Study Stopped
Failed to meet target enrollment
Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture
Ultrasound-localized Landmark Identification in Hospitalized Patients Requiring Lumbar Puncture: Implications for Safety, Quality, and Procedural Success
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although the lumbar puncture is a common procedure and has been performed without ultrasound for decades, other research studies suggest that there may be some benefits to using ultrasound. This study intends to see whether by using ultrasound there is increased success rate, decreased need for additional procedures, and less discomfort during the procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2018
CompletedJanuary 9, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.1 years
May 24, 2017
January 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Procedural Duration
This is defined by number of minutes from initiating of patient positioning (prior to evaluation of the anatomical landmarks) to first flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Approximately 1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Procedures Considered to be Failures
Approximately 1 hour
Number of Fluoroscopically Guided or CT Guided Lumbar Punctures
Approximately 7 days
Total number of unique skin punctures
Approximately 1 day
Procedurist reported ease of the procedure
Approximately 1 day
Patient reported discomfort
Approximately 1 day
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
OTHERTraditional landmark-based lumbar puncture technique by palpation
Experimental (ultrasound)
EXPERIMENTALUse of point-of-care ultrasound to identify bony landmarks.
Interventions
A point-of-care ultrasound machine will be utilized to identify and mark midline and the interspinous space based on visualization of spinous processes.
Palpation of anatomical landmarks to identify midline and interspinous space
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who registered for an emergency or inpatient encounter between 5/22/2017 and 5/08/2018
- Males or females 18 years of age or older
- Patients who have been identified as requiring a lumbar puncture for any therapeutic or diagnostic or therapeutic indication, as decided by the neurology staff physicians, residents, or advanced practice providers.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are not capable of providing consent for participation in research and do not have an authorized relative or power of attorney to consent in their stead.
- Patients who require lumbar puncture in an emergency, time dependent fashion and in whom a possible delay could conceivable have a negative clinical impact.
- Patients with known abnormal lumbar spinal anatomy or prior extensive surgical fusion such that fluoroscopic or CT guidance is determined to be more clinically appropriate by the treating physicians.
- BMI greater than 60
- Absolute contraindication to lumbar puncture such as uncorrected coagulopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Related Publications (9)
Edwards C, Leira EC, Gonzalez-Alegre P. Residency training: a failed lumbar puncture is more about obesity than lack of ability. Neurology. 2015 Mar 10;84(10):e69-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001335.
PMID: 25754807BACKGROUNDEngedal TS, Ording H, Vilholm OJ. Changing the needle for lumbar punctures: results from a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;130:74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
PMID: 25590665BACKGROUNDFerre RM, Sweeney TW. Emergency physicians can easily obtain ultrasound images of anatomical landmarks relevant to lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;25(3):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.013.
PMID: 17349903BACKGROUNDGrau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):64-7. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.19633. No abstract available.
PMID: 11172514BACKGROUNDHuang MY, Lin AP, Chang WH. Ultrasound-assisted localization for lumbar puncture in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):955-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.03.007. No abstract available.
PMID: 18926360BACKGROUNDLahham S, Schmalbach P, Wilson SP, Ludeman L, Subeh M, Chao J, Albadawi N, Mohammadi N, Fox JC. Prospective evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound for pre-procedure identification of landmarks versus traditional palpation for lumbar puncture. World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(3):173-7. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.03.002.
PMID: 27547275BACKGROUNDNomura JT, Leech SJ, Shenbagamurthi S, Sierzenski PR, O'Connor RE, Bollinger M, Humphrey M, Gukhool JA. A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture. J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Oct;26(10):1341-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.1341.
PMID: 17901137BACKGROUNDPeterson MA, Pisupati D, Heyming TW, Abele JA, Lewis RJ. Ultrasound for routine lumbar puncture. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):130-6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12305.
PMID: 24673668BACKGROUNDWilliams S, Khalil M, Weerasinghe A, Sharma A, Davey R. How to do it: bedside ultrasound to assist lumbar puncture. Pract Neurol. 2017 Jan;17(1):47-50. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2016-001463. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
PMID: 27895189BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael P Boniface, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2017
First Posted
May 25, 2017
Study Start
May 25, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01