Study Stopped
Funding
ACDF Comparison Trial
Comparison of Outcomes After ACDF Using Allograft Fusion Versus PEEK Fusion: a Prospective Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This research protocol seeks to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical spine disease patients following standard-of-care anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using allograft fusion versus Cohere porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion device. This clinical study presents little to no additional risk to study subjects beyond those associated with standard-of-care ACDF surgery. Adults age 18 and over who are undergoing an ACDF procedure will be enrolled in the study. The study consists of a completing a series of questionnaires and obtaining radiographs. The primary endpoint of the study will be the rate of successful spinal fusion for each group. For evaluation of the primary endpoint and additional assessments, descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, and maximum for continuous variables and frequency distribution for categorical variables will be provided, as well as tabular listings. All complications will be itemized including incidence, duration, and relationship to the device used and/or procedures performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 23, 2019
CompletedMay 13, 2019
May 1, 2019
5 months
June 12, 2017
May 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of successful fusion.
To compare post-operative bone fusion following standard-of-care ACDF using allograft fusion or Cohere porous PEEK fusion.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Overall success rate - composite score.
18 months
Study Arms (2)
Allograft Fusion Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft.
Cohere PEEK Fusion Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of a Cohere porous PEEK fusion device.
Interventions
ACDF is a surgical technique used to treat a variety of cervical spine disorders, such as nerve root or spinal cord compression, cervical spondylosis, and cervical spinal stenosis. The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft was first described by Robinson and Smith in 1955. In 1958, Cloward described a wide anterior cylindrical discectomy performed with a special reamer combined with anterior fusion by the insertion of autologous iliac bone graft of the same shape. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.
Bagby et al. developed the first interbody fusion cage. Cages of different shapes and materials are used to perform ACDF which, in some cases, could be associated with plate fixation. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- or more years of age
- Able to provide informed consent
- Has documented diagnosis of cervical spine radiculopathy and/or myelopathy
- Is undergoing standard-of-care ACDF
You may not qualify if:
- Prior cervical spine surgery
- Single-level ACDF
- Has a systemic infection or cervical spine infection
- Has a medical condition that may interfere with bone and soft tissue healing
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may preclude accurate data collection or evaluation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Haglund, MD
Duke University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2017
First Posted
June 14, 2017
Study Start
December 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 23, 2019
Study Completion
April 23, 2019
Last Updated
May 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share