Clinical Study of Biostimulation With Low-Power Diode Laser After Dental Extractions
CSBE
CLINICAL STUDY OF BIOSTIMULATION WITH LOW-POWER DIODE LASER AFTER DENTAL EXTRACTIONS
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
the objective of the present work is to assess the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) with respect to pain, inflammation, and healing after tooth extractions as compared with a sham treatment
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2025
CompletedApril 24, 2025
April 1, 2025
4 years
April 16, 2025
April 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Intensity (Self-Reported Visual Analog Scale - VAS, 0-10)
hange in self-reported pain scores from Day 0 to Day 7 using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.
Self-reported Pain Scores Using 0m Visual Analog Scale 10 Pain Score.Total pain improvement over day 0 to day 7
Study Arms (2)
Group I (Experimental):
EXPERIMENTALpatients subjected to a tooth extraction and immediately given an intraoral PBM session with an EPIC X Biolase diode laser (BIOLASE, Inc. USA), . It was applied at three points in the area: buccal, pala-tal/lingual, and occlusal to stimulate the tissue
Group Sham
SHAM COMPARATORpatients undergoing tooth extraction and the application of inactive/simulated PBM im-mediately after using the same procedure
Interventions
patients subjected to a tooth extraction and immediately given an intraoral PBM session with an EPIC X Biolase diode laser (BIOLASE, Inc. USA), with a voltage of 100-240 V, 1.5 A, a power of 0.5 W, and an application of an energy of 15J per cm², for 10-30 seconds at 1 mm of the tissue with an sterile surgical tip. It was applied at three points in the area: buccal, pala-tal/lingual, and occlusal to stimulate the tissue.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lopez-Jornet Pia
Mur, Spain, 30008, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Ahrari F, Eshghpour M, Zare R, Ebrahimi S, Fallahrastegar A, Khaki H. Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Irradiation in Reducing Pain and Accelerating Socket Healing After Undisturbed Tooth Extraction. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Summer;11(3):274-279. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.46. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
PMID: 32802287BACKGROUNDCamolesi GCV, Silva FFVE, Aulestia-Viera PV, Marichalar-Mendia X, Gandara-Vila P, Perez-Sayans M. IS THE PHOTOBIOMODULATION THERAPY EFFECTIVE IN CONTROLLING POST-SURGICAL SIDE EFFECTS AFTER THE EXTRACTION OF MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024 Jun;24(2):101983. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101983. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
PMID: 38821660BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2025
First Posted
April 24, 2025
Study Start
June 20, 2020
Primary Completion
June 20, 2024
Study Completion
June 20, 2024
Last Updated
April 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04