Development and Clinimetric Properties of the Dutch Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire in Healthy Children

NCT03162835 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Eduvalid Study (Part 1)
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 111
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The scientific objective of this research implies developing and examining the clinimetric properties of the Dutch Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ) in healthy children. A total study sample of 60 healthy children (30 from 2nd and 3rd primary school) will be included to measure test-retest reliability of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ). Children will be asked to fill in the questionnaire twice, with a time interval of 48 hours (assessment T0 and T1). In order to assess concurrent validity of the PedNPQ, 30 children (15 from 2nd and 3rd primary school) as well as their parent will receive a pediatric Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) session. It is hypothesized that if the developed PedNPQ is valid, children who received PNE will perform better than children receiving no PNE. To reduce the participant's workload, all assessments will be done immediately after the school hours or during recreation, in the primary school of the participant.

Conditions

Surveys and Questionnaires; Child; Pain; Knowledge; Validation

Keywords

Pain Neuroscience Education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Reliability of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ)

  In order to evaluate test-retest reliability of the test, the two-way mixed infraclass correlation coefficient will be calculated.

  Baseline - 48 hours after baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• Concurrent validity of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (PedNPQ)

  immediately after Pain Neuroscience education (PNE) (48 hours following baseline)

• Responsivity of the Pediatric Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire

  Baseline, immediately after Pain Neuroscience education (PNE) and 1 week following PNE

Study Arms (2)

Educated group

Children within this group will receive Pain Neuroscience Education.

Other: Pain Neuroscience Education

Non-educated group

Children within this group will not receive Pain Neuroscience Education

Interventions

Pain Neuroscience Education OTHER

Children as well as their parents will receive a +/- 1h one-on-one educational session about the neurophysiology of pain, adjusted to the child's comprehension status. Parents will be present in the PNE session too. The PNE program for children contains two sections: (1) The healthy pain system and its function, divided in subsections each consisting of a specific neurophysiological pain concept (i.e. central nervous system anatomy, nociception and nociceptive pathways, up- and down-regulation of the nervous system) and (2) adaptations of the pain system following persistent pain. To ensure interaction between therapist and child, an interactive board game was developed and used throughout the full educational session.

Educated group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 8 Years - 12 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy children will be recruited via announcements in several schools. Children will be eligible for study participation if they meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

You may qualify if:

• Healthy children
• Informed consent

You may not qualify if:

• Previous pain education
• Chronic pain
• Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
• Mental retardation
• Parent with chronic pain

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Vrije Universiteit Brussel: lead
• Universiteit Antwerpen: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Brussels, Jette, 1090, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (25)

• Perquin CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AAJM, Hunfeld JAM, Bohnen AM, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, Passchier J, van der Wouden JC. Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience. Pain. 2000 Jul;87(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00269-4.

  PMID: 10863045 BACKGROUND

• Pergolizzi J, Ahlbeck K, Aldington D, Alon E, Coluzzi F, Dahan A, Huygen F, Kocot-Kepska M, Mangas AC, Mavrocordatos P, Morlion B, Muller-Schwefe G, Nicolaou A, Perez Hernandez C, Sichere P, Schafer M, Varrassi G. The development of chronic pain: physiological CHANGE necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Sep;29(9):1127-35. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.810615. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

  PMID: 23786498 BACKGROUND

• Goodman JE, McGrath PJ. The epidemiology of pain in children and adolescents: a review. Pain. 1991 Sep;46(3):247-264. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90108-A. No abstract available.

  PMID: 1758709 BACKGROUND

• Simons LE, Basch MC. State of the art in biobehavioral approaches to the management of chronic pain in childhood. Pain Manag. 2016;6(1):49-61. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.59. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

  PMID: 26678858 BACKGROUND

• Korterink JJ, Diederen K, Benninga MA, Tabbers MM. Epidemiology of pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 May 20;10(5):e0126982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126982. eCollection 2015.

  PMID: 25992621 BACKGROUND

• Roth-Isigkeit A, Thyen U, Stoven H, Schwarzenberger J, Schmucker P. Pain among children and adolescents: restrictions in daily living and triggering factors. Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e152-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0682.

