Pupil Dilation and Analgesia Nociception Index
Do Pupil Dilation and Analgesia Nociception Index Reflect Pain: a Pilot Study in Healthy, Conscious Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain assessment is crucial in clinical practice. Currently, subjective self-report is considered the most appropriate method to evaluate pain. Although several methods to assess pain objectively exist, the lack of a golden standard still remains. This pilot study assesses the changes in pupil dilation (PD) and the analgesia nociception index (ANI) as a measure of pain in healthy, conscious, male volunteers in a highly standardized and individualized environment. Nineteen subjects received three blocks of 4 individualized electrical stimulus intensities, ranging from no to severe pain. Subjects reported their perceived severity of each individual stimulus, enabling the comparison of changes in PD and ANI in relation to both administered stimulus intensities and perceived pain severities. PD and ANI were measured before and after each administration of a stimulus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2017
CompletedSeptember 13, 2017
September 1, 2017
3 months
September 5, 2017
September 12, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pupil dilation in relation to pain
measurement of pupil dilation
2sec before until 4sec after each painful stimulus
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Analgesia nociception index in relation to pain
30sec before until 60sec after each painful stimulus
Study Arms (1)
Experiment
EXPERIMENTAL* Individualized painful electrical stimuli, Surpass LT stimulator (EMS Biomedical, Korneuburg, Austria) with a bipolar felt pad electrode * Measurement of pupil diameter, Algiscan® (iDMed, Marseille, France) * Measurement of Analgesia Nociception Index, PhysioDoloris® (MetroDoloris, Lille, France)
Interventions
painful electrical stimuli of various intensities were administered to the subjects after which changes in pupil diameter and analgesia nociception index were measured
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- good health
- no acute or chronic pain conditions
- well rested
You may not qualify if:
- chronic treatment
- bad health
- daily use of analgetics or other medication
- weekly tobacco use
- weekly use of recreational drugs
- more than 10 alcohol consumptions a week
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UZ Brussel
Jette, 1090, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81. No abstract available.
PMID: 8737210BACKGROUNDChapman CR, Oka S, Bradshaw DH, Jacobson RC, Donaldson GW. Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in normal volunteers: relationship to brain evoked potentials and pain report. Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):44-52. doi: 10.1017/s0048577299970373.
PMID: 10098379BACKGROUNDKoenig J, Jarczok MN, Ellis RJ, Hillecke TK, Thayer JF. Heart rate variability and experimentally induced pain in healthy adults: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2014 Mar;18(3):301-14. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00379.x. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
PMID: 23922336BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wendy Van Bogaert, MS
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- STUDY CHAIR
Reginald Deschepper, PhD
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2017
First Posted
September 12, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 31, 2017
Study Completion
May 31, 2017
Last Updated
September 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09