NCT03164252

Brief Summary

The low-power laser provides the body with an improvement in the inflammatory response. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate two laser application protocols in 60 patients requiring surgical treatment for extraction of third molars included, without distinction of race or gender, aged between 16 and 40 years, coming from the Faculty of Dentistry Of São José dos Campos (UNESP). These patients will be divided randomly into 3 groups: group 1 - intraoral irradiation with 660 nm laser at a dose of 10 J (30 mW, 10 J / cm 2) , group 2 - intraoral irradiation with 660 nm laser at a dose of 30 J (30 mW, 30 J / cm 2) and group 3- control group, with application of placebo laser. At 3 and 7 days after surgery, the patients will be evaluated by two evaluators who will measure edema, trismus and pain. The tissue repair will also be evaluated after 1, 3 and 6 months of surgery, through radiographic analysis and periodontal conditions in the distal of the lower second molar. The results will be submitted to descriptive statistics and compared using the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with significance level of 5%.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 23, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 7, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 6, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 18, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2018

Status Verified

June 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 18, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Third molar;Third molar surgery;Laser;Tissue Repair.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Periodontal probing

    Evaluated in patients in groups I (Lower laser fluency), II (Greater laser fluency) and III (Laser sham). For the investigator periodontal evaluation was performed based on the modified Montero \& Mazzaglia (2011) methodology, where the length of the clinical crown in the second distal molar region will be measured with a North Carolina-type probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, USA). According to this methodology, we will previously mold the occlusal of the second molar with a condensation silicone (Optosil Xantopren, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), which was used as a guide to standardize the location and height of the measurement. We will then measure at three points in the distal of the second molar: disto-lingual, mesio-distal and vestibular-distal.

    Initially carried out in one, three and six months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain assessment

    Evaluated immediately, two, four, six and eight hours after surgery. And with continuity for one, two, three and four days

  • Edema assessment

    Initially carried out in three and seven days.

  • Trismus assessment

    Initially carried out in three and seven days

  • Radiographic assessment

    Assessment in one, three and six months

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Tissue repair

    Assessment in three days

  • Problems encountered after surgery

    Assessment in four days

Study Arms (3)

Grupo I- Lower laser fluency

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

20 patients received 660 nm red laser diode laser therapy, 30 mW power and 10 J / cm2 fluency, in the immediate period after surgical period of the third molar third molar extraction / impacted by the intraoral region

Radiation: Grupo II- Greater laser fluencyRadiation: Grupo III- Laser sham

Grupo II- Greater laser fluency

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

20 patients received 660 nm red laser diode laser therapy, 30 mW power and 30J / cm2 fluency, in the immediate period after surgical of the third molar third molar extraction / impacted by the intraoral region

Radiation: Grupo I- Lower laser fluencyRadiation: Grupo III- Laser sham

Grupo III- Laser sham

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Application of laser sham, the handpiece of the device will be positioned intraorally and activated. However, the tip of the applicator will be covered by an opaque material that prevents radiation from passing through.

Radiation: Grupo I- Lower laser fluencyRadiation: Grupo II- Greater laser fluency

Interventions

The region determined for the application of the laser will be 4 points of the gingival mucosa: 1 - center of the alveolus; 2- center of the cervical third of the lingual face; 3 - lingual face; And 4 - apical third of the lingual face. The application time of the laser will be divided equally between the four points of application.

Also known as: Red laser diode of 660 nm/ power 30 mW/ creep of 10 J / cm2
Grupo II- Greater laser fluencyGrupo III- Laser sham

The region determined for the application of the laser will be 4 points of the gingival mucosa: 1 - center of the alveolus; 2- center of the cervical third of the lingual face; 3 - lingual face; And 4 - apical third of the lingual face. The application time of the laser will be divided equally between the four points of application.

Also known as: Red laser diode of 660 nm/ power 30 mW/ creep of 30 J / cm2.
Grupo I- Lower laser fluencyGrupo III- Laser sham

The region determined for the application of the laser will be 4 points of the gingival mucosa: 1 - center of the alveolus; 2- center of the cervical third of the lingual face; 3 - lingual face; And 4 - apical third of the lingual face. The application time of the laser will be divided equally between the four points of application.

Also known as: Control group, application of laser sham
Grupo I- Lower laser fluencyGrupo II- Greater laser fluency

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy patients, without surgical contraindications, requiring avulsion of the included third molars and / or impacted lower molars,
  • Teeth classified according to Winter (1926) as mesioangulated and according to Pell \& Gregory (1933) as 1A to 2B.
  • Between the ages of 16 and 40
  • Who have agreed to participate in the research voluntarily, after knowing the risks and benefits, and signed the Informed Consent Term (TCLE)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with any systemic or local change that contraindicate the procedure,
  • Use of anti-inflammatories in the last 15 days,
  • Patients smokers or diabetics.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Lago-Mendez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gandara Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):979-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.281.

  • Lopez-Ramirez M, Vilchez-Perez MA, Gargallo-Albiol J, Arnabat-Dominguez J, Gay-Escoda C. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of pain, facial swelling, and postoperative trismus after a lower third molar extraction. A preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 May;27(3):559-66. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0936-8. Epub 2011 May 27.

  • Montero J, Mazzaglia G. Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):2691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.06.205. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Control Groups

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Michelle B Moraes, PHD

    ICT-Unesp

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Surgical procedures were always performed by the same surgeon and assistant, who were unaware of the surrogate group that belonged to the patient, as well as the patient himself. This randomization was performed involving numbers and envelopes, being only the investigator's knowledge.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The sample of this study will be composed of 60 patients between 16 and 40 years old, who need to undergo the extraction of third molars included and / or impacted. The patients will be those who voluntarily seek the Discipline of Buccomaxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology, at the State University of São Paulo "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - Unesp, to perform the procedure. This study will be a randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial with the following groups: Group I (with 20 patients) - laser therapy used in the immediate postoperative period will be intraoral irradiation with 660 nm red diode laser, 30 mW power and 10 J / cm2 fluency. Group II (with 20 patients) - laser therapy used in the immediate postoperative period will be intraoral irradiation with 660 nm red diode laser, 30 mW power and 30 J / cm2 fluency. Group III (with 20 patients) - Control Group - Application of laser sham.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor Assistente Doutor - Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brasil.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2017

First Posted

May 23, 2017

Study Start

February 23, 2016

Primary Completion

June 7, 2016

Study Completion

December 6, 2016

Last Updated

June 18, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share