3 hours
occurrence of hypotension
from spinal injection(T0) to motor block regression ( up to 3 hours)
sensory block level
Up to 3 hours
discharge time maternity ward
Up to 3 hours
First Breast feed
up to 6 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group M
ACTIVE COMPARATORcombined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 7,5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0,5% (Marcaine H) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl ( 5 mcg/ml)( Janssens -cilag) +1 ml nacl0,9%
Group P
ACTIVE COMPARATORA combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 50 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (Tachipri, Nordic Pharma) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl (5 mcg/ml) (Janssens-cilag)
Interventions
To give surgical anesthesia for performance of the caesarian section a combined spinal epidural anesthesia will be performed with different spinal solutions according to the appointed study group
A combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 50 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (Tachipri, Nordic Pharma) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl (5 mcg/ml) (Janssens-cilag)
combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 7,5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0,5% (Marcaine H) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl ( 5 mcg/ml)( Janssens -cilag) +1 ml nacl0,9%
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A term Pregnant women (37-42 weeks)scheduled for caesarian section
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Twin or multiple pregnancy
- Preeclampsia
- Contraindication neuraxial technique
- Indication general anaesthesia
- BMI before pregnancy \>35
- Maternal height \<155 cm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Antwerplead
- AZ Klinacollaborator
- AZ Middelheimcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
AZ Middelheim
Berchem, Antwerpen, 2020, Belgium
AZ KLina
Brasschaat, Antwerp, Belgium
University Hospital Antwerp
Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The spinal solution will be prepared by an independent anaesthetist, anaesthetist trainee or research nurse on a sterile table after opening the sealed envelope with the appointed study group. The patient, the anaesthetist performing the CSE and the observer are not aware of the local anaesthetic solution administered.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2017
First Posted
July 17, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08