NCT03164239

Brief Summary

The purpose of this regional parallel-group RCT was to assess the effect of a six-month tailored telephone and email based physical activity intervention on various measures of physical fitness and body composition in a sample of physically inactive adults. A total of 111 physically inactive adults (40-55yr) from Agder, Norway were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (IG;n=56) or a no-intervention control group (CG;n=55). The IG received tailored exercise recommendations, every two months by email or mail (print) in addition to motivational follow-ups every second week, alternatively by email and telephone. Primary outcome measures were various objective measures of musculoskeletal and cardiorespiratory fitness in addition to various measures of body composition, including waist circumference, body mass index and fat percentage, which were assessed pre- and post-intervention.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2011

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2011

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2012

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 25, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

March 9, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Change from Baseline Cardiorespiratory fitness at 6 months

    Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured by a modified Balke protocol on a treadmill and registered in ml/kg/min

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Muscular endurance of the back extensors at 6 months

    The static back extension test recorded muscular endurance of the back extensors as number of seconds the subject managed to endure a static horizontal position, with their lower body supported by a bench (max 240 sec).

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Hand grip strength at 6 months

    Hand grip strength was registered to the nearest 1 kilogram (kg) using a hydraulic dynamometer

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Neuromotor fitness at 6 months

    Neuromotor fitness was registered using the one leg standing test where the duration each subject managed to hold a balancing position was recorded in seconds (max 60 seconds).

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Muscular dynamic endurance of and the ability to stabilize the upper body at 6 months

    Muscular dynamic endurance of and the ability to stabilize the upper body was registered using a modified push-ups test. The amount of correctly performed repetitions completed in 40 seconds, was recorded in number.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Flexibility of the hamstring musculature at 6 months

    Flexibility of the hamstring musculature was recorded using the sit-and-reach test to the nearest half centimeter, using a specially designed box.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Flexibility in the shoulder joint at 6 months

    Flexibility of the shoulder joint was registered to the nearest centimeter, using the back-scratch test. The mean registered flexibility score of both shoulders was recorded.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Explosive power in the lower extremities at 6 months

    Explosive power in the lower extremities was recorded to the nearest centimeter, using the vertical jump test.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Body mass index at 6 months

    Body mass index was calculated using the formula weight/height\^2. Height and weight were measured using a measuring band (meters) and a weight scale (kilograms) respectively.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Waist circumference at 6 months

    Waist circumference was registered using a measuring band and the mean of two measures was recorded to the nearest half-centimeter.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Fat percentage at 6 months

    Fat percentage was measured using the bioimpedance machine InBody 720 and using skinfolds. Both registered body fat percentage.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

  • Change from Baseline Cardiorespiratory fitness at 6 months

    Cardiorespiratory fitness was measure by a modified Balke protocol on a treadmill and registered in l/min.

    Data collected prior to (pre) and after (post) a 6 month intervention period. Pretest was conducted in March-April, 2011 and post test was conducted in October-November, 2011.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Age

    This is one of the descriptive statistics which was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011.

  • Gender

    This is one of the descriptive statistics which was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011

  • Educational level

    This is one of the descriptive statistics which was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Physical activity level

    This is one of the variables determining inclusion to the study and was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011

  • Stage of change

    This is one of the variables determining inclusion to the study and was collected at one time point only. Data were collected on day one, in april 2011

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group - telephone and print exercise intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group (IG) received a total of three intervention packages, one every second month, during the intervention period. The first intervention package was distributed at intervention start. The intervention package consisted of a tailored exercise program, national recommendations for physical activity, prompts and reminders. Additionally the IG received fortnightly supportive motivational contact every two weeks, alternately by telephone og email

Behavioral: Intervention group - telephone and print exercise intervention

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

The control group (CG) were encouraged to continue previous lifestyle.

Interventions

Intervention has previously been described.

Intervention group - telephone and print exercise intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants were included in the study if they were
  • healthy
  • between the ages of 40-55
  • residents of the Agder counties in Norway
  • classified as physically inactive (not fulfill the recommendations for physical activity given by the Norwegian Directorate of Health
  • within stage one to three of the five stages of change in the transtheoretical model stages of change

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants were excluded if they were
  • Unhealthy/ill
  • younger than 40 years or older than 55 years
  • living outside the Agder counties in Norway
  • allready fulfilling the national recommendations given by the Norwegian Directorate of Health
  • within stage four or five of the five stages of change in the transtheoretical model stages of change

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Kjaer IGH, Anderssen SA, Torstveit MK. A tailored telephone and email based exercise intervention induced reductions in various measures of body composition in physically inactive adults: A randomized controlled trial. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jun 27;11:160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.06.011. eCollection 2018 Sep.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Monica K Torstveit, PhD

    University of Agder

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2017

First Posted

May 23, 2017

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

February 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 25, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The IPD of the present study will be shared through publications (articles).