NCT02507869

Brief Summary

Despite awareness of the benefits of engaging in regular physical activity, at least 50% of adults in the US do not meet recommended guidelines for physical activity. One potential explanation for this lack of regular physical activity is that people often experience exercise as affectively unpleasant. Evidence suggests that the more positively people experience exercise (i.e., the better they feel while exercising), the more likely they are to engage in regular physical activity. This may be especially true for people in poor cardiorespiratory condition. In this randomized trial, investigators compared the effects of an affect-guided exercise prescription (intervention) to a heart rate-guided exercise prescription (control) on change in physical activity minutes among previously underactive adults. Investigators also tested whether the effect of the intervention was moderated by differences in cardiorespiratory fitness.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
67

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2013

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2014

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2015

Status Verified

July 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 23, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in physical activity minutes measured by the 7-day PAR

    One week

  • Change in physical activity minutes measured by the 7-day PAR

    One month

Study Arms (2)

Affect-Guided Prescription

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention: Participants in the affect-guided condition are instructed to exercise while monitoring how they feel, and to adjust the intensity of their exercise to maintain a pleasant affective response.

Behavioral: Positive affective response

Heart Rate-Guided Prescription

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention: Participants in the heart rate-guided condition are instructed to exercise while monitoring their heart rate, and to adjust the intensity of the exercise to maintain a heart rate in the moderate range (64-76% of their HRmax).

Behavioral: Moderate-intensity heart rate

Interventions

Participants adjust the intensity of their exercise to maintain a pleasant affective response.

Affect-Guided Prescription

Participants adjust the intensity of the exercise to maintain a heart rate in the moderate range (64-76% of their HRmax).

Heart Rate-Guided Prescription

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physically underactive individuals (\< 60 minutes of physical activity/week).

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, or hypertension.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • Ekkekakis P, Lind E. Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Apr;30(4):652-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803052.

    PMID: 16130028BACKGROUND
  • Ekkekakis P, Parfitt G, Petruzzello SJ. The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med. 2011 Aug 1;41(8):641-71. doi: 10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000.

    PMID: 21780850BACKGROUND
  • Ekkekakis P, Lind E, Vazou S. Affective responses to increasing levels of exercise intensity in normal-weight, overweight, and obese middle-aged women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Jan;18(1):79-85. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.204. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

    PMID: 19556979BACKGROUND
  • Parfitt G, Alrumh A, Rowlands AV. Affect-regulated exercise intensity: does training at an intensity that feels 'good' improve physical health? J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Nov;15(6):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 May 31.

    PMID: 22658587BACKGROUND
  • Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Jennings EG, Marcus BH. Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10-min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity? Ann Behav Med. 2012 Aug;44(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9362-9.

    PMID: 22532005BACKGROUND
  • Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Miranda R Jr, Gwaltney CJ, Emerson JA, Monti PM, Parisi AF. Recommending self-paced exercise among overweight and obese adults: a randomized pilot study. Ann Behav Med. 2015 Apr;49(2):280-5. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9642-7.

    PMID: 25223963BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Austin Baldwin, Ph.D.

    Southern Methodist University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2015

First Posted

July 24, 2015

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 24, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-07