Cost-efficacy Between ART and Composite Resin Restorations in Primary Molars
Difference of Cost-efficacy Between Atraumatic Restoration Treatment (ART) and Composite Resin Restorations in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
428
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized clinical trial study is to compare the longevity of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) using high viscosity GIC and Conventional Treatment using composite resin under rubber dam isolation and local anesthesia (CT) in primary molars. As secondary outcomes, cost-efficacy, self-reported discomfort and cooperation will also be tested. Children aging between 3 to 6 years old presenting at least one occlusal and/or occlusoproximal cavity will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the dental treatment: ART (experimental group) or CT (control group). The dental treatment will be performed at a dental care trailer located in a Public School in Barueri (São Paulo, Brazil). The unit of analysis for randomization will be the child. A number of 204 teeth presenting occlusal cavities and 240 teeth presenting occlusoproximal cavities were set after sample size calculation. The primary outcome will be the restorations' longevity, which will be assessed after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months by two evaluators through clinical examination according to Frencken et al. (1998) criteria for occlusal restorations and Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria for occlusoproximal restorations. The time spent during the dental treatment and all materials used will be considered for estimating the cost-efficacy of each treatment. The individual's discomfort will be also measured after each dental procedure using the Facial Scale of Wong-Baker. Cooperation will be assessed by the operator using a 5-point scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2019
CompletedDecember 11, 2018
December 1, 2018
2.6 years
September 21, 2015
December 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The restoration survival
The treatments will be classified as successful when they present a clinical satisfactory aspect. Otherwise, "minor failures" will be analyzed. "Minor failures" are those in which there is a defect in the restoration/crown, but it does not interfere with the tooth health.
Every 6 months up to 24 months.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cost-efficacy assessment
Through study completion, an average of 24 months
Child self-reported discomfort
Immediately after treatment
Cooperation
Immediately after treatment
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATOROcclusal and occlusoproximal composite resin restorations in primary molars (rubber dam isolation + Adhesive system + composite resin Filtek z350)
ART using Fuji IX
EXPERIMENTALOcclusal and occlusoproximal ART restorations in primary molars with GIC Fuji IX
Interventions
Occlusal and occlusoproximal ART restorations in primary molars using the high viscosity GIC Fuji IX will be performed under relative isolation. No local anesthesia will be used. Infected carious tissue will be removed with hand instruments, and the cavities restored with GIC. After the press-finger technique, the excess of material will be removed and occlusion will be checked. For occlusoproximal restoration, an adapted matrix strip with a wooden wedge will be used to assure appropriate contour.
Occlusal and occlusoproximal composite resin restorations in primary molars using the Scotchbond Multi-purpose adhesive system and the Filtek Z-350 composite resin wil be performed. Local anesthesia will be used. Absolute isolation will be performed using rubber dam and clamp. Removal of unsupported enamel will be performed using a round bur. Infected carious tissue will be removed with hand instruments. The cavity will be etched using 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds followed by rising and drying for the same amount of time. The cavity will be restored with composite resin. Occlusion will be checked. an adapted matrix strip with a wooden wedge will be used to assure appropriate contour.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aging between 3 and 6 years
- presenting good health conditions
- whose parents or legal guardians accept and sign the consent form
- with at least one occlusal or occlusal proximal caries lesion in primary molars
- only occlusal and/or occlusal-proximal surfaces with caries lesions with dentin involvement
You may not qualify if:
- severe behavioral issues
- presence of fistula or abscess near the selected tooth
- presence of pulp exposure in the selected tooth
- presence of mobility in the selected tooth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Complexo Educacional Carlos Osmarinho de Lima - Trailer USP
Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
Ladewig NM, Sahiara CS, Yoshioka L, Olegario IC, Floriano I, Tedesco TK, Mendes FM, Braga MM, Raggio DP. Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e015542. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015542.
PMID: 28698331DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Daniela P Raggio, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Pediatric Dentistry Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2015
First Posted
September 29, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 10, 2018
Study Completion
December 10, 2019
Last Updated
December 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12