  PMID: 15687423 BACKGROUND

• Vervoort T, Logan DE, Goubert L, De Clercq B, Hublet A. Severity of pediatric pain in relation to school-related functioning and teacher support: an epidemiological study among school-aged children and adolescents. Pain. 2014 Jun;155(6):1118-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

  PMID: 24631587 BACKGROUND

• Landry BW, Fischer PR, Driscoll SW, Koch KM, Harbeck-Weber C, Mack KJ, Wilder RT, Bauer BA, Brandenburg JE. Managing Chronic Pain in Children and Adolescents: A Clinical Review. PM R. 2015 Nov;7(11 Suppl):S295-S315. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.006.

  PMID: 26568508 BACKGROUND

• Goddard JM. Chronic pain in children and young people. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011 Jun;5(2):158-63. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328345832d.

  PMID: 21415756 BACKGROUND

• Robins H, Perron V, Heathcote LC, Simons LE. Pain Neuroscience Education: State of the Art and Application in Pediatrics. Children (Basel). 2016 Dec 21;3(4):43. doi: 10.3390/children3040043.

  PMID: 28009822 BACKGROUND

• Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future. J Pain. 2015 Sep;16(9):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

  PMID: 26051220 BACKGROUND

• Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):2041-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.198.

  PMID: 22133255 BACKGROUND

• Van Oosterwijck J, Meeus M, Paul L, De Schryver M, Pascal A, Lambrecht L, Nijs J. Pain physiology education improves health status and endogenous pain inhibition in fibromyalgia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2013 Oct;29(10):873-82. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827c7a7d.

  PMID: 23370076 BACKGROUND

• Nijs J, Paul van Wilgen C, Van Oosterwijck J, van Ittersum M, Meeus M. How to explain central sensitization to patients with 'unexplained' chronic musculoskeletal pain: practice guidelines. Man Ther. 2011 Oct;16(5):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 31.

  PMID: 21632273 BACKGROUND

• Moseley L. Combined physiotherapy and education is efficacious for chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(4):297-302. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60169-0.

  PMID: 12443524 BACKGROUND

• Meeus M, Nijs J, Van Oosterwijck J, Van Alsenoy V, Truijen S. Pain physiology education improves pain beliefs in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared with pacing and self-management education: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Aug;91(8):1153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.020.

  PMID: 20684894 BACKGROUND

• Jackson T, Pope L, Nagasaka T, Fritch A, Iezzi T, Chen H. The impact of threatening information about pain on coping and pain tolerance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;10(Pt 3):441-51. doi: 10.1348/135910705X27587.

  PMID: 16238858 BACKGROUND

• Boerner KE, Noel M, Birnie KA, Caes L, Petter M, Chambers CT. Impact of Threat Level, Task Instruction, and Individual Characteristics on Cold Pressor Pain and Fear among Children and Their Parents. Pain Pract. 2016 Jul;16(6):657-68. doi: 10.1111/papr.12306. Epub 2015 May 26.

  PMID: 26011606 BACKGROUND

• Palermo TM, Chambers CT. Parent and family factors in pediatric chronic pain and disability: an integrative approach. Pain. 2005 Dec 15;119(1-3):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.027. Epub 2005 Nov 18. No abstract available.

  PMID: 16298492 BACKGROUND

• Moseley L. Unraveling the barriers to reconceptualization of the problem in chronic pain: the actual and perceived ability of patients and health professionals to understand the neurophysiology. J Pain. 2003 May;4(4):184-9. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00488-7.

  PMID: 14622702 BACKGROUND

• Catley MJ, O'Connell NE, Moseley GL. How good is the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire? A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties. J Pain. 2013 Aug;14(8):818-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 May 4.

  PMID: 23651882 BACKGROUND

• Adillon C, Lozano E, Salvat I. Comparison of pain neurophysiology knowledge among health sciences students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 22;8:592. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1585-y.

  PMID: 26493565 BACKGROUND

• Moseley GL, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):324-30. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00007.

  PMID: 15322439 BACKGROUND

• Moseley GL. Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2004 Feb;8(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(03)00063-6.

  PMID: 14690673 BACKGROUND

• Traeger AC, Moseley GL, Hubscher M, Lee H, Skinner IW, Nicholas MK, Henschke N, Refshauge KM, Blyth FM, Main CJ, Hush JM, Pearce G, McAuley JH. Pain education to prevent chronic low back pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 2;4(6):e005505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005505.

  PMID: 24889854 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

• Roselien Pas, Dra

  Vrije Universiteit Brussel

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Dra. Roselien Pas

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 17, 2017
• First Posted: May 22, 2017
• Study Start: June 12, 2017
• Primary Completion: September 22, 2018
• Study Completion: September 22, 2018
• Last Updated: October 11, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

BE (1)