NCT01671371

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether point-of-care (bedside) ultrasound assists physicians in the evaluation and management of patients with syncope.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2012

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 17, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 23, 2012

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 30, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 17, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 29, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

syncopepoint of careultrasoundechocardiography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Final Emergency Department Disposition

    Time at which an admit or discharge order is placed within the electronic medical record (estimated 2-3 hours)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Time to therapeutic intervention

    At onset of therapeutic interventions including but not limited to intravenous fluids and medications (estimated time frame 0 - 6 hours)

  • Time to clinical procedure

    At onset of clinical procedures including but not limited to central line placement, pericardiocentesis, thoracentesis, etc. (estimated time frame 0-6 hours)

  • Number and Type of other imaging studies

    End of Emergency Department Encounter (estimated time frame 1- 6 hours)

  • Information Content provided by Point-of-Care Ultrasound

    After performance of point-of-care ultrasound (estimated time frame 1- 6 hours)

  • Number and type of laboratory studies

    estimated time frame 0-6 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Short Term Adverse Outcome

    7 days from Emergency Department Visit

Study Arms (2)

Immediate Ultrasound

OTHER

A point-of-care ultrasound will be performed during the initial evaluation of the patient after randomization (Defined as Time 0)

Other: Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Delayed Ultrasound

OTHER

A point-of-care ultrasound will be performed by the provider at 60 min after initial randomization

Other: Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Interventions

Performance of a focused cardiac ultrasound including a qualitative assessment of left ventricular function, pericardial effusion, right ventricular strain, proximal ascending aortic diameter, and inferior vena cava size and collapsibility

Delayed UltrasoundImmediate Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years and older presenting to the ED with acute syncope (defined as transient loss of consciousness) or near syncope (sensation of impending but not actual loss of consciousness) as a reason for ED visit.

You may not qualify if:

  • persistent altered mental status
  • alcohol or illicit drug-related loss of consciousness
  • definite seizure, and transient loss of consciousness caused by head trauma.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Keller C, Tristano JM, De Lorenzo R, et al.

    BACKGROUND
  • Grossman SA, Fischer C, Lipsitz LA, Mottley L, Sands K, Thompson S, Zimetbaum P, Shapiro NI. Predicting adverse outcomes in syncope. J Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;33(3):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

    PMID: 17976548BACKGROUND
  • Dhatreecharan S, Azar P, Werner MS, et al.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gabayan GZ, Derose SF, Asch SM, Chiu VY, Glenn SC, Mangione CM, Sun BC. Predictors of short-term (seven-day) cardiac outcomes after emergency department visit for syncope. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jan 1;105(1):82-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.654.

    PMID: 20102895BACKGROUND
  • Martin NM, Picard MH. Use and appropriateness of transthoracic echocardiography in an academic medical center: a pilot observational study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Jan;22(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

    PMID: 19022620BACKGROUND
  • Christopher L Moore and Joshua A Copel.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Syncope

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

UnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Richard A Taylor, M.D.

    Yale University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2012

First Posted

August 23, 2012

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion

July 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 30, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Locations