Cognitive Behavioural Therapy- Social Functioning In Adolescence With Recent Onset Schizophrenia
Social
1 other identifier
interventional
98
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Rationale: There is growing consensus that targeting negative symptoms such as social withdrawal is essential to be able to preserve social participation, thereby reducing the high yearly costs of schizophrenia. Aaron T. Beck, founder of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), and colleagues have developed and investigated a new CBT approach, in which they target inactivity in a chronic schizophrenia population with severe negative symptoms The therapy is based on accumulating evidence that dysfunctional beliefs in conjunction with neurocognitive impairments can impede social functioning. These results suggest that CBT can be highly successful in establishing clinically meaningful improvements. However, the therapy has not yet been investigated in a recent-onset population. Objective: To evaluate the applicability and (cost-) effectiveness of a shortened, partly group based, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy focussing on social activation (CBTsa) in patients with recent onset schizophrenia. Hypotheses: 1) the investigators hypothesized that CBT focused on social activation (CBTsa) in a recent-onset population will result in a substantial reduction in severity of negative symptoms, in particular social withdrawal. 2\) The investigators expected that CBTsa would lead to an improvement in terms of Quality of Life and overall functioning. 3\) The investigators expected this intervention to result in a reduction in need for care and QALY gain as a consequence of improvement in symptoms and social functioning. Study design: Single blind randomized controlled trial with 6 month-follow up. Study population: Patients between 18 and 35 years old with negative symptoms of at least moderate severity, and who have been recently (\< 2yrs) diagnosed with schizophrenia. Intervention (if applicable): Individual and group-based CBT intervention targeting social withdrawal. Main study parameters/endpoints: Change in negative symptoms, Social functioning, and quality of life, Productivity losses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 6, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2017
CompletedJuly 14, 2017
July 1, 2017
2.8 years
July 6, 2017
July 12, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Level of social engagement
Level of social engagement as measured by experiences sampling method
3 months (at study completion)
Negative symptoms
Negative symptoms as measured with PANSS
3 months (at study completion)
Negative symptoms
Negative symptoms as measured with BNSS
3 months (at study completion)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Quality of Life
3 months (at study completion)
Global functioning
3 months (at study completion)
Productivity losses
3 months (at study completion)
Positive and General Symptomatology
3 months (at study completion)
Depression
3 months (at study completion)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CBT-SA
EXPERIMENTAL1. Group sessions for 4 weeks, two sessions per week, 60 minutes per session, two trainers (a CBT therapist and a CBT assistant); eight participants, and; 2. Individual sessions (crystallizing learned skills, focus on individual needs) during 6-8 weeks, one session per week, 45 minutes per session
Standard Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in both study conditions will receive ST. Participants are hospitalized or attending day-treatment at the Department of Early Psychosis, Amsterdam, the psychosis department of the ABC team, Utrecht, Parnassia Den Haag and collaborating (local community) mental health centers.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- recent onset schizophrenia or related disorder (start antipsychotic medication \<2 yr);
- Social withdrawal (\> 3 moderate severity on the PANSS N4; Passive/apathic social withdrawal; range 0-7);
- Aged 18-35 years;
- Fluent in Dutch
- IQ\>70;
- Able and willing to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than eighteen years of age;
- No mastery of the Dutch language;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)lead
- Arkincollaborator
- Vroege Psychose ABC - Utrechtcollaborator
- Centrum Eerste Psychose, Utrecht, Netherlandscollaborator
- GGZ inGeestcollaborator
Related Publications (4)
Staring AB, Ter Huurne MA, van der Gaag M. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for negative symptoms (CBT-n) in psychotic disorders: a pilot study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;44(3):300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
PMID: 23454550BACKGROUNDGrant PM, Huh GA, Perivoliotis D, Stolar NM, Beck AT. Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive therapy for low-functioning patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;69(2):121-7. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.129. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
PMID: 21969420BACKGROUNDVerma S, Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Poon LY, Chong SA. Symptomatic and functional remission in patients with first-episode psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012 Oct;126(4):282-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01883.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
PMID: 22616617BACKGROUNDWijnen BFM, Pos K, Velthorst E, Schirmbeck F, Chan HY, de Haan L, van der Gaag M, Evers SMAA, Smit F. Economic evaluation of brief cognitive behavioural therapy for social activation in recent-onset psychosis. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206236. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30419038DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lieuwe de Haan, Ph.D.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Randomisation is coordinated a staff member of the psychosis department who is not involved in the research team and not familiar with both the assessments or intervention procedure. The results of the randomization is concealed from the assessors. Every effort has been made to keep assessors blind to treatment condition, using the following strategies: research workers were not involved in the randomization process, therapists and research workers made use of different (secured) agendas, and work locations / rooms in order tot minimize the chance of potential blind breaks; patients will be frequently reminded by assessors not to talk about treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Psychotic Disorders
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2017
First Posted
July 14, 2017
Study Start
May 6, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07