Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
Cooladvrsigcr
An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Da Vinci Robotic Approach for Gastric Cancer Resection.
1 other identifier
interventional
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gastric cancer is a common gastrointestinal tumor, and surgical operation is still the main method of gastric cancer treatment. Reported for the first time since 1994, the laparoscopic gastric cancer radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic technique is widely applied in the field of gastrointestinal surgery, has gradually replaced the traditional open operation as the main mode of surgical treatment for gastric cancer. Although laparoscopy has many advantages, there are still disadvantages, such as the discomfort of the physician, the reverse operation, and the ease of shaking, which hinder the application of laparoscopy. In recent years, the Da Vinci robot assisted gastric resection has become a new way to treat gastric cancer. Compared with the traditional laparoscopy and laparotomy, the operation of the robot is more precise and flexible, with obvious advantages of minimally invasive and good application value and prospect. The aim of the study is to compare value (outcomes/costs) of surgery in patients with Gastric Cancer by 3 approaches: open, laparoscopic, and robotic.First of all, the investigators will collect 500 cases of Gastric Cancer patients, randomly assigned for the open, laparoscopic, and robotic group. Secondly, to analyzing the demographic data,basic treatment and follow-up data, including the operation time, blood loss, the number of cut edge positive, the distances of cut edge away from the tumor edge, the cases of anastomotic fistula bleeding, stenosis, average such confinement, the meal time, cost of treatment, tumor recurrence rate, the presence of residual stomach, upset stomach and frequency, reflux esophagitis, bile reflux gastritis and other indicators.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedMarch 2, 2018
February 1, 2018
2 years
February 21, 2018
February 28, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Tumor recurrence rate
2 years
cost of treatment
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the operation time
one hour-six hours
Other Outcomes (1)
the all number of postoperative complications( frequency,reflux esophagitis and bile reflux gastritis)
2 years
Study Arms (3)
Open
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic
EXPERIMENTALRobotic
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients without contraindications gastroscope,surgery and anesthesia;
- There is no history of abdominal surgery, no severe abdominal cavity adhesion
- Patients signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with preoperative assessment of distant metastasis;
- Patients with preoperative radiation and chemotherapy or hormone therapy;
- Patients with acute obstruction, bleeding or perforation of the emergency surgery
- Patients with a history of abdominal trauma or abdominal surgery.
- Patients with contraindications gastroscope,surgery and anesthesia;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jun Jun She, M.D; PhD
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2018
First Posted
February 27, 2018
Study Start
February 28, 2018
Primary Completion
February 28, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
March 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02