Low Power Laser in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
Low Power Laser in the Second Molar Tissue Repair and in the Postoperative of Mandibular Third Molar Surgery - Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
7
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The low-power laser provides the body with an improvement in the inflammatory response. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate two laser application protocols in 60 patients requiring surgical treatment for extraction of third molars included, without distinction of race or gender, aged between 16 and 40 years, coming from the Faculty of Dentistry Of São José dos Campos (UNESP). These patients will be divided randomly into 3 groups: group 1 - intraoral irradiation with 660 nm laser at a dose of 10 J (30 mW, 10 J / cm 2) , group 2 - intraoral irradiation with 660 nm laser at a dose of 30 J (30 mW, 30 J / cm 2) and group 3- control group, with application of placebo laser. At 3 and 7 days after surgery, the patients will be evaluated by two evaluators who will measure edema, trismus and pain. The tissue repair will also be evaluated after 1, 3 and 6 months of surgery, through radiographic analysis and periodontal conditions in the distal of the lower second molar. The results will be submitted to descriptive statistics and compared using the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with significance level of 5%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 23, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 7, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2017
CompletedJune 18, 2018
June 1, 2018
4 months
May 18, 2017
June 14, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Periodontal probing
Evaluated in patients in groups I (Lower laser fluency), II (Greater laser fluency) and III (Laser sham). For the investigator periodontal evaluation was performed based on the modified Montero \& Mazzaglia (2011) methodology, where the length of the clinical crown in the second distal molar region will be measured with a North Carolina-type probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, USA). According to this methodology, we will previously mold the occlusal of the second molar with a condensation silicone (Optosil Xantopren, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), which was used as a guide to standardize the location and height of the measurement. We will then measure at three points in the distal of the second molar: disto-lingual, mesio-distal and vestibular-distal.
Initially carried out in one, three and six months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain assessment
Evaluated immediately, two, four, six and eight hours after surgery. And with continuity for one, two, three and four days
Edema assessment
Initially carried out in three and seven days.
Trismus assessment
Initially carried out in three and seven days
Radiographic assessment
Assessment in one, three and six months
Other Outcomes (2)
Tissue repair
Assessment in three days
Problems encountered after surgery
Assessment in four days
Study Arms (3)
Grupo I- Lower laser fluency
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 patients received 660 nm red laser diode laser therapy, 30 mW power and 10 J / cm2 fluency, in the immediate period after surgical period of the third molar third molar extraction / impacted by the intraoral region
Grupo II- Greater laser fluency
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 patients received 660 nm red laser diode laser therapy, 30 mW power and 30J / cm2 fluency, in the immediate period after surgical of the third molar third molar extraction / impacted by the intraoral region
Grupo III- Laser sham
PLACEBO COMPARATORApplication of laser sham, the handpiece of the device will be positioned intraorally and activated. However, the tip of the applicator will be covered by an opaque material that prevents radiation from passing through.
Interventions
The region determined for the application of the laser will be 4 points of the gingival mucosa: 1 - center of the alveolus; 2- center of the cervical third of the lingual face; 3 - lingual face; And 4 - apical third of the lingual face. The application time of the laser will be divided equally between the four points of application.
The region determined for the application of the laser will be 4 points of the gingival mucosa: 1 - center of the alveolus; 2- center of the cervical third of the lingual face; 3 - lingual face; And 4 - apical third of the lingual face. The application time of the laser will be divided equally between the four points of application.
The region determined for the application of the laser will be 4 points of the gingival mucosa: 1 - center of the alveolus; 2- center of the cervical third of the lingual face; 3 - lingual face; And 4 - apical third of the lingual face. The application time of the laser will be divided equally between the four points of application.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy patients, without surgical contraindications, requiring avulsion of the included third molars and / or impacted lower molars,
- Teeth classified according to Winter (1926) as mesioangulated and according to Pell \& Gregory (1933) as 1A to 2B.
- Between the ages of 16 and 40
- Who have agreed to participate in the research voluntarily, after knowing the risks and benefits, and signed the Informed Consent Term (TCLE)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any systemic or local change that contraindicate the procedure,
- Use of anti-inflammatories in the last 15 days,
- Patients smokers or diabetics.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Lago-Mendez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gandara Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):979-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.281.
PMID: 17448851RESULTLopez-Ramirez M, Vilchez-Perez MA, Gargallo-Albiol J, Arnabat-Dominguez J, Gay-Escoda C. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of pain, facial swelling, and postoperative trismus after a lower third molar extraction. A preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 May;27(3):559-66. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0936-8. Epub 2011 May 27.
PMID: 21617973RESULTMontero J, Mazzaglia G. Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):2691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.06.205. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
PMID: 21864969RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle B Moraes, PHD
ICT-Unesp
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Surgical procedures were always performed by the same surgeon and assistant, who were unaware of the surrogate group that belonged to the patient, as well as the patient himself. This randomization was performed involving numbers and envelopes, being only the investigator's knowledge.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Assistente Doutor - Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia - São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brasil.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2017
First Posted
May 23, 2017
Study Start
February 23, 2016
Primary Completion
June 7, 2016
Study Completion
December 6, 2016
Last Updated
June 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share