Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
RAR
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective randomized trial comparing robotic versus laparoscopic Low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Primary endpoint: Compare urinary dysfunction between robotic and laparoscopic approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 16, 2019
October 1, 2019
2.3 years
April 10, 2017
October 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Urinary dysfunction
Urodynamic test
Change from Before surgery to 3 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sexual dysfunction
Change from Before surgery to 3 months after surgery
Post operative outcomes
Within the first 30 days after the surgical procedure
Costs
From the surgical procedure until the last follow up, which will be 24 months or the day of death.
Study Arms (2)
Robotic
EXPERIMENTALRobotic low anterior resection
Laparoscopic
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic low anterior resection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mid or low Rectal Adenocarcinoma
- Performance Status (ECOG) 0 - 2
You may not qualify if:
- Metastatic disease
- Congestive heart failure
- Renal failure
- Diabetes
- Pregnancy
- Neurologic disorders
- Alfa blockers user
- Patients who are candidates to APR ( Abdomino-perineal resection)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Instituto Nacional de Câncer- INCA
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
de Jesus JP, Valadao M, de Castro Araujo RO, Cesar D, Linhares E, Iglesias AC. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;42(6):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
PMID: 27038996BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcus Valadão, Dr
Instituto Nacional de Câncer-INCA
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2017
First Posted
July 6, 2017
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share