Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
91
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The pulp therapy in primary teeth is designed to eliminate the infection and keep the tooth in a functional state until its natural exfoliation. An important step for the success of endodontic therapy is the final restoration, which must seal the tooth, avoiding new contamination. Thus, this study proposes to carry out a randomized clinical trial with longitudinal follow-up of two years, in order to compare the degree of success of endodontic treatment in primary teeth restored with two different techniques: composite resin (Filtek Bulk Fill - 3M ESPE) or stainless steel crowns (3M ESPE). Success will be measured by clinical and radiographic features of primary teeth treated with the different restorations after 1, 6, 12 and 24 months. Among the secondary outcomes that will be assessed are the quality and durability of restorations and the cost benefit of treatments. Patients who seek the university clinics and require endodontic treatment will be invited to participate. The sample unit is the tooth and these will be randomized in groups through a randomization list created and distributed in sequential opaque envelopes. The envelope will be opened only after the end of endodontic treatment, to ensure allocation concealment. The data will be statistically analyzed using the Stata 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The longevity of the treatments will be evaluated by estimating survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival rates according to the type of endodontic proposed treatment will be analyzed using the log-rank test. All other clinical variables will be analized using Cox regression. The significance level for all analyzes will be 5%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2019
CompletedApril 7, 2020
April 1, 2020
1 year
July 13, 2016
April 5, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Endodontic Treatment survival
The primary outcome will be the success or failure of endodontic treatments evaluated through the tooth permanence in the arcade on clinical and radiographic conditions of normality compared between groups restorations (steel crown or composite). The clinical criteria to determine success are: absence of fistula, absence of painful symptoms, absence of pathological mobility and adequate gingival contour. Radiographically, the success criteria are: absence / reduction of rarefaction and absence / bone thinning in the furcation region later, maintenance of periradicular space, root resorption compatible with eruptive phase and absence of pathological resorption
12 months
Need for new intervention
It will be assess the need for any type of reintervention, both for the steel crown group and for the composite resin. Thus, our primary outcome will be measured in accordance with the evaluation of restorations, not only by the failure or not endodontic treatment. Clinical sucess: no fistulae or abscess Radiographic sucess: Reduction or maintenance of the interradicular lesion; No crypt breakup
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Cost-efficacy between the groups
baseline, 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
Acceptance of the treatments
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Restoration with Stainless Steel Crowns
ACTIVE COMPARATORRestoration of the tooth after endodontic treatment using stainless steel crown.
Restoration using BulkFill CR
EXPERIMENTALRestoration of the tooth after endodontic treatment using bulkfill composite resin
Interventions
After finishing the endodontic treatment with Guedes-Pinto Paste, the restoration of the teeth will be made using Stainless Steel Crowns.
After finishing the endodontic treatment with Guedes-Pinto Paste, the restoration of the teeth will be made using BulkFill composite resin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Remaining tooth structure and location of the lesion allow rehabilitation
- Do not have internal or external resorption involving more than 1/3 the length of the root
- Do not have bone loss in lateral root or crypt disruption
- With the presence of at least half of the root
You may not qualify if:
- patients whos parents did not sign the assentiment term
- patients with systemic desease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of São Paulo - School of Dentistry
São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):57-63.
PMID: 8668572BACKGROUNDGarcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 1987 Jan-Feb;54(1):30-4.
PMID: 3468139BACKGROUNDRifkin A. A simple, effective, safe technique for the root canal treatment of abscessed primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 1980 Nov-Dec;47(6):435-41. No abstract available.
PMID: 6934178BACKGROUNDRifkin A. The root canal treatment of abscessed primary teeth--a three to four year follow-up. ASDC J Dent Child. 1982 Nov-Dec;49(6):428-31. No abstract available.
PMID: 6960030BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniela P Raggio, Professor
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2016
First Posted
June 14, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 10, 2019
Last Updated
April 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share