Study Stopped
poor recruitment
Stand-Alone Cage Verus Anterior Plating for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results between two different techniques for ACDF: 1. Stand-alone ACDF, which means the placement of an interbody device (cage) without anterior fixation or plating; 2. ACDF with and interbody cage and anterior plating for fixation. Both of these procedures are commonly performed at Rush with unclear advantage of one procedure over the other. Both have been associated with good to excellent clinical outcomes. The devices used in this study are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedSeptember 16, 2021
September 1, 2021
3.5 years
August 8, 2017
September 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Improvement - Change in Baseline Visual analogue Score (VAS) for Pain
Patients will be asked to complete the VAS to measure their pain prior to surgery and at their preoperative office visit(s) or just prior to surgery in the preoperative waiting area. Scores at the 6 month follow up office visit will be compared to baseline
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Dysphagia
6 months
Fusion Rates
6 months
Clinical Improvement - Change in baseline 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey at 6 months
6 months
Clinical Improvement - Change in baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 months
6 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Adverse Events
1 year
Narcotics Consumption
3 days
Study Arms (2)
Plate and Cage
ACTIVE COMPARATORACDF with interbody cage and anterior plating.
Stand Alone Cage
ACTIVE COMPARATORACDF with stand alone interbody cage without anterior plating
Interventions
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody cage placement
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody cage placement and anterior plating
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing a primary 1- to 2-level ACDF
- (a) Diagnosis: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy, stenosis, herniated nucleus pulposus, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytic complexes, and foraminal stenosis
- Patients able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical spine trauma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Related Publications (9)
Ji GY, Oh CH, Shin DA, Ha Y, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Yudoyono F. Stand-alone Cervical Cages Versus Anterior Cervical Plates in 2-Level Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion Patients: Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Aug;28(7):E433-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a355ad.
PMID: 23897053BACKGROUNDChoi KC, Ryu KS, Lee SH, Kim YH, Lee SJ, Park CK. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation -- a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jul 26;14:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-220.
PMID: 23890389BACKGROUNDOh JK, Kim TY, Lee HS, You NK, Choi GH, Yi S, Ha Y, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Shin HC. Stand-alone cervical cages versus anterior cervical plate in 2-level cervical anterior interbody fusion patients: clinical outcomes and radiologic changes. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Dec;26(8):415-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824c7d22.
PMID: 22367466BACKGROUNDLee MJ, Dettori JR, Standaert CJ, Ely CG, Chapman JR. Indication for spinal fusion and the risk of adjacent segment pathology: does reason for fusion affect risk? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S40-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826ca9b1.
PMID: 22872219BACKGROUNDHilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):190S-194S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007.
PMID: 15541666BACKGROUNDCho SK, Riew KD. Adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Jan;21(1):3-11. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-01-3.
PMID: 23281466BACKGROUNDKraemer P, Fehlings MG, Hashimoto R, Lee MJ, Anderson PA, Chapman JR, Raich A, Norvell DC. A systematic review of definitions and classification systems of adjacent segment pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S31-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d7dd6.
PMID: 22885835BACKGROUNDMobbs RJ, Rao P, Chandran NK. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating. J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Jul;14(7):639-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.04.003.
PMID: 17532499BACKGROUNDSavolainen S, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J. A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurgery. 1998 Jul;43(1):51-5. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199807000-00032.
PMID: 9657188BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kern Singh, MD
Rush University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Research Manger
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2017
First Posted
October 17, 2017
Study Start
July 17, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
September 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09