NCT03151109

Brief Summary

This study will look at patient radiographic and functional outcomes who have or will undergo a reverse, extended peg, shoulder arthroplasty (replacement) that requires the use of glenoid bone grafting.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
67

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 8, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2017

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

March 8, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

reverse total shoulder arthroplastyglenoid bone loss

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Radiographic Outcome

    Evaluate Bone Graft Incorporation - review images to determine signs of humeral or glenoid radiolucency, radiographic loosening, fracture, notching, and graft incorporation versus resorption on CT and/or XRay images.

    minimum 1 year post op

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Functional outcomes at year one

    collected at 1 year post surgery

  • Functional outcomes at year two

    collected 2 years post surgery

Interventions

CT ScanDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CT scan at minimum 1 year post op

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with substantial glenoid bone loss in the context of severe glenohumeral arthrosis, advanced cuff tear arthropathy or those who have undergone prior shoulder arthroplasty and have or will undergo a reverse shoulder replacement with structural bone graft to address the problem.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients who have undergone a reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the an extended peg baseplate and structural bone graft (autograft humeral head or allograft femoral head).
  • Adult patients who are indicated for a long-pegged baseplate and glenoid bone grafting (autograft humeral head or allograft femoral head) as part of their reverse shoulder arthroplasty in our clinic,
  • bone graft is truly structural involving at least 50% of the glenoid baseplate
  • may be a primary or a revision surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with missing baseline (preop) data,
  • patients who are unwilling to participate in a final follow-up evaluation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Frankle M, Levy JC, Pupello D, Siegal S, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:178-90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00123.

    PMID: 16951091BACKGROUND
  • Naveed MA, Kitson J, Bunker TD. The Delta III reverse shoulder replacement for cuff tear arthropathy: a single-centre study of 50 consecutive procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jan;93(1):57-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24218.

    PMID: 21196544BACKGROUND
  • Nolan BM, Ankerson E, Wiater JM. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty improves function in cuff tear arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2476-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1683-z.

    PMID: 21116759BACKGROUND
  • Henninger HB, Barg A, Anderson AE, Bachus KN, Burks RT, Tashjian RZ. Effect of lateral offset center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Sep;21(9):1128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.034. Epub 2011 Oct 29.

    PMID: 22036546BACKGROUND
  • Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

    PMID: 22958838BACKGROUND
  • Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):92-6.

    PMID: 2323152BACKGROUND
  • Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Glenoid revision surgery after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):217-24. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.113961.

    PMID: 11408901BACKGROUND
  • Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):388-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024.

    PMID: 15125127BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Study Officials

  • Aaron Chamberlain, MD

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2017

First Posted

May 12, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

February 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations